| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 272 | |
| Registros recuperados : 272 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/02/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/02/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MARCHINI, S.; BOULHOSA, R.; CAMARGO, J.; CAMILO, A. R.; CONCONE, H.; FELICIANI, F.; FERRARDO, I.; FIGUEIROA, G.; FRAGOSO, C. E.; MORATO, R.; PORFÍRIO, G.; SALOMÃO JUNIOR, J.; SAMPAIO, R.; SANTOS, C. C.; TORTATO, F. R.; VIANA, D.; TOMAS, W. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
SILVIO MARCHINI, INSTITUTO PRÓ-CARNÍVOROS, São Paulo; RICARDO BOULHOSA, INSTITUTO PRÓ-CARNÍVOROS, São Paulo; JULIANA CAMARGO, AMPARA, São Paulo; ANDRE RESTEL CAMILO, SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE; HENRIQUE CONCONE, INSTITUTO PRÓ-CARNÍVOROS, São Paulo; FELIPE FELICIANI, WWF-Brasil; ISABELLA FERRARDO, WWF-Brasil; GUSTAVO FIGUEIROA, SOS Pantanal; CARLOS EDUARDO FRAGOSO, ASSOCIAÇÃO ONÇAFARI, São Paulo; RONALDO MORATO, CENAP-ICMBio, Atibaia; GRASIELA PORFIRIO, INSTITUTO HOMEM PANTANEIRO, Corumbá; JORGE SALOMAO JUNIOR, AMPARA, São Paulo; RICARDO SAMPAIO, CENAP-ICMBio; CYNTIA CAVALCANTI SANTOS, WWF-Brasil; FERNANDO RODRIGO TORTATO, PANTHERA, Cuiabá; DIEGO VIANA, INSTITUTO HOMEM PANTANEIRO, Corumbá; WALFRIDO MORAES TOMAS, CPAP. |
|
Título: |
A systems approach to planning for human-wildlife coexistence: The case of people and jaguars in the Brazilian Pantanal. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2024 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Conservation Science and Practice, v. 6, n. 2, e13082, Feb. 2024. |
|
ISSN: |
2578-4854 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13082 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Human-wildlife coexistence as a concept and management objective has received increasing attention from researchers and decision makers. The coexistence approach will benefit from the recognition that, at broader scales, human-wildlife interactions (HWI) are best understood and managed collaboratively and as complex systems, that is, dynamic, non-linear, emergent, adaptive and, therefore, unpredictable. We present a planning process for human-wildlife coexistence that provides a platform for collaboration between researchers and decision-makers—and other stakeholders as well—and recognizes the complex nature of HWI. The three elements that define the process are: coexistence instead of conservation or conflict mitigation as a goal, systems thinking as the approach, and an emphasis on verifiable results rather than actions. As a way of illustration, we describe a 3-day planning workshop for human-jaguar coexistence in the Pantanal, Brazil. The 15 participants representing the academic, governmental, and non-profit sectors identified 12 interactions directly involving 27 stakeholders and indirectly another 55. A theory of change was produced, connecting 20 actions—to be performed by 22 actors—with the 57 factors that directly and indirectly drive the interactions. How these results complement other approaches such as Action Plans is discussed. The proposed approach favors the pragmatism of adaptive co-management over the often unrealistic expectation of a linear path to solution, or in other words, a shift from the notion of human-wildlife coexistence as a quantifiable target to that of coexistence as a desired system state. MenosHuman-wildlife coexistence as a concept and management objective has received increasing attention from researchers and decision makers. The coexistence approach will benefit from the recognition that, at broader scales, human-wildlife interactions (HWI) are best understood and managed collaboratively and as complex systems, that is, dynamic, non-linear, emergent, adaptive and, therefore, unpredictable. We present a planning process for human-wildlife coexistence that provides a platform for collaboration between researchers and decision-makers—and other stakeholders as well—and recognizes the complex nature of HWI. The three elements that define the process are: coexistence instead of conservation or conflict mitigation as a goal, systems thinking as the approach, and an emphasis on verifiable results rather than actions. As a way of illustration, we describe a 3-day planning workshop for human-jaguar coexistence in the Pantanal, Brazil. The 15 participants representing the academic, governmental, and non-profit sectors identified 12 interactions directly involving 27 stakeholders and indirectly another 55. A theory of change was produced, connecting 20 actions—to be performed by 22 actors—with the 57 factors that directly and indirectly drive the interactions. How these results complement other approaches such as Action Plans is discussed. The proposed approach favors the pragmatism of adaptive co-management over the often unrealistic expectation of a linear path to soluti... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Abordagem de sistemas; Social-ecological system; Systems thinking; Theory of change. |
|
Thesagro: |
Animal Selvagem; Panthera Onça. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Human-wildlife relations; Monitoring; Pantanal. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1161978/1/csp-2024.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02944naa a2200445 a 4500
001 2161978
005 2024-02-15
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2578-4854
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13082$2DOI
100 1 $aMARCHINI, S.
245 $aA systems approach to planning for human-wildlife coexistence$bThe case of people and jaguars in the Brazilian Pantanal.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
520 $aHuman-wildlife coexistence as a concept and management objective has received increasing attention from researchers and decision makers. The coexistence approach will benefit from the recognition that, at broader scales, human-wildlife interactions (HWI) are best understood and managed collaboratively and as complex systems, that is, dynamic, non-linear, emergent, adaptive and, therefore, unpredictable. We present a planning process for human-wildlife coexistence that provides a platform for collaboration between researchers and decision-makers—and other stakeholders as well—and recognizes the complex nature of HWI. The three elements that define the process are: coexistence instead of conservation or conflict mitigation as a goal, systems thinking as the approach, and an emphasis on verifiable results rather than actions. As a way of illustration, we describe a 3-day planning workshop for human-jaguar coexistence in the Pantanal, Brazil. The 15 participants representing the academic, governmental, and non-profit sectors identified 12 interactions directly involving 27 stakeholders and indirectly another 55. A theory of change was produced, connecting 20 actions—to be performed by 22 actors—with the 57 factors that directly and indirectly drive the interactions. How these results complement other approaches such as Action Plans is discussed. The proposed approach favors the pragmatism of adaptive co-management over the often unrealistic expectation of a linear path to solution, or in other words, a shift from the notion of human-wildlife coexistence as a quantifiable target to that of coexistence as a desired system state.
650 $aHuman-wildlife relations
650 $aMonitoring
650 $aPantanal
650 $aAnimal Selvagem
650 $aPanthera Onça
653 $aAbordagem de sistemas
653 $aSocial-ecological system
653 $aSystems thinking
653 $aTheory of change
700 1 $aBOULHOSA, R.
700 1 $aCAMARGO, J.
700 1 $aCAMILO, A. R.
700 1 $aCONCONE, H.
700 1 $aFELICIANI, F.
700 1 $aFERRARDO, I.
700 1 $aFIGUEIROA, G.
700 1 $aFRAGOSO, C. E.
700 1 $aMORATO, R.
700 1 $aPORFÍRIO, G.
700 1 $aSALOMÃO JUNIOR, J.
700 1 $aSAMPAIO, R.
700 1 $aSANTOS, C. C.
700 1 $aTORTATO, F. R.
700 1 $aVIANA, D.
700 1 $aTOMAS, W. M.
773 $tConservation Science and Practice$gv. 6, n. 2, e13082, Feb. 2024.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
