02502naa a2200289 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400370006010000180009724501090011526000090022452016550023365300110188865300220189965300290192165300270195065300260197765300240200370000290202770000170205670000250207370000220209870000140212070000140213470000170214877300470216520172572015-06-10       2014    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d7 a10.1534/genetics.114.1713222DOI1 aMUÑOZ, P. R.  aUnraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.h[electronic resource]  c2014  aThe application of quantitative genetics in plant and animal breeding has largely focused on additive models, which may also capture dominance and epistatic effects. Partitioning genetic variance into its additive and nonadditive components using pedigree-based models (P-genomic best linear unbiased predictor) (P-BLUP) is difficult with most commonly available family structures. However, the availability of dense panels of molecular markers makes possible the use of additive- and dominance-realized genomic relationships for the estimation of variance components and the prediction of genetic values (G-BLUP). We evaluated height data from a multifamily population of the tree species Pinus taeda with a systematic series of models accounting for additive, dominance, and first-order epistatic interactions (additive by additive, dominance by dominance, and additive by dominance), using either pedigree- or marker-based information. We show that, compared with the pedigree, use of realized genomic relationships in marker-based models yields a substantially more precise separation of additive and nonadditive components of genetic variance. We conclude that the marker-based relationship matrices in a model including additive and nonadditive effects performed better, improving breeding value prediction. Moreover, our results suggest that, for tree height in this population, the additive and nonadditive components of genetic variance are similar in magnitude. This novel result improves our current understanding of the genetic control and architecture of a quantitative trait and should be considered when developing breeding strategies.  aG-BLUP  aGenomic selection  aMatriz de relacionamento  aMelhoramento genético  aRelationship matrices  aSeleção genômica1 aRESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.1 aGEZAN, S. A.1 aRESENDE, M. D. V. de1 aCAMPOS, G. de los1 aKIRST, M.1 aHUBER, D.1 aPETER, G. F.  tGeneticsgv. 198, p. 1759-1768, Dec. 2014.