| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
| 5. |  | BILOTTA, P.; KUNZ, A.; VIVAN, M. L.; BORTOLI, M.; SOARES, H. M. Efeito do pH, alcalinidade, concentração de amônia e nitrito no desempenho do tratamento biológico de dejeto suíno em um reator sequencial desnitrificante-nitrificante. In: SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE GERENCIAMENTO DE RESÍDUOS AGROPECUÁRIOS E AGROINDUSTRIAIS, 3., 2013, São Pedro, SP. Anais... São Pedro, SP: SBERA, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|    |
| 6. | | VIVAN, M. L.; KUNZ, A.; BORTOLI, M.; BILOTTA, P.; SOARES, H. M. Comparativo da atividade nitrificante com e sem reator desnitrificante no tratamento de dejeto suíno. In: SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE GERENCIAMENTO DE RESÍDUOS AGROPECUÁRIOS E AGROINDUSTRIAIS, 3., 2013, São Pedro, SP. Anais... São Pedro, SP: SBERA, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| 7. | | GRESSLER, V.; BILOTTA, P.; STEINMETZ, R. L. R.; BORTOLI, M.; KUNZ, A. A SPE-LC-MS/MS method for veterinary antiobic analysis in swine manure. In: SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE GERENCIAMENTO DE RESÍDUOS AGROPECUÁRIOS E AGROINDUSTRIAIS, 3., 2013, São Pedro, SP. Anais... São Pedro, SP: SBERA, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/03/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/04/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
BILOTTA, P.; KUNZ, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
PATRÍCIA BILOTTA, Universidade Positivo; AIRTON KUNZ, CNPSA. |
|
Título: |
Swine manure post-treatment technologies for pathogenic organism inactivation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Engenharia Agrícola, v. 33, n. 2, p. 422-431, 2013. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Swine manure agricultural use is a common practice in Brazil. Their physic-chemical characteristics favor its use as biofertilizer, but the presence of pathogens may become a risk to human health. This research presents a qualitative study of the main alternatives of pig manure disinfection, analyzing efficiency, advantages and limitations of each procedure. The disinfection studies reported in literature are based on the following treatments: alkaline, thermal, biological, chemical, and physical. The greater efficiencies are in thermal treatment (> 4 log: 60 °C), chemical treatment (3 to 4 log: 30 mg Cl- L-1; 3 to 4 log: 40 mg O3 L-1) and physical treatment (3 a 4 log: 220 mJ UV radiation cm-2). The biological treatment (anaerobiosis) also promotes the pathogen reduction of swine manure, however with lower efficiency (1 to 2 log). The selection of the treatment should consider: implementation and operation cost, necessity of preliminary treatment, efficiency obtained and destination of the treated manure (agricultural use, water reuse). Brazilian regulation does not have specific guidelines for the microbiological quality of animal production effluents that is very important to be considered due to confined animal feeding operation transformation in the last years in the country. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Efluente; Physical treatment; Tratamento físico; Tratamento químico. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biossegurança; Dejeto; Suíno. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biosecurity; Chemical treatment; Effluents; Pig manure. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02028naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2012504
005 2015-04-09
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBILOTTA, P.
245 $aSwine manure post-treatment technologies for pathogenic organism inactivation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
520 $aSwine manure agricultural use is a common practice in Brazil. Their physic-chemical characteristics favor its use as biofertilizer, but the presence of pathogens may become a risk to human health. This research presents a qualitative study of the main alternatives of pig manure disinfection, analyzing efficiency, advantages and limitations of each procedure. The disinfection studies reported in literature are based on the following treatments: alkaline, thermal, biological, chemical, and physical. The greater efficiencies are in thermal treatment (> 4 log: 60 °C), chemical treatment (3 to 4 log: 30 mg Cl- L-1; 3 to 4 log: 40 mg O3 L-1) and physical treatment (3 a 4 log: 220 mJ UV radiation cm-2). The biological treatment (anaerobiosis) also promotes the pathogen reduction of swine manure, however with lower efficiency (1 to 2 log). The selection of the treatment should consider: implementation and operation cost, necessity of preliminary treatment, efficiency obtained and destination of the treated manure (agricultural use, water reuse). Brazilian regulation does not have specific guidelines for the microbiological quality of animal production effluents that is very important to be considered due to confined animal feeding operation transformation in the last years in the country.
650 $aBiosecurity
650 $aChemical treatment
650 $aEffluents
650 $aPig manure
650 $aBiossegurança
650 $aDejeto
650 $aSuíno
653 $aEfluente
653 $aPhysical treatment
653 $aTratamento físico
653 $aTratamento químico
700 1 $aKUNZ, A.
773 $tEngenharia Agrícola$gv. 33, n. 2, p. 422-431, 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
