02944naa a2200445 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902200140006002400440007410000170011824501480013526000090028352016630029265000290195565000150198465000130199965000200201265000190203265300260205165300290207765300210210665300210212770000170214870000160216570000180218170000160219970000180221570000170223370000180225070000190226870000150228770000180230270000240232070000160234470000180236070000190237870000140239770000170241177300700242821619782024-02-15       2024    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d  a2578-48547 ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.130822DOI1 aMARCHINI, S.  aA systems approach to planning for human-wildlife coexistencebThe case of people and jaguars in the Brazilian Pantanal.h[electronic resource]  c2024  aHuman-wildlife coexistence as a concept and management objective has received increasing attention from researchers and decision makers. The coexistence approach will benefit from the recognition that, at broader scales, human-wildlife interactions (HWI) are best understood and managed collaboratively and as complex systems, that is, dynamic, non-linear, emergent, adaptive and, therefore, unpredictable. We present a planning process for human-wildlife coexistence that provides a platform for collaboration between researchers and decision-makers—and other stakeholders as well—and recognizes the complex nature of HWI. The three elements that define the process are: coexistence instead of conservation or conflict mitigation as a goal, systems thinking as the approach, and an emphasis on verifiable results rather than actions. As a way of illustration, we describe a 3-day planning workshop for human-jaguar coexistence in the Pantanal, Brazil. The 15 participants representing the academic, governmental, and non-profit sectors identified 12 interactions directly involving 27 stakeholders and indirectly another 55. A theory of change was produced, connecting 20 actions—to be performed by 22 actors—with the 57 factors that directly and indirectly drive the interactions. How these results complement other approaches such as Action Plans is discussed. The proposed approach favors the pragmatism of adaptive co-management over the often unrealistic expectation of a linear path to solution, or in other words, a shift from the notion of human-wildlife coexistence as a quantifiable target to that of coexistence as a desired system state.  aHuman-wildlife relations  aMonitoring  aPantanal  aAnimal Selvagem  aPanthera Onça  aAbordagem de sistemas  aSocial-ecological system  aSystems thinking  aTheory of change1 aBOULHOSA, R.1 aCAMARGO, J.1 aCAMILO, A. R.1 aCONCONE, H.1 aFELICIANI, F.1 aFERRARDO, I.1 aFIGUEIROA, G.1 aFRAGOSO, C. E.1 aMORATO, R.1 aPORFÍRIO, G.1 aSALOMÃO JUNIOR, J.1 aSAMPAIO, R.1 aSANTOS, C. C.1 aTORTATO, F. R.1 aVIANA, D.1 aTOMAS, W. M.  tConservation Science and Practicegv. 6, n. 2, e13082, Feb. 2024.