| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/05/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/05/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SANTOS, J. D. R.; UNGERFELD, R.; BALARO, M. F. A.; SOUZA-FABJAN, J. M. G.; COSENTINO, I. O.; BRAIR, V. L.; SOUZA, C. V. de; PINTO, P. H. N.; BADE, A. L. C.; FONSECA, J. F. da; BRANDÃO, F. Z. |
|
Afiliação: |
JULIANA DANTAS RODRIGUES SANTOS, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; RODOLFO UNGERFELD, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República - Montevideo, Uruguay; MARIO FELIPE ALVAREZ BALARO, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; JOANNA MARIA GONÇALVES SOUZA-FABJAN, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; ISABEL OLIVEIRA COSENTINO, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; VIVIANE LOPES BRAIR, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; CLARA VIEIRA DE SOUZA, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; PEDRO HENRIQUE NICOLAU PINTO, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; ANA LUIZA CUNHA BADE, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil; JEFERSON FERREIRA DA FONSECA, CNPC; FELIPE ZANDONADI BRANDÃO, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil. |
|
Título: |
Transcervical vs. laparotomy embryo collection in ewes: The effectiveness and welfare implications of each technique. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Theriogenology, v. 153, p. 112-121, Sept. 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.05.004 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: This study assessed animal welfare in ewes subjected to transcervical (TC) or laparotomy (LP) embryo collection, and the efficiency of these two techniques. Santa Inês ewes (n = 57) received a protocol for estrus synchronization and superovulation. Cervical dilation protocol was initiated 12 h before embryo collection in all ewes. Depending on the success of cervical passage, the embryos were collected from ewes by either TC or LP. Records were made of physiological (rectal temperature (RT) and heart rate (HR)), endocrine (cortisol concentration), biochemical (glycaemia, total proteins, globulin and albumin concentrations), and behavioral variables. Data were recorded before fasting (BF) and sedation (BS), during (DC) and immediately after embryo collection (IAC), and 1 h (1hAC), 3 h (3hAC), 6 h (6hAC), 12 h (12hAC), 24 h (24hAC), and 48 h (48hAC) after embryo collection. The LP and TC procedures were applied to 22 and 35 ewes (with 100.0% and 94.3% of procedures being successful, respectively). The use of LP took longer than TC (P = 0.007) but was less effective in the recovery of uterine fluid and structures (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0180, respectively), with no difference in the number of viable embryos recovered per animal. The TC procedure induced a greater RT at DC (P = 0.002) and IAC moments (P < 0.0001). The heart rate was greater in TC than LP in IAC (P = 0.036). On the other hand, HR was greater with LP at 12hAC (P = 0.033) and 24hAC (P = 0.002). There was no interaction between the procedures and time on total proteins, albumin, or globulin concentrations. The TC procedure induced greater glycaemia than LP in IAC (P < 0.0001). LP induced greater serum cortisol concentration than TC at DC, IAC, 1hAC (P = 0.0004; P = 0.0006; P = 0.036, respectively), even though it was greater in the TC than the LP procedure at 3hAC (P = 0.008). In conclusion, the TC embryo collection was more effective than the traditional LP procedure. Although both embryo collection procedures affected ewes? welfare, the TC procedure is probably less stressor than the LP. MenosAbstract: This study assessed animal welfare in ewes subjected to transcervical (TC) or laparotomy (LP) embryo collection, and the efficiency of these two techniques. Santa Inês ewes (n = 57) received a protocol for estrus synchronization and superovulation. Cervical dilation protocol was initiated 12 h before embryo collection in all ewes. Depending on the success of cervical passage, the embryos were collected from ewes by either TC or LP. Records were made of physiological (rectal temperature (RT) and heart rate (HR)), endocrine (cortisol concentration), biochemical (glycaemia, total proteins, globulin and albumin concentrations), and behavioral variables. Data were recorded before fasting (BF) and sedation (BS), during (DC) and immediately after embryo collection (IAC), and 1 h (1hAC), 3 h (3hAC), 6 h (6hAC), 12 h (12hAC), 24 h (24hAC), and 48 h (48hAC) after embryo collection. The LP and TC procedures were applied to 22 and 35 ewes (with 100.0% and 94.3% of procedures being successful, respectively). The use of LP took longer than TC (P = 0.007) but was less effective in the recovery of uterine fluid and structures (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0180, respectively), with no difference in the number of viable embryos recovered per animal. The TC procedure induced a greater RT at DC (P = 0.002) and IAC moments (P < 0.0001). The heart rate was greater in TC than LP in IAC (P = 0.036). On the other hand, HR was greater with LP at 12hAC (P = 0.033) and 24hAC (P = 0.002). There was no... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Animal behaviour; Animal biotechnology; Embryo recovery; Reproductive biotechnologies. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bem-Estar; Biotecnologia; Comportamento Animal; Ovelha; Ovino; Stress. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Animal behavior; Animal stress; Ewes; Sheep; Small ruminants. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03355naa a2200433 a 4500
001 2122504
005 2020-05-22
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.05.004$2DOI
100 1 $aSANTOS, J. D. R.
