| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Norte / UEP-Parnaíba; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/10/2004 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/06/2011 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Documentos |
|
Autoria: |
CAMARGO, R. C. R. de; RÊGO, J. G. de S.; LOPES, M. T. do R.; PEREIRA, F. de M.; MELO, A. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
RICARDO COSTA RODRIGUES DE CAMARGO, CPAMN; JOSETH GLÁUCIA DE SIQUEIRA RÊGO, Bolsista CNPq; MARIA TERESA DO REGO LOPES, CPAMN; FÁBIA DE MELLO PEREIRA, CPAMN; ADRIANA LAGO MELO, ENGENHEIRA AGRÔNOMA. |
|
Título: |
Boas práticas na colheita, extração e beneficiamento do mel. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2003 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Teresina: Embrapa Meio-Norte, 2003. |
|
Páginas: |
28 p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Meio-Norte. Documentos, 78). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Fatores climáticos; Vestimentas; Prática de colheita; Selecão dos quadros; Uso da fumaça; Cuidados com o veículo e o transporte; Unidade de extração e beneficiamento do mel; Localizaçã o; Instalações; Areas; Recepção; Area de manipulação do mel; Expedição; Banheiros/vestiários; Equipamentos e utensílios; Higiene das instalações, equipamentos e utensílios; Vestimentas Pessoal; Fluxograma; Recebimento das melgueiras; Seleção e limpeza prévia; Desoperculação; Centrifugação; Filtração; Decantação; Envase; Armazenamento. |
|
Thesagro: |
Beneficiamento; Colheita; Mel; Processamento. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/35876/1/Doc78.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01175nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1066838
005 2011-06-09
008 2003 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aCAMARGO, R. C. R. de
245 $aBoas práticas na colheita, extração e beneficiamento do mel.
260 $aTeresina: Embrapa Meio-Norte$c2003
300 $a28 p.
490 $a(Embrapa Meio-Norte. Documentos, 78).
520 $aFatores climáticos; Vestimentas; Prática de colheita; Selecão dos quadros; Uso da fumaça; Cuidados com o veículo e o transporte; Unidade de extração e beneficiamento do mel; Localizaçã o; Instalações; Areas; Recepção; Area de manipulação do mel; Expedição; Banheiros/vestiários; Equipamentos e utensílios; Higiene das instalações, equipamentos e utensílios; Vestimentas Pessoal; Fluxograma; Recebimento das melgueiras; Seleção e limpeza prévia; Desoperculação; Centrifugação; Filtração; Decantação; Envase; Armazenamento.
650 $aBeneficiamento
650 $aColheita
650 $aMel
650 $aProcessamento
700 1 $aRÊGO, J. G. de S.
700 1 $aLOPES, M. T. do R.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, F. de M.
700 1 $aMELO, A. L.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio-Norte (CPAMN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/04/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/04/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
ARGENTA, L. C.; ANESE, R. de O.; THEWES, F. R.; VIEIRA, M. J.; ALVARENGA, T. H. de P.; FREITAS, S. T. de; ARGENTA, L. H. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUIZ CARLOS ARGENTA, EMPRESA CATARINENSE DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA E EXTENSÃO RURAL; ROGERIO DE OLIVEIRA ANESE, INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; FABIO RODRIGO THEWES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA; MARCELO JOSÉ VIEIRA, FISCHER S/A AGROINDÚSTRIA; TIAGO HENRIQUE DE PAULA ALVARENGA, INSTITUTO FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA; SERGIO TONETTO DE FREITAS, CPATSA; LUIZA HELENA MACHADO ARGENTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ. |
|
Título: |
Economic analysis of the harvest date effects on quality and productivity of Fuji Suprema apples. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2024 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, v. 46, e-064, 2024. |
|
DOI: |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452024064 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed to analyze the effect of harvest date on ‘Fuji Suprema’ apple quality, productivity, and economic profitability at harvest and after storage. Apples were harvested at the beginning of the commercial harvest window (H1), ten days after H1 (H2), and 22 days after H1 (H3) in the 2008 and 2009 growing seasons. A total of six samples with ~400 kg of fruit (~2,900 apples) each were picked at each growing season and harvest date, which were assessed at harvest (six subsamples of 100 fruit) and after 250 days of controlled atmosphere storage at 0.8 °C. The economic analysis considered fixed and variable production costs in the orchard and postharvest practices and the productivity of packaged apples (pack-out). Early harvested (H1) apples had greater flesh firmness, acidity, and lower soluble solids content than late-harvested apples (H3), both at harvest and after storage. Delaying harvest by 22 days increased the production by 10.2% due to increased fruit size but reduced the production by 3.6% due to severe sunburn and pre-harvest