02742naa a2200253 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400540006010000200011424500940013426000090022852020020023765000120223965000190225165300210227065300170229165300290230865300210233765300160235870000170237470000200239170000170241177300600242821629842024-03-19 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d7 ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.1036052DOI1 aBARTZ, M. L. C. aEarthworms as soil health indicators in no-tillage agroecosystems.h[electronic resource] c2024 aNo-tillage (NT) and no-tillage systems (NTS) are widely used conservation agriculture practices in Brazil, and in the state of Paran´a, nearly 80% of annual crops are cultivated using these methods. Compared with NT, NTS sites permanently include: minimum soil disturbance, soil cover (straw and living vegetation) and crop rotation and diversification with cover crops. These practices often increase earthworm populations, that can be used to indicate soil health. Herein, we review soil health classification of NT sites, and the species found in Paran´a state. We compiled information from 130 sites with NT or NTS, located in 29 counties, of which 93 had biomass and 91 had species richness data, aiming to compare NT with NTS sites, and the effect of the age of these practices on earthworm populations. Overall, 29 earthworm species were recorded, of which 17 were native, including many new to science. Mean abundance and biomass in NT + NTS were 104 ind m 2 and 2.5 g m 2, respectively, and richness 2.5 species per site. Abundance was significantly higher in NT than NTS in the initial phase of adoption, and both abundance and biomass decreased with increasing age of NT. Earthworm abundance and species richness were positively correlated with clayey soils and phosphorus content, while higher biomass was asso- ciated with soil carbon content and pH. A new classification system was proposed, with the categories poor (<50 ind. m 2, 1 species), moderate (≥50 to <100 ind m 2, 2 species), good (≥100 to <150 ind m 2, 3 species), very good (≥150 to 200 ind m 2, 4 species) and excellent (≥200 ind m 2, ≥5 species) soil health, using earthworm abundance and species richness, respectively. Most of the sites sampled showed poor or moderate soil health, with few displaying very good or excellent health, indicating the need for improved management practices, in order to promote earthworm populations and their potential benefits to soil fertility and plant production. aMinhoca aPlantio Direto aAgroecossistemas aBioindicator aConservation agriculture aCrassiclitellata aSoil health1 aDUDAS, R. T.1 aDEMETRIO, W. C.1 aBROWN, G. G. tEuropean Journal of Soil Biologygv. 121, 103605, 2024.