| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
01/12/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/04/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Circular Técnica |
|
Autoria: |
SOUZA, M. D. de; LIGO, M. A. V.; SKORUPA, L. A.; PIRES, A. M. M.; FILIZOLA, H. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
MANOEL DORNELAS DE SOUZA, CNPMA; MARCOS ANTONIO VIEIRA LIGO, CNPMA; LADISLAU ARAUJO SKORUPA, CNPMA; ADRIANA MARLENE MORENO PIRES, CNPMA; HELOISA FERREIRA FILIZOLA, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
Atributos físicos e químicos de área degradada tratada com lodo de esgoto . |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Jaguariúna: Embrapa Meio Ambiente, 2011. |
|
Páginas: |
6 p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Circular Técnica, 21). |
|
ISSN: |
1516-4683 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Resumo: O lodo pode fornecer às plantas, em quantidades satisfatórias, com exceção do potássio, todos os nutrientes essenciais para as culturas. A composição química do lodo é de suma importância na recomendação da quantidade a ser aplicada no solo. As recomendações são normalmente baseadas no teor de nitrogênio levando-se em consideração as concentrações de metais pesados presentes na massa de lodo, além da presença de patógenos. Assim, o conhecimento da taxa de mineralização do N orgânico é um dos principais fatores que determinam a quantidade de lodo a ser aplicada no solo. Apesar das vantagens do uso de lodo de esgoto para recuperar áreas degradadas, como apontado pela avaliação de outras variáveis neste estudo, deve ser salientado o inconveniente deste ser uma fonte altamente geradora de nitrato e, portanto, uma fonte de contaminação de águas superficiais e subsuperficiais. A extensão desses riscos deve, contudo, ser melhor investigada ao longo do tempo. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Área degradada; Código florestal; Lodo de esgoto. |
|
Thesagro: |
Adubo de esgoto; Impacto ambiental; Nitrato; Poluição da água; Recuperação do solo; Solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Environmental impact; Land restoration; Sewage sludge. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/48775/1/circular-21.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01973nam a2200337 a 4500
001 1908169
005 2016-04-04
008 2011 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
022 $a1516-4683
100 1 $aSOUZA, M. D. de
245 $aAtributos físicos e químicos de área degradada tratada com lodo de esgoto .$h[electronic resource]
260 $aJaguariúna: Embrapa Meio Ambiente$c2011
300 $a6 p.
490 $a(Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Circular Técnica, 21).
520 $aResumo: O lodo pode fornecer às plantas, em quantidades satisfatórias, com exceção do potássio, todos os nutrientes essenciais para as culturas. A composição química do lodo é de suma importância na recomendação da quantidade a ser aplicada no solo. As recomendações são normalmente baseadas no teor de nitrogênio levando-se em consideração as concentrações de metais pesados presentes na massa de lodo, além da presença de patógenos. Assim, o conhecimento da taxa de mineralização do N orgânico é um dos principais fatores que determinam a quantidade de lodo a ser aplicada no solo. Apesar das vantagens do uso de lodo de esgoto para recuperar áreas degradadas, como apontado pela avaliação de outras variáveis neste estudo, deve ser salientado o inconveniente deste ser uma fonte altamente geradora de nitrato e, portanto, uma fonte de contaminação de águas superficiais e subsuperficiais. A extensão desses riscos deve, contudo, ser melhor investigada ao longo do tempo.
650 $aEnvironmental impact
650 $aLand restoration
650 $aSewage sludge
650 $aAdubo de esgoto
650 $aImpacto ambiental
650 $aNitrato
650 $aPoluição da água
650 $aRecuperação do solo
650 $aSolo
653 $aÁrea degradada
653 $aCódigo florestal
653 $aLodo de esgoto
700 1 $aLIGO, M. A. V.
700 1 $aSKORUPA, L. A.
700 1 $aPIRES, A. M. M.
