02699naa a2200445 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400270006010000180008724501570010526000090026252014670027165000130173865000120175165000130176365000190177665000210179565000170181665000140183365000220184765000180186965000090188770000110189670000170190770000220192470000180194670000190196470000180198370000200200170000150202170000170203670000300205370000230208370000170210670000170212370000190214070000170215970000190217677300580219520934652018-07-23 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d7 a10.1111/nph.150562DOI1 aALBERT, L. P. aAge-dependent leaf physiology and consequences for crown-scale carbon uptake during the dry season in an Amazon evergreen forest.h[electronic resource] c2018 aSatellite and tower-based metrics of forest-scale photosynthesis generally increase with dry season progression across central AmazĂ´nia, but the underlying mechanisms lack consensus. We conducted demographic surveys of leaf age composition, and measured the age dependence of leaf physiology in broadleaf canopy trees of abundant species at a central eastern Amazon site. Using a novel leaf-to-branch scaling approach, we used these data to independently test the much-debated hypothesis ? arising from satellite and towe-based observations ? that leaf phenology could explain the forest-scale pattern of dry season photosynthesis. Stomatal conductance and biochemical parameters of photosynthesis were higher for recently mature leaves than for old leaves. Most branches had multiple leaf age categories simultaneously present, and the number of recently mature leaves increased as the dry season progressed because old leaves were exchanged for new leaves. These findings provide the first direct field evidence that branch-scale photosynthetic capacity increases during the dry season, with a magnitude consistent with increases in ecosystem-scale photosynthetic capacity derived from flux towers. Interactions between leaf age-dependent physiology and shifting leaf age-demographic composition are sufficient to explain the dry season photosynthetic capacity pattern at this site, and should be considered in vegetation models of tropical evergreen forests. aAmazonia aDrought aOntogeny aPhotosynthesis aTropical forests aDesmatamento aFenologia aFloresta Tropical aFotossĂ­ntese aSeca1 aWU, J.1 aPROHASKA, N.1 aCAMARGO, P. B. de1 aHUXMAN, T. E.1 aTRIBUZY, E. S.1 aIVANOV, V. Y.1 aOLIVEIRA, R. S.1 aGARCIA, S.1 aSMITH, M. N.1 aOLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de1 aRESTREPO-COUPE, N.1 aSILVA, R. da1 aSTARK, S. C.1 aMARTINS, G. A.1 aPENHA, D. V.1 aSALESKA, S. R. tNew Phytologistgv. 219, n. 3, p. 870-884, Aug. 2018.