| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 3.971 | |
| 1. |  | MOTA, S. dos S.; FARO, I. A. M. de; SOARES, T. L.; ALMEIDA, P. S. de; SOUZA, F. V. D.; AONA, L. Y. S.; COSTA, M. A. P. de C.; ROSSI, M. L.; SOUZA, E. H. de. Pollen morphology and viability of Lymania (Bromeliaceae) species with ornamental potential. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 328, 112890, 2024. 10 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|    |
| 2. | | BROWN, G. G.; DEMETRIO, W.; GABRIAC, Q.; PASINI, A.; KORASAKI, V.; OLIVEIRA, L.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; TORRES, E.; GALERANI, P. R.; GAZZIERO, D. L. P.; BENITO, N. P.; NUNES, D. H.; SANTOS, A.; FERREIRA, T.; NADOLNY, H. S.; BARTZ, M.; MASCHIO, W.; DUDAS, R. T.; ZAGATTO, M.; NIVA, C. C.; CLASEN, L.; SAUTTER, K.; FROUFE, L. C. M.; SEOANE, C. E. S.; MORAES, A. de; JAMES, S.; ALBERTON, O.; JÚNIOR, O. B.; SARAIVA, O. F.; GARCIA, A.; OLIVEIRA, E.; CÉSAR, R.; CORREA-FERREIRA, B. S.; BRUZ, L. S. M.; SILVA, E. da; CARDOSO, G. B. X.; LAVELLE, P.; VELÁSQUEZ, E.; CREMONESI, M.; PARRON, L. M.; BAGGIO, A. J.; NEVES, E. J. M.; HUNGRIA, M.; CAMPOS, T. A.; SILVA, V. L. da; REISSMANN, C. B.; CONRADO, A. C.; BOUILLET, J. D.; GONÇALVES, J. L. M.; BRANDANI, C. B.; VIANI, R. A. G.; PAULA, R. R.; LACLAU, J.; PEÑA-VENEGAS, C. P.; PERES, C.; DECAËNS, T.; PEY, B.; EISENHAUER, N.; COOPER, M.; MATHIEU, J. Soil macrofauna communities in Brazilian land-use systems. Biodiversity Data Journal, v. 12, e115000, 2024.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|  |
| 3. | | ARAÚJO, A. S.; ZUCCHI, R. A.; NORRBOM, A. L.; NANINI, F.; CORRÊA, A. S.; ALVARENGA, C. D.; SOUZA-FILHO, M. F.; NAVA, D. E.; SAVARIS, M. Integrative approach reveals the identity of Brazilian specimens previously recognized as Anastrepha dissimilis Stone, 1942 (Diptera: Tephritidae). Zootaxa, v. 5228, n. 3, p. 317–336, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 6. | | HYDE, K. D.; ABDEL-WAHAB, M. A.; ABDOLLAHZADEH, J.; ABEYWICKRAMA, P. D.; ABSALAN, S.; AFSHARI, N.; AINSWORTH, A. M.; AKULOV, O. Y.; ALEOSHIN, V. V.; AL-SADI, A. M.; ALVARADO, P.; ALVES, A.; ALVES-SILVA, G.; AMALFI, M.; AMIRA, Y.; AMUHENAGE, T. B.; ANDERSON, J. L.; ANTONÍN, V.; AOUALI, S.; APTROOT, A.; APURILLO, C. C. S.; ARAÚJO, J. P. M.; ARIYAWANSA, H. A.; ARMAND, A.; ARUMUGAM, E.; ASGHARI, R.; ASSIS, D. M. A.; ATIENZA, V.; AVASTHI, S.; AZEVEDO, E.; BAHKALI, A. H.; BAKHSHI, M.; BANIHASHEMI, Z.; BAO, D. F.; BARAL, H. O.; BARATA, M.; BARBOSA, F. R.; BARBOSA, R. N.; BARRETO, R. W.; BASCHIEN, C.; BELAMESIATSEVA, D. B.; BENNETT REUEL, M.; BERA, I.; BEZERRA, J. D. P.; BEZERRA, J. L.; BHAT, D. J.; BHUNJUN, C. S.; BIANCHINOTTI, M. V.; BŁASZKOWSKI, J.; BLONDELLE, A.; BOEKHOUT, T.; BONITO, G.; BOONMEE, S.; BOONYUEN, N.; BREGANT, C.; BUCHANAN, P.; BUNDHUN, D.; BURGAUD, G.; BURGESS, T.; BUYCK, B.; CABARROI-HERNÁNDEZ, M.; CÁCERES, M. E. S.; CAEIRO, M. F.; CAI, L.; CAI, M. F.; CALABON, M. S.; CALAÇA, F. J. S.; CALLALLI, M.; CAMARA, M. P. S.; CANO-LIRA, J. F.; CANTILLO, T.; CAO, B.; CARLAVILLA, J. R.; CARVALHO, A.; CASTAÑEDA-RUIZ, R. F.; CASTLEBURY, L.; CASTRO-JAUREGUI, O.; CATANIA, M. D. V.; CAVALCANTI, L. H.; CAZABONNE, J.; CEDEÑO-SANCHEZ, M. L.; CHAHARMIRI-DOKHAHARANI, S.; CHAIWAN, N.; CHAKRABORTY, N.; CHAVERRI, P.; CHEEWANGKOON, R.; CHEN, C.; CHEN, C. Y.; CHEN, K. H.; CHEN, J.; CHEN, Q.; CHEN, W. H.; CHEN, Y. P.; CHETHANA, K. W. T.; COLEINE, C.; CONDÉ, T. O.; CORAZON-GUIVIN, M. A.; CORTÉS-PÉREZ, A.; COSTA-REZENDE, D. H.; COURTECUISSE, R.; CROUCH, J. A.; CROUS, P. W.; CUI, B. K.; CUI, Y. Y.; SILVA, D. K. A. da; SILVA, G. A. da; SILVA, I. R. da; SILVA, R. M. F. da; SILVA