| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
RESQUE, A. G. L.; COUDEL, E.; PIKETTY, M.-G.; CIALDELLA, N.; SA, T. D. de A.; PIRAUX, M.; ASSIS, W.; LE PAGE, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
Antonio Gabriel L. Resque, UFRA; Emilie Coudel, CIRAD/UNB; Marie-Gabrielle Piketty, CIRAD / Pontifica Universidad Javeriana; Nathalie Cialdella, CIRAD / CPATU; TATIANA DEANE DE ABREU SA, CPATU; Marc Piraux, CIRAD / CPATU; William Assis, UFPA; Christophe Le Page, CIRAD. |
|
Título: |
Agrobiodiversity and public food procurement programs in Brazil: influence of local stakeholders in configuring green mediated markets. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Sustainability, v. 11, n. 5, 1425, 2019. |
|
DOI: |
10.3390/su11051425 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The last few years have seen the emergence of different initiatives designed to promote the biodiversification of agroecosystems as a counterpoint to the global expansion of homogenized industrial agriculture. In Brazil, two food procurement programs demonstrate the potential to promote discussions related to this agroecological transition: the National School Meal Program (Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar, PNAE) and the Food Procurement Program (Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos, PAA). The objectives of this paper are to analyze: (a) how these procurement programs currently integrate agrobiodiversity (crops and cropping systems) according to the local context; (b) the main challenges that key stakeholders perceive for the adoption of biodiverse systems; and (c) the extent to which the key stakeholders involved in these programs associate agrobiodiversity with the provision of ecosystem services. We carried out this research in 2017 in two contrasting municipalities in the eastern part of the Brazilian Amazon, Paragominas and Irituia. Our research shows that these programs have included up to 42 species in Irituia and 32 species in Paragominas. Perennial crop species are the most common type of culture in Irituia (up to 50%), while vegetables are the most common in Paragominas (up to 47%). Although in both municipalities stakeholders identify a large number of ecosystem services (up to 17), services mentioned in Irituia were more closely related to agrobiodiversity. Stakeholders indirectly associated with the programs have a broader view of ecosystem services. We conclude that these procurement programs can be useful tools to promote the biodiversification of local production systems, but their potential may depend on involving institutions not directly associated with their administration. Additionally, despite the observed differences in production context, providing more ecosystem services appears to be a compelling motivation for promoting changes in agroecosystems. MenosThe last few years have seen the emergence of different initiatives designed to promote the biodiversification of agroecosystems as a counterpoint to the global expansion of homogenized industrial agriculture. In Brazil, two food procurement programs demonstrate the potential to promote discussions related to this agroecological transition: the National School Meal Program (Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar, PNAE) and the Food Procurement Program (Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos, PAA). The objectives of this paper are to analyze: (a) how these procurement programs currently integrate agrobiodiversity (crops and cropping systems) according to the local context; (b) the main challenges that key stakeholders perceive for the adoption of biodiverse systems; and (c) the extent to which the key stakeholders involved in these programs associate agrobiodiversity with the provision of ecosystem services. We carried out this research in 2017 in two contrasting municipalities in the eastern part of the Brazilian Amazon, Paragominas and Irituia. Our research shows that these programs have included up to 42 species in Irituia and 32 species in Paragominas. Perennial crop species are the most common type of culture in Irituia (up to 50%), while vegetables are the most common in Paragominas (up to 47%). Although in both municipalities stakeholders identify a large number of ecosystem services (up to 17), services mentioned in Irituia were more closely related to agrobiodiversity.... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agrobiodiversidade; Serviços de ecossistemas; Transição agroecológica. |
|
Thesagro: |
Alimento; Mercado. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Ecosystem services. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1159296/1/Agrobiodiversity-and-Public.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02887naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2159296
005 2023-12-07
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3390/su11051425$2DOI
100 1 $aRESQUE, A. G. L.
245 $aAgrobiodiversity and public food procurement programs in Brazil$binfluence of local stakeholders in configuring green mediated markets.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aThe last few years have seen the emergence of different initiatives designed to promote the biodiversification of agroecosystems as a counterpoint to the global expansion of homogenized industrial agriculture. In Brazil, two food procurement programs demonstrate the potential to promote discussions related to this agroecological transition: the National School Meal Program (Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar, PNAE) and the Food Procurement Program (Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos, PAA). The objectives of this paper are to analyze: (a) how these procurement programs currently integrate agrobiodiversity (crops and cropping systems) according to the local context; (b) the main challenges that key stakeholders perceive for the adoption of biodiverse systems; and (c) the extent to which the key stakeholders involved in these programs associate agrobiodiversity with the provision of ecosystem services. We carried out this research in 2017 in two contrasting municipalities in the eastern part of the Brazilian Amazon, Paragominas and Irituia. Our research shows that these programs have included up to 42 species in Irituia and 32 species in Paragominas. Perennial crop species are the most common type of culture in Irituia (up to 50%), while vegetables are the most common in Paragominas (up to 47%). Although in both municipalities stakeholders identify a large number of ecosystem services (up to 17), services mentioned in Irituia were more closely related to agrobiodiversity. Stakeholders indirectly associated with the programs have a broader view of ecosystem services. We conclude that these procurement programs can be useful tools to promote the biodiversification of local production systems, but their potential may depend on involving institutions not directly associated with their administration. Additionally, despite the observed differences in production context, providing more ecosystem services appears to be a compelling motivation for promoting changes in agroecosystems.