245 $aTranscervical vs. laparotomy embryo collection in ewes$bThe effectiveness and welfare implications of each technique.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aAbstract: This study assessed animal welfare in ewes subjected to transcervical (TC) or laparotomy (LP) embryo collection, and the efficiency of these two techniques. Santa Inês ewes (n = 57) received a protocol for estrus synchronization and superovulation. Cervical dilation protocol was initiated 12 h before embryo collection in all ewes. Depending on the success of cervical passage, the embryos were collected from ewes by either TC or LP. Records were made of physiological (rectal temperature (RT) and heart rate (HR)), endocrine (cortisol concentration), biochemical (glycaemia, total proteins, globulin and albumin concentrations), and behavioral variables. Data were recorded before fasting (BF) and sedation (BS), during (DC) and immediately after embryo collection (IAC), and 1 h (1hAC), 3 h (3hAC), 6 h (6hAC), 12 h (12hAC), 24 h (24hAC), and 48 h (48hAC) after embryo collection. The LP and TC procedures were applied to 22 and 35 ewes (with 100.0% and 94.3% of procedures being successful, respectively). The use of LP took longer than TC (P = 0.007) but was less effective in the recovery of uterine fluid and structures (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0180, respectively), with no difference in the number of viable embryos recovered per animal. The TC procedure induced a greater RT at DC (P = 0.002) and IAC moments (P < 0.0001). The heart rate was greater in TC than LP in IAC (P = 0.036). On the other hand, HR was greater with LP at 12hAC (P = 0.033) and 24hAC (P = 0.002). There was no interaction between the procedures and time on total proteins, albumin, or globulin concentrations. The TC procedure induced greater glycaemia than LP in IAC (P < 0.0001). LP induced greater serum cortisol concentration than TC at DC, IAC, 1hAC (P = 0.0004; P = 0.0006; P = 0.036, respectively), even though it was greater in the TC than the LP procedure at 3hAC (P = 0.008). In conclusion, the TC embryo collection was more effective than the traditional LP procedure. Although both embryo collection procedures affected ewes? welfare, the TC procedure is probably less stressor than the LP.
650 $aAnimal behavior
650 $aAnimal stress
650 $aEwes
650 $aSheep
650 $aSmall ruminants
650 $aBem-Estar
650 $aBiotecnologia
650 $aComportamento Animal
650 $aOvelha
650 $aOvino
650 $aStress
653 $aAnimal behaviour
653 $aAnimal biotechnology
653 $aEmbryo recovery
653 $aReproductive biotechnologies
700 1 $aUNGERFELD, R.
700 1 $aBALARO, M. F. A.
700 1 $aSOUZA-FABJAN, J. M. G.
700 1 $aCOSENTINO, I. O.
700 1 $aBRAIR, V. L.
700 1 $aSOUZA, C. V. de
700 1 $aPINTO, P. H. N.
700 1 $aBADE, A. L. C.
700 1 $aFONSECA, J. F. da
700 1 $aBRANDÃO, F. Z.
773 $tTheriogenology$gv. 153, p. 112-121, Sept. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/05/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/05/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
GEBLER, L.; DÍAZ, A.; MAIA, L.; MEDINA, L.; TRELLES, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUCIANO GEBLER, CNPUV; ALEJANDRA DÍAZ, Inter‑American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture - IICA, San José, Costa Rica; LUCIA MAIA, Inter‑American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture - IICA, Brasilia - DF, Brazil; LOURDES MEDINA, Inter‑American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture - IICA, Tegucigalpa, Honduras; SACHA TRELLES, Inter‑American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture - IICA, San José, Costa Rica. |
|
Título: |
4DGAP: New tool for multidimensional impact assessment and guide to certification programs for Good Agricultural and Environmental Practices. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS), v. 8, n. 5, p. 174-182, May 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.85.20 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Food markets are increasingly demanding the implementation of good agricultural practices programs (GAP) in the public or private sectors as a way to guarantee the sustainable and responsible production of safe food. Due to the large number of GAP programs being implemented, producers are often required to participate in several of them to comply with the demands coming from diverse buyers in different target markets; as a result, even though the majority of certificate requirements share factors in common, the costs of implementation and evaluation increase. In this context, a tool was created to analyze and manage multidimensional risks in agriculture (4DGAP tool) (evaluation of the GAP in four dimensions), developed through an alliance between Embrapa and IICA proposing methodological bases that would support the preparation and updating of indicators linked to the GAP programs, facilitate interplay between the different certification programs and likewise between programs and the producers, agribusinesses and governmental agencies that use them. In addition, its objective is to contribute to the reorganization of all kinds of rural farms, based on a concept of property planning in keeping with the technical and environmental parameters needed to comply with the principles of sustainable development. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Certification of agricultural quality; Environmental planning; Sustainability. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Food security. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/223255/1/20IJAERS-05202119-4DGAP.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02141naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2131837
005 2021-05-17
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.85.20$2DOI
100 1 $aGEBLER, L.
245 $a4DGAP$bNew tool for multidimensional impact assessment and guide to certification programs for Good Agricultural and Environmental Practices.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aFood markets are increasingly demanding the implementation of good agricultural practices programs (GAP) in the public or private sectors as a way to guarantee the sustainable and responsible production of safe food. Due to the large number of GAP programs being implemented, producers are often required to participate in several of them to comply with the demands coming from diverse buyers in different target markets; as a result, even though the majority of certificate requirements share factors in common, the costs of implementation and evaluation increase. In this context, a tool was created to analyze and manage multidimensional risks in agriculture (4DGAP tool) (evaluation of the GAP in four dimensions), developed through an alliance between Embrapa and IICA proposing methodological bases that would support the preparation and updating of indicators linked to the GAP programs, facilitate interplay between the different certification programs and likewise between programs and the producers, agribusinesses and governmental agencies that use them. In addition, its objective is to contribute to the reorganization of all kinds of rural farms, based on a concept of property planning in keeping with the technical and environmental parameters needed to comply with the principles of sustainable development.
650 $aFood security
653 $aCertification of agricultural quality
653 $aEnvironmental planning
653 $aSustainability
700 1 $aDÍAZ, A.
700 1 $aMAIA, L.
700 1 $aMEDINA, L.
700 1 $aTRELLES, S.
773 $tInternational Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS)$gv. 8, n. 5, p. 174-182, May 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
