| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Solos; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/10/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
PRADO, R. B.; FIDALGO, E. C. C.; MONTEIRO, J. M. G.; SCHULER, A. E.; VEZZANI, F. M.; GARCIA, J. R.; OLIVEIRA, A. P. de; VIANA, J. H. M.; PEDREIRA, B. da C. C. G.; MENDES, I. de C.; REATTO, A.; PARRON, L. M.; CLEMENTE, E. de P.; DONAGEMMA, G. K.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; SIMÕES, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
RACHEL BARDY PRADO, CNPS; ELAINE CRISTINA CARDOSO FIDALGO, CNPS; JOYCE MARIA GUIMARAES MONTEIRO, CNPS; AZENETH EUFRAUSINO SCHULER, CNPS; FABIANE MACHADO VEZZANI, UFPR; JUNIOR RUIZ GARCIA, UFPR; ALINE PACOBAHYBA DE OLIVEIRA, CNPS; JOAO HERBERT MOREIRA VIANA, CNPMS; BERNADETE DA CONCEICAO C G PEDREIRA, CNPS; IEDA DE CARVALHO MENDES, CPAC; ADRIANA REATTO DOS SANTOS BRAGA, SCT; LUCILIA MARIA PARRON VARGAS, CNPF; ELIANE DE PAULA CLEMENTE ALMEIDA, CNPS; GUILHERME KANGUSSU DONAGEMMA, CNPS; ANA PAULA DIAS TURETTA, CNPS; MARGARETH GONCALVES SIMOES, CNPS. |
|
Título: |
Current overview and potential applications of the soil ecosystem services approach in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 51, n. 9, p. 1021-1038, set. 2016. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000900002 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT: Human pressure on ecosystems has undesirable impacts on human well-being. After the Millennium Project, much interdisciplinary research has been developed worldwide aiming to understand these impacts on ecosystem flows and processes, and to learn about the costs and the benefits of ecosystem services for production. Soil provides many ecosystem services, since its multi-functionality is the basis for food production, water filtration, nutrient cycling, and other goods essential to life. This article presents the main concepts and classifications of soil ecosystem services and of its functions; the indicators and the methods for assessment, modeling, and valuation of ecosystem services; some recent applications to assess and evaluate impacts of agricultural management practices on soil ecosystem services; as well as challenges and opportunities for research and for development of public policies related to agro-environmental sustainability in Brazil. Although the role of soil in supplying ecosystem services is yet undervalued, scientists are gradually recognizing soil processes and functions as fundamental to assess ecosystem services and the effects of land use and management on them. Interdisciplinary approaches to integrate science and public policies are necessary to build governance based on ecosystem services. RESUMO: A pressão humana sobre os serviços ecossistêmicos tem resultado em impactos indesejáveis sobre o bem-estar humano. Com o Projeto Millennium, várias pesquisas interdisciplinares têm sido desenvolvidas em todo o mundo com o objetivo de entender esses impactos sobre os fluxos e os processos dos ecossistemas e internalizar os custos e os benefícios dos serviços ecossistêmicos para a produção. O solo fornece muitos serviços ecossistêmicos, uma vez que sua multifuncionalidade é a base para a produção de alimentos, filtração de água, ciclagem de nutrientes e outros bens essenciais à vida. Este artigo apresenta os principais conceitos e classificações dos serviços ecossistêmicos do solo e de suas funções; os indicadores e os métodos de avaliação, modelagem e valoração dos serviços ecossistêmicos; algumas aplicações recentes para avaliar impactos de práticas de manejo agrícola sobre os serviços ecossistêmicos do solo; bem como os desafios e as oportunidades para a pesquisa e para o desenvolvimento de políticas públicas relacionadas à sustentabilidade agroambiental no Brasil. Apesar de o papel do solo para prestação de serviços ecossistêmicos ainda ser subestimado, os cientistas têm gradualmente reconhecido os processos e as funções do solo como fundamentais para avaliar os serviços ecossistêmicos e os efeitos do uso e manejo da terra sobre eles. Abordagens interdisciplinares que integrem ciência e políticas públicas são necessárias para construir uma governança com base em serviços ecossistêmicos. MenosABSTRACT: Human pressure on ecosystems has undesirable impacts on human well-being. After the Millennium Project, much interdisciplinary research has been developed worldwide aiming to understand these impacts on ecosystem flows and processes, and to learn about the costs and the benefits of ecosystem services for production. Soil provides many ecosystem services, since its multi-functionality is the basis for food production, water