| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/12/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/09/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MACHADO, P. G.; RAMPAZO, N. A. M.; PICOLI, M. C. A.; MIRANDA, C. G.; DUFT, D. G.; JESUS, K. R. E. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
PEDRO GERBER MACHADO, FEM-UNICAMP; NURIA APARECIDA MIATTO RAMPAZO, FEM-UNICAMP; MICHELLE CRISTINA ARAUJO PICOLI, INPE; CAUA GUILHERME MIRANDA, FEM-UNICAMP; DANIEL GARBELLINI DUFT, CTBE-CNPEM; KATIA REGINA EVARISTO DE JESUS, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
Analysis of socioeconomic and environmental sensitivity of sugarcane cultivation using a geographic information system. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Land Use Policy, v. 69, p. 64-74, 2017. |
|
ISSN: |
0264-8377 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.039 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The global interest in biofuels has increased significantly in recent years, mainly due to the concern about climate change. In Brazil, the land area under sugarcane cultivation has expanded in unprecedented ways to meet the increasing ethanol demand of both the domestic and international markets. São Paulo is the Brazilian state with the highest production of sugarcane, and the expansion of this activity can impact both the environment and society. The purpose of this paper was to assess and map the sensitivity of the areas used for sugarcane cultivation in São Paulo state and to provide a holistic approach to sugarcane production from the sustainability perspective by integrating indicators of the environmental, social and economic spheres without focusing on one single element. Five environmental indicators (related to water resources, slope, environmental conservation areas, land use and agricultural potential) and six socioeconomic indicators (related to employment, income, education, gender equality, child labor and forced labor) were selected for the analysis. The methodology comprised the Categorical Principal Components Analysis (CATPCA) technique and the spatialization of results in a Geographic Information System. The resulting maps of sensitivity show the patterns of the three retained principal components and provide an information-rich tool that the government can use in decision making, policy formulation and the integrated planning of land use, thereby enabling the identification of both hotspots and which issues should be prioritized. MenosThe global interest in biofuels has increased significantly in recent years, mainly due to the concern about climate change. In Brazil, the land area under sugarcane cultivation has expanded in unprecedented ways to meet the increasing ethanol demand of both the domestic and international markets. São Paulo is the Brazilian state with the highest production of sugarcane, and the expansion of this activity can impact both the environment and society. The purpose of this paper was to assess and map the sensitivity of the areas used for sugarcane cultivation in São Paulo state and to provide a holistic approach to sugarcane production from the sustainability perspective by integrating indicators of the environmental, social and economic spheres without focusing on one single element. Five environmental indicators (related to water resources, slope, environmental conservation areas, land use and agricultural potential) and six socioeconomic indicators (related to employment, income, education, gender equality, child labor and forced labor) were selected for the analysis. The methodology comprised the Categorical Principal Components Analysis (CATPCA) technique and the spatialization of results in a Geographic Information System. The resulting maps of sensitivity show the patterns of the three retained principal components and provide an information-rich tool that the government can use in decision making, policy formulation and the integrated planning of land use, thereby enabli... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Indicadores de sustentabilidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cana de açúcar; Impacto ambiental; Impacto econômico; Impacto social. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Economic indicators; Environmental indicators; Environmental sustainability; Social sustainability; Sugarcane. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02609naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2082664
005 2022-09-15
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0264-8377
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.039$2DOI
100 1 $aMACHADO, P. G.
245 $aAnalysis of socioeconomic and environmental sensitivity of sugarcane cultivation using a geographic information system.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aThe global interest in biofuels has increased significantly in recent years, mainly due to the concern about climate change. In Brazil, the land area under sugarcane cultivation has expanded in unprecedented ways to meet the increasing ethanol demand of both the domestic and international markets. São Paulo is the Brazilian state with the highest production of sugarcane, and the expansion of this activity can impact both the environment and society. The purpose of this paper was to assess and map the sensitivity of the areas used for sugarcane cultivation in São Paulo state and to provide a holistic approach to sugarcane production from the sustainability perspective by integrating indicators of the environmental, social and economic spheres without focusing on one single element. Five environmental indicators (related to water resources, slope, environmental conservation areas, land use and agricultural potential) and six socioeconomic indicators (related to employment, income, education, gender equality, child labor and forced labor) were selected for the analysis. The methodology comprised the Categorical Principal Components Analysis (CATPCA) technique and the spatialization of results in a Geographic Information System. The resulting maps of sensitivity show the patterns of the three retained principal components and provide an information-rich tool that the government can use in decision making, policy formulation and the integrated planning of land use, thereby enabling the identification of both hotspots and which issues should be prioritized.
