|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com ctaa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos; Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
Data corrente: |
10/07/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/04/2024 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Nota Técnica/Nota Científica |
Autoria: |
GAMA, M. A. S. da; BARBOSA FILHO, H. G.; BIZZO, H. R.; ANTONIASSI, R. |
Afiliação: |
MARCO ANTONIO SUNDFELD DA GAMA, CNPGL; HERNANI GUILHERME BARBOSA FILHO, CNPGL; HUMBERTO RIBEIRO BIZZO, CTAA; ROSEMAR ANTONIASSI, CTAA. |
Título: |
Analytical shortcomings and other considerations related to the identification of biomarkers of dairy fat intake. |
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, v. 71, n. 8, p. 1022-1023, 2017. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.107 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Over the last decade, the concentrations of certain odd-chain saturated fatty acids (for example, C15:0 and C17:0) and trans-palmitoleic acid (trans-9 C16:1) in plasma and erythrocytes have been proposed as biomarkers of dairy fat intake,1, 2, 3 which is expected to overcome major issues associated with dietary assessment methods that rely on self-report, such as food frequency questionnaires. However, some overlooked analytical issues may have resulted in misidentification or even precluded other candidate biomarkers of dairy fat intake from being identified in several previous studies. The separation of fatty acids in biological and foods matrices is usually performed by gas chromatography after lipid extraction and methylation/transesterification using either acid or alkali-catalysis. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) are routinely identified by retention time comparisons with authentic commercial standards using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID). |
Palavras-Chave: |
CLA; Fat acids. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
nutrition. |
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
Marc: |
LEADER 01663naa a2200205 a 4500 001 2072438 005 2024-04-09 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2017.107$2DOI 100 1 $aGAMA, M. A. S. da 245 $aAnalytical shortcomings and other considerations related to the identification of biomarkers of dairy fat intake.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2017 520 $aOver the last decade, the concentrations of certain odd-chain saturated fatty acids (for example, C15:0 and C17:0) and trans-palmitoleic acid (trans-9 C16:1) in plasma and erythrocytes have been proposed as biomarkers of dairy fat intake,1, 2, 3 which is expected to overcome major issues associated with dietary assessment methods that rely on self-report, such as food frequency questionnaires. However, some overlooked analytical issues may have resulted in misidentification or even precluded other candidate biomarkers of dairy fat intake from being identified in several previous studies. The separation of fatty acids in biological and foods matrices is usually performed by gas chromatography after lipid extraction and methylation/transesterification using either acid or alkali-catalysis. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) are routinely identified by retention time comparisons with authentic commercial standards using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID). 650 $anutrition 653 $aCLA 653 $aFat acids 700 1 $aBARBOSA FILHO, H. G. 700 1 $aBIZZO, H. R. 700 1 $aANTONIASSI, R. 773 $tEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition$gv. 71, n. 8, p. 1022-1023, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
Data corrente: |
06/03/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
04/10/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
GIUSTINA, C. D.; MONTEIRO, R. A. C.; ROMANO, M. R.; CARVALHO, C. A. B. de. |
Afiliação: |
CAROLINA DELLA GIUSTINA, UFRRJ; ROBERTA APARECIDA C MONTEIRO, CPAMT; MARCELO RIBEIRO ROMANO, CNPMF; CARLOS AUGUSTO BRANDÃO DE CARVALHO, UFRRJ. |
Título: |
Size of fruit trees in final implementation phase of silvopastoral system for dairy calves. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado. Produção animal para as novas gerações: anais. Gramado: SBZ, 2016. Não paginado. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The tree growth rate in the implementation phase of silvopastoral system can determine a successful system. Thus, the fastest fruit tree species are more interesting because the animal input happens earlier. So, the knowledge about the size of fruit tree species after implementation period defines the suitable time to introduce animals into the system. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa, Sinop-MT, Brazil. The silvopastoral systems were implemented in October, 2013 and the evaluations were made in July, 2015, when the trees were 21 months old. A completely randomized block design was adopted, with two replications of area per treatment. The fruit tree species were cajá; red guava; cashew var. CCP76 and EMB51; acerola var. Roxinha and Sertaneja. The measurements were canopy height, trunk height and diameter using a 3-m graduated rule and digital caliper rule. The canopy height corresponded the distance from the base (soil level) to the top of canopy. The trunk height was the distance from the soil level to the base of the canopy and, finally, the trunk diameter was taken in the base close to soil level. The analysis of variance was performed using the PROC Mixed procedure. Means were compared using PDIFF at 5% probability. The software utilized for statistical analysis was SAS 9.2. The guava tree showed the greatest height (231 ± 14 cm) (P=0.0004), followed by cashew EMB51 (180 ± 14 cm), and other species had similar canopy height (154 ± 14 cm) in July 2015. Red guava tree also had a trunk taller, similar