filtration, nutrient cycling, and other goods essential to life. This article presents the main concepts and classifications of soil ecosystem services and of its functions; the indicators and the methods for assessment, modeling, and valuation of ecosystem services; some recent applications to assess and evaluate impacts of agricultural management practices on soil ecosystem services; as well as challenges and opportunities for research and for development of public policies related to agro-environmental sustainability in Brazil. Although the role of soil in supplying ecosystem services is yet undervalued, scientists are gradually recognizing soil processes and functions as fundamental to assess ecosystem services and the effects of land use and management on them. Interdisciplinary approaches to integrate science and public policies are necessary to build governance based on ecosystem services. RESUMO: A pressão humana sobre os serviços ecossistêmicos tem resultado em impactos indesejáveis sobre o bem-estar humano. Com o Projeto Millennium, vár... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Função do solo; Indicadores de solo; Política pública; Qualidade do solo; Serviço ambiental; Serviços ambientais; Soil function; Soil indicators; Valoração econômica. |
|
Thesagro: |
Manejo do solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Economic valuation; Ecosystem services; Public policy; Soil management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/149072/1/2016-048.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04363naa a2200481 a 4500
001 2055160
005 2021-11-10
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000900002$2DOI
100 1 $aPRADO, R. B.
245 $aCurrent overview and potential applications of the soil ecosystem services approach in Brazil.
260 $c2016
520 $aABSTRACT: Human pressure on ecosystems has undesirable impacts on human well-being. After the Millennium Project, much interdisciplinary research has been developed worldwide aiming to understand these impacts on ecosystem flows and processes, and to learn about the costs and the benefits of ecosystem services for production. Soil provides many ecosystem services, since its multi-functionality is the basis for food production, water filtration, nutrient cycling, and other goods essential to life. This article presents the main concepts and classifications of soil ecosystem services and of its functions; the indicators and the methods for assessment, modeling, and valuation of ecosystem services; some recent applications to assess and evaluate impacts of agricultural management practices on soil ecosystem services; as well as challenges and opportunities for research and for development of public policies related to agro-environmental sustainability in Brazil. Although the role of soil in supplying ecosystem services is yet undervalued, scientists are gradually recognizing soil processes and functions as fundamental to assess ecosystem services and the effects of land use and management on them. Interdisciplinary approaches to integrate science and public policies are necessary to build governance based on ecosystem services. RESUMO: A pressão humana sobre os serviços ecossistêmicos tem resultado em impactos indesejáveis sobre o bem-estar humano. Com o Projeto Millennium, várias pesquisas interdisciplinares têm sido desenvolvidas em todo o mundo com o objetivo de entender esses impactos sobre os fluxos e os processos dos ecossistemas e internalizar os custos e os benefícios dos serviços ecossistêmicos para a produção. O solo fornece muitos serviços ecossistêmicos, uma vez que sua multifuncionalidade é a base para a produção de alimentos, filtração de água, ciclagem de nutrientes e outros bens essenciais à vida. Este artigo apresenta os principais conceitos e classificações dos serviços ecossistêmicos do solo e de suas funções; os indicadores e os métodos de avaliação, modelagem e valoração dos serviços ecossistêmicos; algumas aplicações recentes para avaliar impactos de práticas de manejo agrícola sobre os serviços ecossistêmicos do solo; bem como os desafios e as oportunidades para a pesquisa e para o desenvolvimento de políticas públicas relacionadas à sustentabilidade agroambiental no Brasil. Apesar de o papel do solo para prestação de serviços ecossistêmicos ainda ser subestimado, os cientistas têm gradualmente reconhecido os processos e as funções do solo como fundamentais para avaliar os serviços ecossistêmicos e os efeitos do uso e manejo da terra sobre eles. Abordagens interdisciplinares que integrem ciência e políticas públicas são necessárias para construir uma governança com base em serviços ecossistêmicos.
