|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Norte / UEP-Parnaíba. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/12/1993 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/12/1993 |
|
Autoria: |
YOUNG, D. L.; WALKER, D. J.; KANJO, P. L. |
|
Título: |
Cost effectiveness and equity aspects of soil conservation programs ina highly erodible region. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1991 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, v.73, n.4, p.1053-1062, 1991. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The conservation reserve (CRP) and conservation compliance programs could divide the soil conservation burden between farmers and taxpayers.In a highly erodiblesoutheastern Washington region, however, a uniformregion-wide CRP bid cap and relaxed compliance requirements resulted in little or no projected burden for farmers in arid, less productive subregions. In contrast, farmers in a more productive subregion were projected to bear 50% or more of the costs f soil conservation. The projected government cost per ton of soil conserved also increased threefold from the most to the least productive subregion. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Conservation; Custos de distribuicao; Custos efetivos; Distribution costs; Effective costs. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação; Solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
soil. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01300naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1074022
005 1993-12-15
008 1991 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aYOUNG, D. L.
245 $aCost effectiveness and equity aspects of soil conservation programs ina highly erodible region.
260 $c1991
520 $aThe conservation reserve (CRP) and conservation compliance programs could divide the soil conservation burden between farmers and taxpayers.In a highly erodiblesoutheastern Washington region, however, a uniformregion-wide CRP bid cap and relaxed compliance requirements resulted in little or no projected burden for farmers in arid, less productive subregions. In contrast, farmers in a more productive subregion were projected to bear 50% or more of the costs f soil conservation. The projected government cost per ton of soil conserved also increased threefold from the most to the least productive subregion.
650 $asoil
650 $aConservação
650 $aSolo
653 $aConservation
653 $aCustos de distribuicao
653 $aCustos efetivos
653 $aDistribution costs
653 $aEffective costs
700 1 $aWALKER, D. J.
700 1 $aKANJO, P. L.
773 $tAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics$gv.73, n.4, p.1053-1062, 1991.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Norte / UEP-Parnaíba (CPAMN-UEPP) |
|
