|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Clima Temperado. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpact.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
Data corrente: |
03/08/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
03/08/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
DIAS, N. P.; MONTOYA, P.; NAVA, D. E. |
Afiliação: |
NAYMÃ PINTO DIAS, UFPEL; PABLO MONTOYA, Universidad Autonoma de Chiapas; DORI EDSON NAVA, CPACT. |
Título: |
A 30-year systematic review reveals success in tephritid fruit fly biological control research. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, v. 170, n. 5, p. 370-384, May 2022. |
DOI: |
10.1111/eea.13157 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) are among the main pests in horticulture, impacting field crops and export markets. The biological control of fruit flies has become an important method for environmentally friendly crop production. Although biological control is an age- old practice and the mass- rearing of some biological agents boomed in the 1990s, efforts in fruit fly control programs still face several challenges. We conducted a systematic review to investigate publications assessing the success or failure of using natural enemies against tephritid fruit flies. Our goal was to compile and summarize information from over 30 years of research on biocontrol efforts, including groups and species of control agents and fruit flies tested, methodological approaches applied, the country where the study was performed, and the scope adopted. We also analyzed effectiveness, efficiency, and success rates in biocontrol studies published from 1990 to 2021. Our review showed 2986 records, of which 225 publications matched the criteria. The most- studied biocontrol agents for the suppression of fruit flies were parasitoids, fungi, and nematodes. A few studies assessed bacteria, predators, and viruses. We found a total of 55 fruit fly species described as hosts of the biological agents. Natural/conservation biological control was the main scope studied; however, augmentative biological control had a higher rate of successful studies and potential success, followed by classical biological control. The effectiveness and efficiency parameters are discussed to provide support for researchers in future studies. MenosFruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) are among the main pests in horticulture, impacting field crops and export markets. The biological control of fruit flies has become an important method for environmentally friendly crop production. Although biological control is an age- old practice and the mass- rearing of some biological agents boomed in the 1990s, efforts in fruit fly control programs still face several challenges. We conducted a systematic review to investigate publications assessing the success or failure of using natural enemies against tephritid fruit flies. Our goal was to compile and summarize information from over 30 years of research on biocontrol efforts, including groups and species of control agents and fruit flies tested, methodological approaches applied, the country where the study was performed, and the scope adopted. We also analyzed effectiveness, efficiency, and success rates in biocontrol studies published from 1990 to 2021. Our review showed 2986 records, of which 225 publications matched the criteria. The most- studied biocontrol agents for the suppression of fruit flies were parasitoids, fungi, and nematodes. A few studies assessed bacteria, predators, and viruses. We found a total of 55 fruit fly species described as hosts of the biological agents. Natural/conservation biological control was the main scope studied; however, augmentative biological control had a higher rate of successful studies and potential success, followed by classical biologic... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Inimigo Natural; Mosca das Frutas. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02234naa a2200193 a 4500 001 2145201 005 2022-08-03 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1111/eea.13157$2DOI 100 1 $aDIAS, N. P. 245 $aA 30-year systematic review reveals success in tephritid fruit fly biological control research.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $aFruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) are among the main pests in horticulture, impacting field crops and export markets. The biological control of fruit flies has become an important method for environmentally friendly crop production. Although biological control is an age- old practice and the mass- rearing of some biological agents boomed in the 1990s, efforts in fruit fly control programs still face several challenges. We conducted a systematic review to investigate publications assessing the success or failure of using natural enemies against tephritid fruit flies. Our goal was to compile and summarize information from over 30 years of research on biocontrol efforts, including groups and species of control agents and fruit flies tested, methodological approaches applied, the country where the study was performed, and the scope adopted. We also analyzed effectiveness, efficiency, and success rates in biocontrol studies published from 1990 to 2021. Our review showed 2986 records, of which 225 publications matched the criteria. The most- studied biocontrol agents for the suppression of fruit flies were parasitoids, fungi, and nematodes. A few studies assessed bacteria, predators, and viruses. We found a total of 55 fruit fly species described as hosts of the biological agents. Natural/conservation biological control was the main scope studied; however, augmentative biological control had a higher rate of successful studies and potential success, followed by classical biological control. The effectiveness and efficiency parameters are discussed to provide support for researchers in future studies. 650 $aControle Biológico 650 $aInimigo Natural 650 $aMosca das Frutas 700 1 $aMONTOYA, P. 700 1 $aNAVA, D. E. 773 $tEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata$gv. 170, n. 5, p. 370-384, May 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
12/01/1997 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/04/1997 |
Autoria: |
CARRAO-PANIZZI, M.C. |
Afiliação: |
EMBRAPA-CNPSo. Londrina, PR. |
Título: |
Avaliacao de cultivares de soja quanto aos teores de isoflavonoides. |
Ano de publicação: |
1996 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, Brasilia, v.31, n.10, p.691-698, out. 1996. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Foram avaliados, por cromatografia liquida de alto desempenho (HPLC), os teores de isoflavonoides de 100 cultivares de soja (Glycine max (L.) Merrill), do banco de germoplasma do Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Soja (CNPSo/EMBRAPA), semeadas na safra 1993-94. FT-Canarana, UFV-9, BABR-31 e FT-13, apresentaram os menores teores de isoflavonoides (16,78; 22,26; 25,56; e 29,58 mg/100 g, respectivamente), ao passo que EMBRAPA-20 apresentou o teor mais elevado (172,94 mg/100 g). Altas temperaturas (media > 24o.C) durante o desenvolvimento de graos diminuiram os teores de isoflavonoides. Cultivares semeadas em Porangatu, GO (13o. de latitude S), apresentaram menores teores de isoflavonoides, do que cultivares semeadas em Londrina, PR, (23o. 12' de latitude S,) provavelmente como consequencia das diferencas em temperatura nos dois locais. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Daidzina; Genistina; Isoflanoids; Isoflavonoide; Parana; Soybean. |
Thesagro: |
Glycine Max; Soja. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil; daidzin; genistin. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CNPSO/1431/1/pab96_03_out.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/AI-SEDE/19336/1/pab96_03_out.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01519naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1444793 005 1997-04-10 008 1996 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCARRAO-PANIZZI, M.C. 245 $aAvaliacao de cultivares de soja quanto aos teores de isoflavonoides. 260 $c1996 520 $aForam avaliados, por cromatografia liquida de alto desempenho (HPLC), os teores de isoflavonoides de 100 cultivares de soja (Glycine max (L.) Merrill), do banco de germoplasma do Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Soja (CNPSo/EMBRAPA), semeadas na safra 1993-94. FT-Canarana, UFV-9, BABR-31 e FT-13, apresentaram os menores teores de isoflavonoides (16,78; 22,26; 25,56; e 29,58 mg/100 g, respectivamente), ao passo que EMBRAPA-20 apresentou o teor mais elevado (172,94 mg/100 g). Altas temperaturas (media > 24o.C) durante o desenvolvimento de graos diminuiram os teores de isoflavonoides. Cultivares semeadas em Porangatu, GO (13o. de latitude S), apresentaram menores teores de isoflavonoides, do que cultivares semeadas em Londrina, PR, (23o. 12' de latitude S,) provavelmente como consequencia das diferencas em temperatura nos dois locais. 650 $aBrazil 650 $adaidzin 650 $agenistin 650 $aGlycine Max 650 $aSoja 653 $aBrasil 653 $aDaidzina 653 $aGenistina 653 $aIsoflanoids 653 $aIsoflavonoide 653 $aParana 653 $aSoybean 773 $tPesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, Brasilia$gv.31, n.10, p.691-698, out. 1996.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|