02028naa a2200265 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001910000160006024501060007626000090018252013090019165000160150065000230151665000140153965000150155365000190156865000110158765000110159865300130160965300230162265300230164565300240166870000130169277300570170520125042015-04-09       2013    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d1 aBILOTTA, P.  aSwine manure post-treatment technologies for pathogenic organism inactivation.h[electronic resource]  c2013  aSwine manure agricultural use is a common practice in Brazil. Their physic-chemical characteristics favor its use as biofertilizer, but the presence of pathogens may become a risk to human health. This research presents a qualitative study of the main alternatives of pig manure disinfection, analyzing efficiency, advantages and limitations of each procedure. The disinfection studies reported in literature are based on the following treatments: alkaline, thermal, biological, chemical, and physical. The greater efficiencies are in thermal treatment (&gt 4 log: 60 °C), chemical treatment (3 to 4 log: 30 mg Cl- L-1; 3 to 4 log: 40 mg O3 L-1) and physical treatment (3 a 4 log: 220 mJ UV radiation cm-2). The biological treatment (anaerobiosis) also promotes the pathogen reduction of swine manure, however with lower efficiency (1 to 2 log). The selection of the treatment should consider: implementation and operation cost, necessity of preliminary treatment, efficiency obtained and destination of the treated manure (agricultural use, water reuse). Brazilian regulation does not have specific guidelines for the microbiological quality of animal production effluents that is very important to be considered due to confined animal feeding operation transformation in the last years in the country.  aBiosecurity  aChemical treatment  aEffluents  aPig manure  aBiossegurança  aDejeto  aSuíno  aEfluente  aPhysical treatment  aTratamento físico  aTratamento químico1 aKUNZ, A.  tEngenharia Agrícolagv. 33, n. 2, p. 422-431, 2013.