| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 53 | |
| Registros recuperados : 53 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Unidades Centrais. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Hortaliças; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/06/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/06/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
NAVARRO, Z. S. de; PEDROSO, M. T. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
ZANDER SOARES DE NAVARRO, SUEST; MARIA THEREZA MACEDO PEDROSO, CNPH. |
|
Título: |
The (un)feasibility of inclusive rural development in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SONDERGAARD, N.; SÁ, C. D. de; PLATIAU, A. F. B. (ed.). Sustainability challenges of brazilian agriculture: governance, inclusion, and innovation. Cham : Springer, 2023. p. 229-248. |
|
Série: |
(Environment & Policy, 64). |
|
ISBN: |
978-3-031-29853-0 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29853-0_12 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: This chapter extracts the main lessons about the process of contemporary agrarian development in Brazil. In the 1970s, a strong state-supported modernization was launched, leading to the emergence of an economy moved almost exclusively by productivity and proft-seeking. The Brazilian agricultural sector is now considered as one of the most successful global agro-food producers. The chapter comments on two related topics. The frst highlights the diffculties to overcome the dichotomy of ?agricultural production? versus ?the environment.? Widespread deforestation, for example, continues to take place, especially in vulnerable biomes such as the savanna-type Cerrado and the Amazon. Still, and more problematic, a good proportion of this environmental impact is protected by law, and one cannot envisage a political decision aimed at stopping deforestation in those regions. The second objective concerns the (un)feasibility of attempts (concrete or discursive) to implement projects of ?inclusive rural development? in the country. Many reasons sustain this proposition, but perhaps the main one is the actual vanishing of the old ?agrarian question.? This is due to an empirical fact; the former rural poor have now become the urban poor, and thus the question ?rural development for whom?? remains unanswered. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Inclusão Social. |
|
Thesagro: |
Desenvolvimento Agrícola; Desenvolvimento Rural; Desenvolvimento Socio-Econômico; Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Desmatamento; Impacto Ambiental; Meio Ambiente; Política Agrária. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
B Sociologia Rural |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02360naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2154261
005 2023-06-12
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-3-031-29853-0
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29853-0_12$2DOI
100 1 $aNAVARRO, Z. S. de
245 $aThe (un)feasibility of inclusive rural development in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
490 $a(Environment & Policy, 64).
520 $aAbstract: This chapter extracts the main lessons about the process of contemporary agrarian development in Brazil. In the 1970s, a strong state-supported modernization was launched, leading to the emergence of an economy moved almost exclusively by productivity and proft-seeking. The Brazilian agricultural sector is now considered as one of the most successful global agro-food producers. The chapter comments on two related topics. The frst highlights the diffculties to overcome the dichotomy of ?agricultural production? versus ?the environment.? Widespread deforestation, for example, continues to take place, especially in vulnerable biomes such as the savanna-type Cerrado and the Amazon. Still, and more problematic, a good proportion of this environmental impact is protected by law, and one cannot envisage a political decision aimed at stopping deforestation in those regions. The second objective concerns the (un)feasibility of attempts (concrete or discursive) to implement projects of ?inclusive rural development? in the country. Many reasons sustain this proposition, but perhaps the main one is the actual vanishing of the old ?agrarian question.? This is due to an empirical fact; the former rural poor have now become the urban poor, and thus the question ?rural development for whom?? remains unanswered.
650 $aDesenvolvimento Agrícola
650 $aDesenvolvimento Rural
650 $aDesenvolvimento Socio-Econômico
650 $aDesenvolvimento Sustentável
650 $aDesmatamento
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
650 $aMeio Ambiente
650 $aPolítica Agrária
653 $aBrasil
653 $aInclusão Social
700 1 $aPEDROSO, M. T. M.
773 $tIn: SONDERGAARD, N.; SÁ, C. D. de; PLATIAU, A. F. B. (ed.). Sustainability challenges of brazilian agriculture: governance, inclusion, and innovation. Cham : Springer, 2023. p. 229-248.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
