01644naa a2200301 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001910000180006024501600007826000090023852007320024765000240097965000230100365000170102665000270104365000210107065000200109165000200111165000130113165000260114465000180117065000150118865000210120365000250122470000180124970000220126777300530128915202422025-07-02       1969    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d1 aMONSON, W. G.  aIn vivo nylon bag vs. Two-stage in vitro digestionbcomparison of two techniques for estimating dry-matter digestibility of forages.h[electronic resource]  c1969  aAbstract: In vivo nylon bag and two-stage in vitro, digestion techniques were used to estimate dry-matter digestibility of 159 forage samples involving Coastal hermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.), Pensacola bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides (Burm.) Stapf and C.E. Hubb.), blue lupine (Lupinus angustifolius L.), Desmodium uncinatum, and Dolichos lablab L. A highly significant correlation (r = .81, P &lt .01) was obtained between the two methods with all forages. The stem component of the pearl millet sampies gave the lowest correlation between methods. Either method, when properly used, can be of valuable assistance in evaluating the quality of large numbers of forage samples.  aDesmodium uncinatum  aDry matter content  aForage crops  aIn vitro digestibility  aCynodon Dactylon  aDigestibilidade  aDolichos Lablab  aForragem  aLupinus Angustifolius  aMatéria Seca  aNutrição  aPaspalum Notatum  aPennisetum Typhoides1 aLOWREY, R. S.1 aFORBES JUNIOR, I.  tAgronomy Journalgv. 61, n. 4, p. 587-589, 1969.