700 1 $aFILIZOLA, H. F.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/08/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/08/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
RAIOL-JUNIOR, L. L.; CARVALHO, E. V. de; MOREIRA, A. S.; MARQUES, J. P. R.; STUCHI, E. S.; GIRARDI, E. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
LAUDECIR LEMOS RAIOL-JUNIOR; EVERTON VIEIRA DE CARVALHO; ALECIO SOUZA MOREIRA, CNPMF; JOÃO PAULO RODRIGUES MARQUES, UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO; EDUARDO SANCHES STUCHI, CNPMF; EDUARDO AUGUSTO GIRARDI, CNPMF. |
|
Título: |
Graft compatibility classification within Aurantioideae Based on Biometric Traits and the Anatomy of Graft Union. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agriculture , v.12, n.1, 2022. |
|
ISSN: |
2077-0472 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Citrus relatives are a relevant source of valuable traits for use in citrus breeding, including resistance to diseases such as Huanglongbing (HLB). Resistant rootstocks may impact tree responses to HLB. This requires graft compatibility, which has been poorly investigated within the Aurantioideae. In this study, the biometric characteristics and the anatomy of the graft union of 86 scion/rootstock combinations were assessed. This comprised 18 genotypes/species and 8 genera from Citrinae, Balsamocitrinae, and Clauseninae subtribes sensu Swingle and Reece. Most graft combinations were found to be noncompatible. Phylogenetic proximity did not ensure successful grafting as, for example, Orange jasmine autografts failed, whereas some intergeneric grafts were successful (>60% of graft-take). Plant scion height was directly related to graft-take, but the correlation between the scion and rootstock stem diameters was not a reliable indicator of graft compatibility. Rangpur/Tabog, Tabog/Rangpur, Wampee/Rangpur, Wampee/Pomeroy, Wampee/Swingle, Pomeroy/Wampee, and Swingle/Wampee were the most compatible intergeneric graft combinations. Graft-take success for this was at similar levels to those of sweet orange grafted on common citrus rootstocks. The position as a scion or rootstock in the combination affected the performance and was specific to the genotypes tested. The lack of differentiation between xylem-derived calli and the accumulation of phenolic compounds at the graft union were clear anatomical and biochemical markers, respectively, of incompatibility for most Aurantioideae combinations. In the field, within a set of the ten most promising combinations, Hamlin/Rangpur (control) was the only one that became infected by ?Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus?. This was first observed 12 months after planting. Overall, the assessment of biometric traits and anatomy of the graft union allowed Aurantioideae genotypes to be divided into four clusters, with respect to their graft compatibility, as follows: fully compatible with high graft-take and plant growth; potentially compatible with high graft-take but lower plant growth; partially incompatible with lower graft-take and poor plant growth; and fully incompatible with a complete absence of graft-take. MenosCitrus relatives are a relevant source of valuable traits for use in citrus breeding, including resistance to diseases such as Huanglongbing (HLB). Resistant rootstocks may impact tree responses to HLB. This requires graft compatibility, which has been poorly investigated within the Aurantioideae. In this study, the biometric characteristics and the anatomy of the graft union of 86 scion/rootstock combinations were assessed. This comprised 18 genotypes/species and 8 genera from Citrinae, Balsamocitrinae, and Clauseninae subtribes sensu Swingle and Reece. Most graft combinations were found to be noncompatible. Phylogenetic proximity did not ensure successful grafting as, for example, Orange jasmine autografts failed, whereas some intergeneric grafts were successful (>60% of graft-take). Plant scion height was directly related to graft-take, but the correlation between the scion and rootstock stem diameters was not a reliable indicator of graft compatibility. Rangpur/Tabog, Tabog/Rangpur, Wampee/Rangpur, Wampee/Pomeroy, Wampee/Swingle, Pomeroy/Wampee, and Swingle/Wampee were the most compatible intergeneric graft combinations. Graft-take success for this was at similar levels to those of sweet orange grafted on common citrus rootstocks. The position as a scion or rootstock in the combination affected the performance and was specific to the genotypes tested. The lack of differentiation between xylem-derived calli and the accumulation of phenolic compounds at the graft union wer... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Doença de Planta. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02900naa a2200205 a 4500
001 2145762
005 2022-08-29
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2077-0472
100 1 $aRAIOL-JUNIOR, L. L.
245 $aGraft compatibility classification within Aurantioideae Based on Biometric Traits and the Anatomy of Graft Union.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aCitrus relatives are a relevant source of valuable traits for use in citrus breeding, including resistance to diseases such as Huanglongbing (HLB). Resistant rootstocks may impact tree responses to HLB. This requires graft compatibility, which has been poorly investigated within the Aurantioideae. In this study, the biometric characteristics and the anatomy of the graft union of 86 scion/rootstock combinations were assessed. This comprised 18 genotypes/species and 8 genera from Citrinae, Balsamocitrinae, and Clauseninae subtribes sensu Swingle and Reece. Most graft combinations were found to be noncompatible. Phylogenetic proximity did not ensure successful grafting as, for example, Orange jasmine autografts failed, whereas some intergeneric grafts were successful (>60% of graft-take). Plant scion height was directly related to graft-take, but the correlation between the scion and rootstock stem diameters was not a reliable indicator of graft compatibility. Rangpur/Tabog, Tabog/Rangpur, Wampee/Rangpur, Wampee/Pomeroy, Wampee/Swingle, Pomeroy/Wampee, and Swingle/Wampee were the most compatible intergeneric graft combinations. Graft-take success for this was at similar levels to those of sweet orange grafted on common citrus rootstocks. The position as a scion or rootstock in the combination affected the performance and was specific to the genotypes tested. The lack of differentiation between xylem-derived calli and the accumulation of phenolic compounds at the graft union were clear anatomical and biochemical markers, respectively, of incompatibility for most Aurantioideae combinations. In the field, within a set of the ten most promising combinations, Hamlin/Rangpur (control) was the only one that became infected by ?Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus?. This was first observed 12 months after planting. Overall, the assessment of biometric traits and anatomy of the graft union allowed Aurantioideae genotypes to be divided into four clusters, with respect to their graft compatibility, as follows: fully compatible with high graft-take and plant growth; potentially compatible with high graft-take but lower plant growth; partially incompatible with lower graft-take and poor plant growth; and fully incompatible with a complete absence of graft-take.
650 $aDoença de Planta
700 1 $aCARVALHO, E. V. de
700 1 $aMOREIRA, A. S.
700 1 $aMARQUES, J. P. R.
700 1 $aSTUCHI, E. S.
700 1 $aGIRARDI, E. A.
773 $tAgriculture$gv.12, n.1, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