SANTOS, A. C. da; DAI, D. Q.; DAY, Y. C.; DAMM, U.; DARMOSTUK, V.; DAROODI ZOHA; DAS, K.; DAS, K.; DAVOODIAN, N.; DAVYDOV, E. A.; DAYARATHNE, M. C.; DECOCK, C.; DE GROOT, M. D.; DE KESEL, A.; DELA CRUZ, T. E. E.; DE LANGE, R.; DELGADO, G.; DENCHEV, C. M.; DENCHEV, T. T.; OLIVEIRA, N. T. de; SILVA, N. T. de; SOUZA, F. A. de; DENTINGER, B.; DEVADATHA, B.; DIANESE, J. C.; DIMA, B.; DINIZ, A. G.; DISSANAYAKE, A. J.; DISSANAYAKE, L. S.; DOĞAN, H. H.; DOILOM, M.; DOLATABADI, S.; DONG, W.; DONG, Z. Y.; SANTOS, L. A. dos; DRECHSLER-SANTOS, E. R.; DU, T. Y.; DUBEY, M. K.; DUTTA, A. K.; EGIDI, E.; ELLIOTT, T. F.; ELSHAHED, M. S.; ERDOĞDU, M.; ERTZ, D.; ETAYO, J.; EVANS, H. C.; FAN, X. L.; FAN, Y. G.; FEDOSOVA, A. G.; FELL, J.; FERNANDES, I.; FIRMINO, A. L.; FIUZA, P. O.; FLAKUS, A.; SOUZA, C. A. F. de; FRISVAD, J. C.; FRYAR, A. C.; GABALDÓN, T.; GAJANAYAKE, A. J.; GALINDO, L. J.; GANNIBAL, P. B.; GARCIA, D.; GARCÍA-SANDOVAL, S. R.; GARRIDO-BENAVENT, I.; GARZOLI, L.; GAUTAM, A. K.; GE, Z. W.; GENÉ, D. J.; GENTEKAKI, E.; GHOBAD-NEJHAD, M.; GIACHINI, A. J.; GIBERTONI, T. B.; GÓES-NETO, A.; GOMDOLA, D.; FARIAS, A. R. G. de. Global consortium for the classification of fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1960–2012, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 8. | | FERREIRA, T.; JAMES, S. W.; BARTZ, M. L. C.; LIMA, A. C. R. de; DUDAS, R.; BROWN, G. G. Distribution and diversity of earthworms in different land use systems in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Zootaxa, v. 5255, n. 1, p. 399-416, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 9. | | MOURA, F. T.; HELENE, L. C. F.; RIBEIRO, R. A.; NOGUEIRA, M. A.; HUNGRIA, M. The outstanding diversity of rhizobia microsymbionts of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Mato Grosso do Sul, central-western Brazil, revealing new Rhizobium species. Archives of Microbiology, v. 205, 325, 2023. 16 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 12. | | OLIVEIRA, V. A. de; LUMBRERAS, J. F.; COELHO, M. R.; SANTOS, G. G.; SEVERIANO, E. da C.; COLLIER, L. S.; RIOS, A. J. W.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; UHLMANN, A.; RAMOS, M. R.; CALDERANO, S. B. Solos da XIV Reunião Brasileira de Classificação e Correlação de Solos (RCC de Goiás e Tocantins). In: SANTOS, G. G.; OLIVEIRA, V. A. de; LUMBRERAS, J. F.; COELHO, M. R.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; MADARI, B. E. (ed.). Guia de campo da XIV Reunião Brasileira de Classificação e Correlação de Solos: RCC de Goiás e Tocantins. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2023. E-book. cap. 7.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura; Embrapa Solos. |
|  |
| 15. | | ROSADO, A. W. C.; BOARI, A. de J.; RAMOS, D. O.; CUSTÓDIO, F. A.; QUADROS, A. F. F.; BATISTA, I. C. A.; PEREIRA, O. L. Pseudopestalotiopsis elaeidis associated with leaf spots on Cycas revoluta in Brazil. Forest Pathology, v. 53, n. 2, e12808, Apr. 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 16. | | ANJOS, L. H. C. dos; PEREIRA, M. G.; FONTANA, A.; COSTA, A. M. da; LOSS, A. Síntese das discussões e recomendações da XIV Reunião Brasileira de Classificação e Correlação de Solos (XIV RCC) para o aprimoramento do Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos (SiBCS). In: SANTOS, G. G.; OLIVEIRA, V. A. de; LUMBRERAS, J. F.; COELHO, M. R.