650 $aEconomic valuation
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aPublic policy
650 $aSoil management
650 $aManejo do solo
653 $aFunção do solo
653 $aIndicadores de solo
653 $aPolítica pública
653 $aQualidade do solo
653 $aServiço ambiental
653 $aServiços ambientais
653 $aSoil function
653 $aSoil indicators
653 $aValoração econômica
700 1 $aFIDALGO, E. C. C.
700 1 $aMONTEIRO, J. M. G.
700 1 $aSCHULER, A. E.
700 1 $aVEZZANI, F. M.
700 1 $aGARCIA, J. R.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. P. de
700 1 $aVIANA, J. H. M.
700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. da C. C. G.
700 1 $aMENDES, I. de C.
700 1 $aREATTO, A.
700 1 $aPARRON, L. M.
700 1 $aCLEMENTE, E. de P.
700 1 $aDONAGEMMA, G. K.
700 1 $aTURETTA, A. P. D.
700 1 $aSIMÕES, M.
773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF$gv. 51, n. 9, p. 1021-1038, set. 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/09/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/09/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
McCAY, T. S.; BROWN, G. G.; CALLAHAM JUNIOR, Mac A.; CHANG, C-H; DAVOLOS, A.; DOBSON, A.; GORRES, J. H.; HERRICK, B. M.; JAMES, S. W.; JOHNSTON, M. R.; McHUGH, D.; MINTEER, T.; MOORE, J.-D.; NOURI-AIIN, M.; NOVO, M.; ORTIZ-PACHAR, J.; PINDER, R. A.; RICHARDSON, J. B.; SNYDER, B. A.; SZLAVECZ, K. |
|
Afiliação: |
Timothy S. McCay, Colgate University; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; Mac A. Callaham Jr., USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station; Chih-Han Chang, National Taiwan University; Andrea Davalos, State University of New York at Cortland; Annise Dobson, Yale University; Josef H. Gorres, University of Vermon; Bradley M. Herrick, University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum; Samuel W. James, Maharishi International University Fairfield; Marie R. Johnston, i University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum Madison; Damhnait McHugh, Colgate University; Tanya Minteer, Colgate University; Jean-David Moore, Ministe?re des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs; Maryam Nouri-Aiin, University of Vermont; Marta Novo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Jaime Ortiz-Pachar, Cornell University; Rebecca A. Pinder, Columbia-Greene Community College; Justin B. Richardson, University of Massachusetts Amhers; Bruce A. Snyder, Georgia College and State University; Katalin Szlavecz, Johns Hopkins University. |
|
Título: |
Tools for monitoring and study of peregrine pheretimoid earthworms (Megascolecidae). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pedobiologia - Journal of Soil Ecology, v. 83, 150669, 2020. 12 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2020.150669 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Peregrine pheretimoid earthworms, commonly known as jumping worms, are members of the family Megascolecidae that have become widely established outside of their native ranges. In many parts of the world this represents a second wave of earthworm invasions, following the introduction of peregrine European earthworms in the family Lumbricidae during the colonial era. Forest ecologists, turf managers, gardeners, and other land managers are concerned about the observed or presumed negative effects of jumping worms on invaded habitats. Although research on jumping worms has accelerated in recent decades, our understanding of their ecology remains limited. We compiled techniques useful to researchers working to fill voids in our understanding. Similar past efforts have focused on tools used to study common European species. Differences in life cycle, behavior, morphology, and physiology make it difficult to transfer experiences with European earthworms to pheretimoids. For example, the loss of reproductive features in many pheretimoid populations poses a challenge for identification, and techniques for individually tagging lumbricid earthworms have been less successful for megascolecids. The active and ongoing expansion of pheretimoid populations in many areas requires increased attention on distributed methods, such as citizen-science protocols, for detecting and tracking their expansion. Finally, the desire to limit populations of pheretimoids, including those invading gardens and other environments that might be successfully restored, has exposed the lack of options for targeted, effective control of unwanted earthworms. We identify opportunities to address these voids in our methodological tool kit and encourage the adaptation of techniques previously used in the study and management of other invasive animals. MenosPeregrine pheretimoid earthworms, commonly