01663naa a2200265 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400520006010000180011224501650013026000090029552007760030465000180108065300330109865300270113170000230115870000200118170000250120170000220122670000170124870000180126570000200128370000170130377300770132021484312023-03-10       2022    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d7 ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-01034-02DOI1 aFAVERO, V. O.  aCross-Inoculation of elite commercial Bradyrhizobium strains from cowpea and soybean in mung bean and comparison with mung bean isolates.h[electronic resource]  c2022  aThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of nodulation and N2 fixation of strains Bradyrhizobium recommended for cowpea and soybean when used as inoculants for mung bean in comparison with Bradyrhizobium isolates obtained from mung bean nodules. Although mung bean is considered a promiscuous legume, these results suggest the existence of symbiotic incompatibility with some Bradyrhizobium strains. The efficiency of the elite SEMIA 587 (B. elkanii) and UFLA 3?84 (B. viridifuturi) strains in terms of increased nodulation and plant growth was similar to those of Bradyrhizobium strains isolated from mung bean nodules and, therefore, should be evaluated under field conditions to verify their contribution to biological nitrogen fixation in mung bean.  aVigna radiata  aBiological nitrogen fixation  aBradyrhizobium strains1 aCARVALHO, R. H. de1 aLEITE, A. B. C.1 aSANTOS, D. M. T. dos1 aFREITAS, K. M. de1 aZILLI, J. E.1 aXAVIER, G. R.1 aRUMJANEK, N. G.1 aURQUIAGA, S.  tJournal of Soil Science and Plant Nutritiongv. 22, p. 4356-43642, 2022.