01300naa a2200241 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001910000170006024501000007726000090017752006160018665000090080265000180081165000090082965300170083865300270085565300200088265300230090265300200092570000180094570000170096377300780098010740221993-12-15       1991    bl ---       0--  u    #d1 aYOUNG, D. L.  aCost effectiveness and equity aspects of soil conservation programs ina highly erodible region.  c1991  aThe conservation reserve (CRP) and conservation compliance programs could divide the soil conservation burden between farmers and taxpayers.In a highly erodiblesoutheastern Washington region, however, a uniformregion-wide CRP bid cap and relaxed compliance requirements resulted in little or no projected burden for farmers in arid, less productive subregions. In contrast, farmers in a more productive subregion were projected to bear 50% or more of the costs f soil conservation. The projected government cost per ton of soil conserved also increased threefold from the most to the least productive subregion.  asoil  aConservação  aSolo  aConservation  aCustos de distribuicao  aCustos efetivos  aDistribution costs  aEffective costs1 aWALKER, D. J.1 aKANJO, P. L.  tAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economicsgv.73, n.4, p.1053-1062, 1991.