known as jumping worms, are members of the family Megascolecidae that have become widely established outside of their native ranges. In many parts of the world this represents a second wave of earthworm invasions, following the introduction of peregrine European earthworms in the family Lumbricidae during the colonial era. Forest ecologists, turf managers, gardeners, and other land managers are concerned about the observed or presumed negative effects of jumping worms on invaded habitats. Although research on jumping worms has accelerated in recent decades, our understanding of their ecology remains limited. We compiled techniques useful to researchers working to fill voids in our understanding. Similar past efforts have focused on tools used to study common European species. Differences in life cycle, behavior, morphology, and physiology make it difficult to transfer experiences with European earthworms to pheretimoids. For example, the loss of reproductive features in many pheretimoid populations poses a challenge for identification, and techniques for individually tagging lumbricid earthworms have been less successful for megascolecids. The active and ongoing expansion of pheretimoid populations in many areas requires increased attention on distributed methods, such as citizen-science protocols, for detecting and tracking their expansion. Finally, the desire to limit populations of pheretimoids, including those invading gardens a... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Espécie invasiva; Invasive earthworms; Management and control; Methods; Pheretimoids; Techniques. |
|
Thesagro: |
Manejo; Minhoca. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Megascolecidae; Research; Sampling. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03187naa a2200493 a 4500
001 2125062
005 2020-09-22
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2020.150669$2DOI
100 1 $aMcCAY, T. S.
245 $aTools for monitoring and study of peregrine pheretimoid earthworms (Megascolecidae).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aPeregrine pheretimoid earthworms, commonly known as jumping worms, are members of the family Megascolecidae that have become widely established outside of their native ranges. In many parts of the world this represents a second wave of earthworm invasions, following the introduction of peregrine European earthworms in the family Lumbricidae during the colonial era. Forest ecologists, turf managers, gardeners, and other land managers are concerned about the observed or presumed negative effects of jumping worms on invaded habitats. Although research on jumping worms has accelerated in recent decades, our understanding of their ecology remains limited. We compiled techniques useful to researchers working to fill voids in our understanding. Similar past efforts have focused on tools used to study common European species. Differences in life cycle, behavior, morphology, and physiology make it difficult to transfer experiences with European earthworms to pheretimoids. For example, the loss of reproductive features in many pheretimoid populations poses a challenge for identification, and techniques for individually tagging lumbricid earthworms have been less successful for megascolecids. The active and ongoing expansion of pheretimoid populations in many areas requires increased attention on distributed methods, such as citizen-science protocols, for detecting and tracking their expansion. Finally, the desire to limit populations of pheretimoids, including those invading gardens and other environments that might be successfully restored, has exposed the lack of options for targeted, effective control of unwanted earthworms. We identify opportunities to address these voids in our methodological tool kit and encourage the adaptation of techniques previously used in the study and management of other invasive animals.
650 $aMegascolecidae
650 $aResearch
650 $aSampling
650 $aManejo
650 $aMinhoca
653 $aEspécie invasiva
653 $aInvasive earthworms
653 $aManagement and control
653 $aMethods
653 $aPheretimoids
653 $aTechniques
700 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
700 1 $aCALLAHAM JUNIOR, Mac A.
700 1 $aCHANG, C-H
700 1 $aDAVOLOS, A.
700 1 $aDOBSON, A.
700 1 $aGORRES, J. H.
700 1 $aHERRICK, B. M.
700 1 $aJAMES, S. W.
700 1 $aJOHNSTON, M. R.
700 1 $aMcHUGH, D.
700 1 $aMINTEER, T.
700 1 $aMOORE, J.-D.
700 1 $aNOURI-AIIN, M.
700 1 $aNOVO, M.
700 1 $aORTIZ-PACHAR, J.
700 1 $aPINDER, R. A.
700 1 $aRICHARDSON, J. B.
700 1 $aSNYDER, B. A.
700 1 $aSZLAVECZ, K.
773 $tPedobiologia - Journal of Soil Ecology$gv. 83, 150669, 2020. 12 p.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