to cashews and cajá (48 ± 5 cm) (P=0.1464). However, the red guava tree showed an intermediate trunk diameter (53 ± 5 cm) when compared to cashew EMB51 and cajá tree (64 ± 5 mm) (P=0.0005). The acerola trees were similar to red guava tree, trunks thinner. Porfírio-da-Silva et al. (2012) showed that plants with a trunk diameter bellow 62 mm were more vulnerable to animal presence than trees thicker. Additionally, Zanotti et al. (2015) cited that the height withers in 3 months old dairy heifers were 1.023 m. So, in all of 21 months old fruit trees, dairy heifers would reach the canopy if they want. But, just cajá tree and cashew EMB51 could suffer fewer damages. The other species should grow more time to support the animal presence. A caveat must be considered is cajá tree lost its leaves in early part of dry season in the 2 years evaluated. So, the cajá without leaves in dry season could not offer shade for animals in this period. MenosThe tree growth rate in the implementation phase of silvopastoral system can determine a successful system. Thus, the fastest fruit tree species are more interesting because the animal input happens earlier. So, the knowledge about the size of fruit tree species after implementation period defines the suitable time to introduce animals into the system. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa, Sinop-MT, Brazil. The silvopastoral systems were implemented in October, 2013 and the evaluations were made in July, 2015, when the trees were 21 months old. A completely randomized block design was adopted, with two replications of area per treatment. The fruit tree species were cajá; red guava; cashew var. CCP76 and EMB51; acerola var. Roxinha and Sertaneja. The measurements were canopy height, trunk height and diameter using a 3-m graduated rule and digital caliper rule. The canopy height corresponded the distance from the base (soil level) to the top of canopy. The trunk height was the distance from the soil level to the base of the canopy and, finally, the trunk diameter was taken in the base close to soil level. The analysis of variance was performed using the PROC Mixed procedure. Means were compared using PDIFF at 5% probability. The software utilized for statistical analysis was SAS 9.2. The guava tree showed the greatest height (231 ± 14 cm) (P=0.0004), followed by cashew EMB51 (180 ± 14 cm), and other species had similar canopy height (154 ± 14 cm) in July 2015. Red guava t... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Red guava. |
Thesagro: |
Acerola; Cajá; Fruta tropical. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Cashew fruit; Diameter; Height. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 03262nam a2200229 a 4500 001 2066268 005 2020-10-04 008 2016 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aGIUSTINA, C. D. 245 $aSize of fruit trees in final implementation phase of silvopastoral system for dairy calves.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 53., 2016, Gramado. Produção animal para as novas gerações: anais. Gramado: SBZ, 2016. Não paginado.$c2016 520 $aThe tree growth rate in the implementation phase of silvopastoral system can determine a successful system. Thus, the fastest fruit tree species are more interesting because the animal input happens earlier. So, the knowledge about the size of fruit tree species after implementation period defines the suitable time to introduce animals into the system. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa, Sinop-MT, Brazil. The silvopastoral systems were implemented in October, 2013 and the evaluations were made in July, 2015, when the trees were 21 months old. A completely randomized block design was adopted, with two replications of area per treatment. The fruit tree species were cajá; red guava; cashew var. CCP76 and EMB51; acerola var. Roxinha and Sertaneja. The measurements were canopy height, trunk height and diameter using a 3-m graduated rule and digital caliper rule. The canopy height corresponded the distance from the base (soil level) to the top of canopy. The trunk height was the distance from the soil level to the base of the canopy and, finally, the trunk diameter was taken in the base close to soil level. The analysis of variance was performed using the PROC Mixed procedure. Means were compared using PDIFF at 5% probability. The software utilized for statistical analysis was SAS 9.2. The guava tree showed the greatest height (231 ± 14 cm) (P=0.0004), followed by cashew EMB51 (180 ± 14 cm), and other species had similar canopy height (154 ± 14 cm) in July 2015. Red guava tree also had a trunk taller, similar to cashews and cajá (48 ± 5 cm) (P=0.1464). However, the red guava tree showed an intermediate trunk diameter (53 ± 5 cm) when compared to cashew EMB51 and cajá tree (64 ± 5 mm) (P=0.0005). The acerola trees were similar to red guava tree, trunks thinner. Porfírio-da-Silva et al. (2012) showed that plants with a trunk diameter bellow 62 mm were more vulnerable to animal presence than trees thicker. Additionally, Zanotti et al. (2015) cited that the height withers in 3 months old dairy heifers were 1.023 m. So, in all of 21 months old fruit trees, dairy heifers would reach the canopy if they want. But, just cajá tree and cashew EMB51 could suffer fewer damages. The other species should grow more time to support the animal presence. A caveat must be considered is cajá tree lost its leaves in early part of dry season in the 2 years evaluated. So, the cajá without leaves in dry season could not offer shade for animals in this period. 650 $aCashew fruit 650 $aDiameter 650 $aHeight 650 $aAcerola 650 $aCajá 650 $aFruta tropical 653 $aRed guava 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, R. A. C. 700 1 $aROMANO, M. R. 700 1 $aCARVALHO, C. A. B. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|