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aAlimento
650 $aMercado
653 $aAgrobiodiversidade
653 $aServiços de ecossistemas
653 $aTransição agroecológica
700 1 $aCOUDEL, E.
700 1 $aPIKETTY, M.-G.
700 1 $aCIALDELLA, N.
700 1 $aSA, T. D. de A.
700 1 $aPIRAUX, M.
700 1 $aASSIS, W.
700 1 $aLE PAGE, C.
773 $tSustainability$gv. 11, n. 5, 1425, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/10/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/10/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
NUNES, C. A.; BERENGUER, E.; FRANÇA, F.; FERREIRA, J. N.; LEES, A. C.; LOUZADA, J.; SAYER, E. J.; SOLAR, R.; SMITH, C. C.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; BRAGA, D. de L.; CAMARGO, P. B. de; CERRI, C. E. P.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de; DURIGAN, M.; MOURA, N.; OLIVEIRA, V. H. F.; RIBAS, C.; VAZ-DE-MELLO, F.; VIEIRA, I.; ZANETTI, R.; BARLOW, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
CÁSSIO ALENCAR NUNES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; ERIKA BERENGUER, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; FILIPE FRANÇA, UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; ALEXANDER C. LEES, MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY; JULIO LOUZADA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; EMMA J. SAYER, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; RICARDO SOLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; CHARLOTTE C. SMITH, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; LUIZ E. O. C. ARAGÃO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; DANIELLE DE LIMA BRAGA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; PLINIO BARBOSA DE CAMARGO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; CARLOS EDUARDO PELLEGRINO CERRI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RAIMUNDO COSME DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPATU; MARIANA DURIGAN, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; NÁRGILA MOURA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; VICTOR HUGO FONSECA OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; CARLA RIBAS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; FERNANDO VAZ-DE-MELLO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MATO GROSSO; IMA VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; RONALD ZANETTI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; JOS BARLOW, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS. |
|
Título: |
Linking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
PNAS, v. 119, n. 27, e2202310119, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220231011 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Human activities pose a major threat to tropical forest biodiversity and ecosystem serv-ices. Although the impacts of deforestation are well studied, multiple land-use andland-cover transitions (LULCTs) occur in tropical landscapes, and we do not knowhow LULCTs differ in their rates or impacts on key ecosystem components. Here, wequantified the impacts of 18 LULCTs on three ecosystem components (biodiversity,carbon, and soil), based on 18 variables collected from 310 sites in the BrazilianAmazon. Across all LULCTs, biodiversity was the most affected ecosystem component,followed by carbon stocks, but the magnitude of change differed widely amongLULCTs and individual variables. Forest clearance for pasture was the most prevalentand high-impact transition, but we also identified other LULCTs with high impact butlower prevalence (e.g., forest to agriculture). Our study demonstrates the importanceof considering multiple ecosystem components and LULCTs to understand the conse-quences of human activities in tropical landscapes |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Carbono; Degradação Ambiental; Desmatamento; Exploração Florestal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biodiversity; Carbon; Deforestation; Degradation; Logging. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1147169/1/pnas.2202310119.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02398naa a2200505 a 4500
001 2147169
005 2022-10-06
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220231011$2DOI
100 1 $aNUNES, C. A.
245 $aLinking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aHuman activities pose a major threat to tropical forest biodiversity and ecosystem serv-ices. Although the impacts of deforestation are well studied, multiple land-use andland-cover transitions (LULCTs) occur in tropical landscapes, and we do not knowhow LULCTs differ in their rates or impacts on key ecosystem components. Here, wequantified the impacts of 18 LULCTs on three ecosystem components (biodiversity,carbon, and soil), based on 18 variables collected from 310 sites in the BrazilianAmazon. Across all LULCTs, biodiversity was the most affected ecosystem component,followed by carbon stocks, but the magnitude of change differed widely amongLULCTs and individual variables. Forest clearance for pasture was the most prevalentand high-impact transition, but we also identified other LULCTs with high impact butlower prevalence (e.g., forest to agriculture). Our study demonstrates the importanceof considering multiple ecosystem components and LULCTs to understand the conse-quences of human activities in tropical landscapes
650 $aBiodiversity
650 $aCarbon
650 $aDeforestation
650 $aDegradation
650 $aLogging
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aCarbono
650 $aDegradação Ambiental
650 $aDesmatamento
650 $aExploração Florestal
700 1 $aBERENGUER, E.
700 1 $aFRANÇA, F.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N.
700 1 $aLEES, A. C.
700 1 $aLOUZADA, J.
700 1 $aSAYER, E. J.
700 1 $aSOLAR, R.
700 1 $aSMITH, C. C.
700 1 $aARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.
700 1 $aBRAGA, D. de L.
700 1 $aCAMARGO, P. B. de
700 1 $aCERRI, C. E. P.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de
700 1 $aDURIGAN, M.
700 1 $aMOURA, N.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, V. H. F.
700 1 $aRIBAS, C.
700 1 $aVAZ-DE-MELLO, F.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I.
700 1 $aZANETTI, R.
700 1 $aBARLOW, J.
773 $tPNAS$gv. 119, n. 27, e2202310119, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