decay incidence. Late harvest also increased production losses due to decay by 4.4% and 10.9% during storage and shelf, respectively, but reduced production losses due to superficial scald by 17.1 to 22.7%. The net revenue (R$ ha-1) is higher for apples harvested late (H3, flesh firmness of 15.6 lb and starch index of 7.1) than for apples harvested early (H1 and H2) when the fruit is marketed soon after harvest (between April and May). However, for apples marketed after long-term storage, economic profitability is maximum when harvested at an intermediate maturity stage (H2, flesh firmness of 16.4 lb and starch index of 6). MenosThis study aimed to analyze the effect of harvest date on ‘Fuji Suprema’ apple quality, productivity, and economic profitability at harvest and after storage. Apples were harvested at the beginning of the commercial harvest window (H1), ten days after H1 (H2), and 22 days after H1 (H3) in the 2008 and 2009 growing seasons. A total of six samples with ~400 kg of fruit (~2,900 apples) each were picked at each growing season and harvest date, which were assessed at harvest (six subsamples of 100 fruit) and after 250 days of controlled atmosphere storage at 0.8 °C. The economic analysis considered fixed and variable production costs in the orchard and postharvest practices and the productivity of packaged apples (pack-out). Early harvested (H1) apples had greater flesh firmness, acidity, and lower soluble solids content than late-harvested apples (H3), both at harvest and after storage. Delaying harvest by 22 days increased the production by 10.2% due to increased fruit size but reduced the production by 3.6% due to severe sunburn and pre-harvest decay incidence. Late harvest also increased production losses due to decay by 4.4% and 10.9% during storage and shelf, respectively, but reduced production losses due to superficial scald by 17.1 to 22.7%. The net revenue (R$ ha-1) is higher for apples harvested late (H3, flesh firmness of 15.6 lb and starch index of 7.1) than for apples harvested early (H1 and H2) when the fruit is marketed soon after harvest (between April and May). ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Variedade Fuji Suprema. |
|
Thesagro: |
Distúrbio Fisiológico; Maçã; Malus Domestica; Pós-Colheita. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Apples; Postharvest physiology; Postharvest technology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1163923/1/Economic-analysis-of-the-harvest-date-effects-on-quality-and-productivity-of-Fuji-Suprema-apples-2024.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02624naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2163923
005 2024-04-29
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452024064$2DOI
100 1 $aARGENTA, L. C.
245 $aEconomic analysis of the harvest date effects on quality and productivity of Fuji Suprema apples.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
520 $aThis study aimed to analyze the effect of harvest date on ‘Fuji Suprema’ apple quality, productivity, and economic profitability at harvest and after storage. Apples were harvested at the beginning of the commercial harvest window (H1), ten days after H1 (H2), and 22 days after H1 (H3) in the 2008 and 2009 growing seasons. A total of six samples with ~400 kg of fruit (~2,900 apples) each were picked at each growing season and harvest date, which were assessed at harvest (six subsamples of 100 fruit) and after 250 days of controlled atmosphere storage at 0.8 °C. The economic analysis considered fixed and variable production costs in the orchard and postharvest practices and the productivity of packaged apples (pack-out). Early harvested (H1) apples had greater flesh firmness, acidity, and lower soluble solids content than late-harvested apples (H3), both at harvest and after storage. Delaying harvest by 22 days increased the production by 10.2% due to increased fruit size but reduced the production by 3.6% due to severe sunburn and pre-harvest decay incidence. Late harvest also increased production losses due to decay by 4.4% and 10.9% during storage and shelf, respectively, but reduced production losses due to superficial scald by 17.1 to 22.7%. The net revenue (R$ ha-1) is higher for apples harvested late (H3, flesh firmness of 15.6 lb and starch index of 7.1) than for apples harvested early (H1 and H2) when the fruit is marketed soon after harvest (between April and May). However, for apples marketed after long-term storage, economic profitability is maximum when harvested at an intermediate maturity stage (H2, flesh firmness of 16.4 lb and starch index of 6).
650 $aApples
650 $aPostharvest physiology
650 $aPostharvest technology
650 $aDistúrbio Fisiológico
650 $aMaçã
650 $aMalus Domestica
650 $aPós-Colheita
653 $aVariedade Fuji Suprema
700 1 $aANESE, R. de O.
700 1 $aTHEWES, F. R.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, M. J.
700 1 $aALVARENGA, T. H. de P.
700 1 $aFREITAS, S. T. de
700 1 $aARGENTA, L. H. M.
773 $tRevista Brasileira de Fruticultura$gv. 46, e-064, 2024.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