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; MADARI, B. E. (ed.). Guia de campo da XIV Reunião Brasileira de Classificação e Correlação de Solos: RCC de Goiás e Tocantins. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2023. E-book. cap. 23.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 18. | | Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. Taxon, v. 71, n. 1, p. 178-198, Feb. 2022. Autores Embrapa: Bruno Machado Teles Walter, Gustavo Heiden, José Francisco Montenegro Valls, Luciano de Bem Bianchetti, Marcelo Fragomeni Simon, Marta Camargo de Assis, Taciana Barbosa Cavalcanti.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 20. | | WALKER, P. J.; ASTUA, J. de F.; BEJERMAN, N.; BLASDELL.; BREYTA, R.; FOOKS, A. R.; KONDO, H.; KURATH, G.; KUZMIN, I. V.; RAMOS-GONZÁLEZ, P. L.; SHI, M.; STONE, D. M.; TESH, R. B.; TORDO, N.; VASILAKIS, N.; WHITFIELD, A. E. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Rhabdoviridae 2022. Journal of General Virology, jun. v.103, n. 6, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 3.971 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
02/03/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/03/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Título: |
Brazilian Flora 2020: Leveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Taxon, v. 71, n. 1, p. 178-198, Feb. 2022. |
|
DOI: |
doi.org/10.1002/tax.12640 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Autores Embrapa: Bruno Machado Teles Walter, Gustavo Heiden, José Francisco Montenegro Valls, Luciano de Bem Bianchetti, Marcelo Fragomeni Simon, Marta Camargo de Assis, Taciana Barbosa Cavalcanti. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis, concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Brazil, showing the power of scientific collaboration to reach ambitious goals. This paper presents an overview of the Brazilian Flora 2020 and provides taxonomic and spatial updates on the algae, fungi, and plants found in one of the world's most biodiverse countries. We further identify collection gaps and summarize future goals that extend beyond 2020. Our results show that Brazil is home to 46,975 native species of algae, fungi, and plants, of which 19,669 are endemic to the country. The data compiled to date suggests that the Atlantic Rainforest might be the most diverse Brazilian domain for all plant groups except gymnosperms, which are most diverse in the Amazon. However, scientific knowledge of Brazilian diversity is still unequally distributed, with the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado being the most intensively sampled and studied biomes in the country. In times of ?scientific reductionism?, with botanical and mycological sciences suffering pervasive depreciation in recent decades, the first online Flora of Brazil 2020 significantly enhanced the quality and quantity of taxonomic data available for algae, fungi, and plants from Brazil. This project also made all the information freely available online, providing a firm foundation for future research and for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of the Brazilian funga and flora. MenosThe shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis, concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Braz... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Taxonomia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232067/1/TAXON-2021-Brazilian-Flora-2020-Leveraging-the-power-of-a-collaborative-scientific-network.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03527naa a2200157 a 4500
