01688naa a2200349 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400510006010000190011124501510013026000090028152006610029065000150095165000110096665000160097765300210099365300130101465300180102765300150104565300130106065300220107365300240109570000200111970000170113970000260115670000190118270000190120170000260122070000200124670000200126677300520128621334572021-08-11       2020    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d7 ahttps://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.1029542DOI1 aHELAYEL, M. A.  aComparação analítica entre resultados da glicemia em bovinos obtidos com glicosímetro portátil vs método enzimático.h[electronic resource]  c2020  aChanges in glycemic levels can negatively affect the body. Several techniques for the measurement of blood glucose have been described, but the enzymatic method is considered standard and more accurate in both humans and animals. The College of American Pathologists recommends the use of portable glucometers (PGs), which are routinely used in human medicine because this is an easy, relatively inexpensive method that delivers results quickly. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the measurement of blood glucose in cattle obtained using portable Accu-Check® glucometer with the enzymatic method (EM), which is still considered standard.  aMetabolism  aBovino  aMetabolismo  aEnzymatic method  aGlicemia  aGlicosímetro  aGlucometer  aGlycemia  aLivestock animals  aMétodo enzimático1 aCUNHA, N. C. da1 aMORON, S. E.1 aSILVA, P. C. A. R. da1 aUNHA, I. M. da1 aCHENARD, M. G.1 aCARVALHO, V. de A. N.1 aSOUZA, G. N. de1 aLOPES, S. de P.  tActa Scientiae Veterinariaegv. 48, 1734, 2020.