001 2140476
005 2022-03-02
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $adoi.org/10.1002/tax.12640$2DOI
245 $aBrazilian Flora 2020$bLeveraging the power of a collaborative scientific network.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aAutores Embrapa: Bruno Machado Teles Walter, Gustavo Heiden, José Francisco Montenegro Valls, Luciano de Bem Bianchetti, Marcelo Fragomeni Simon, Marta Camargo de Assis, Taciana Barbosa Cavalcanti.
520 $aThe shortage of reliable primary taxonomic data limits the description of biological taxa and the understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes, complicating biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary studies. This deficit creates a significant taxonomic impediment to biodiversity research and conservation planning. The taxonomic impediment and the biodiversity crisis are widely recognized, highlighting the urgent need for reliable taxonomic data. Over the past decade, numerous countries worldwide have devoted considerable effort to Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), which called for the preparation of a working list of all known plant species by 2010 and an online world Flora by 2020. Brazil is a megadiverse country, home to more of the world's known plant species than any other country. Despite that, Flora Brasiliensis, concluded in 1906, was the last comprehensive treatment of the Brazilian flora. The lack of accurate estimates of the number of species of algae, fungi, and plants occurring in Brazil contributes to the prevailing taxonomic impediment and delays progress towards the GSPC targets. Over the past 12 years, a legion of taxonomists motivated to meet Target 1 of the GSPC, worked together to gather and integrate knowledge on the algal, plant, and fungal diversity of Brazil. Overall, a team of about 980 taxonomists joined efforts in a highly collaborative project that used cybertaxonomy to prepare an updated Flora of Brazil, showing the power of scientific collaboration to reach ambitious goals. This paper presents an overview of the Brazilian Flora 2020 and provides taxonomic and spatial updates on the algae, fungi, and plants found in one of the world's most biodiverse countries. We further identify collection gaps and summarize future goals that extend beyond 2020. Our results show that Brazil is home to 46,975 native species of algae, fungi, and plants, of which 19,669 are endemic to the country. The data compiled to date suggests that the Atlantic Rainforest might be the most diverse Brazilian domain for all plant groups except gymnosperms, which are most diverse in the Amazon. However, scientific knowledge of Brazilian diversity is still unequally distributed, with the Atlantic Rainforest and the Cerrado being the most intensively sampled and studied biomes in the country. In times of ?scientific reductionism?, with botanical and mycological sciences suffering pervasive depreciation in recent decades, the first online Flora of Brazil 2020 significantly enhanced the quality and quantity of taxonomic data available for algae, fungi, and plants from Brazil. This project also made all the information freely available online, providing a firm foundation for future research and for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of the Brazilian funga and flora.
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aTaxonomia
773 $tTaxon$gv. 71, n. 1, p. 178-198, Feb. 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