650 $aEconomic indicators
650 $aEnvironmental indicators
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aSocial sustainability
650 $aSugarcane
650 $aCana de açúcar
650 $aImpacto ambiental
650 $aImpacto econômico
650 $aImpacto social
653 $aIndicadores de sustentabilidade
700 1 $aRAMPAZO, N. A. M.
700 1 $aPICOLI, M. C. A.
700 1 $aMIRANDA, C. G.
700 1 $aDUFT, D. G.
700 1 $aJESUS, K. R. E. de
773 $tLand Use Policy$gv. 69, p. 64-74, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/10/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/10/2021 |
|
Autoria: |
SOUZA, J. M. de; CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; SILVEIRA, D. L.; ULIANA, D. B.; LOREGIAN, M. V.; DUMKE, G. E.; WESCHENFELDER, M. A. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
JÉSSICA MARONEZ DE SOUZA, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciência Rurais, Departamento de Fitotecnia; ALBERTO CARGNELUTTI FILHO, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciência Rurais, Departamento de Fitotecnia; DANIELA LIXINSKI SILVEIRA, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciência Rurais, Departamento de Fitotecnia; DANIELA BARBIERI ULIANA, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciência Rurais, Departamento de Fitotecnia; MARCOS VINÍCIUS LOREGIAN, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciência Rurais, Departamento de Fitotecnia; GABRIEL ELIAS DUMKE, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciência Rurais, Departamento de Fitotecnia; MARLON ADONAI GREGORY WESCHENFELDER, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciência Rurais, Departamento de Fitotecnia. |
|
Título: |
Marjoram phytomass at harvest intervals in summer and winter transplants. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 56, e02444, 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/ S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02444 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Título em português: Fitomassa de manjerona em intervalos de colheita em transplantes no verão e no inverno. |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT - The objective of this work was to determine the harvest interval for phytomass production of marjoram (Origanum majorana) in summer and winter transplants. Two independent experiments were performed in offground cultivation: one with a summer and another with a winter transplant, in a completely randomized design with five harvest intervals (30, 45, 60, 72, and 90 days) and four replicates. The fresh and dry masses of leaves, branches, and aerial part were determined. For each plant, the production accumulated in the harvests was calculated as affected by days after the transplant. The fresh matter mass of the leaves was higher at the intervals of 60 and 90 days, in the summer transplant, and of 72 and 90 days, in the winter transplant. Harvesting at intervals of 60 days in the summer transplant and of 72 days in the winter transplant are appropriate for marjoram phytomass production. RESUMO - O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o intervalo de colheita para produção de fitomassa de manjerona (Origanum majorana), em transplantes no verão e no inverno. Foram realizados dois experimentos independentes em cultivo fora do solo: um com transplante no verão e outro no inverno, em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com cinco intervalos de colheita (30, 45, 60, 72 e 90 dias) e quatro repetições. Foram determinadas as massas de matéria fresca e seca de folhas, ramos e parte aérea. Para cada planta, foi calculada a produção acumulada nas colheitas em função dos dias após o transplante. A massa de matéria fresca de folhas foi superior nos intervalos de 60 e 90 dias, no transplante de verão, e de 72 e 90 dias, no transplante de inverno. Colheitas em intervalos de 60 dias, no transplante de verão, e de 72 dias, no transplante de inverno, são apropriadas para produção de fitomassa de manjerona. MenosABSTRACT - The objective of this work was to determine the harvest interval for phytomass production of marjoram (Origanum majorana) in summer and winter transplants. Two independent experiments were performed in offground cultivation: one with a summer and another with a winter transplant, in a completely randomized design with five harvest intervals (30, 45, 60, 72, and 90 days) and four replicates. The fresh and dry masses of leaves, branches, and aerial part were determined. For each plant, the production accumulated in the harvests was calculated as affected by days after the transplant. The fresh matter mass of the leaves was higher at the intervals of 60 and 90 days, in the summer transplant, and of 72 and 90 days, in the winter transplant. Harvesting at intervals of 60 days in the summer transplant and of 72 days in the winter transplant are appropriate for marjoram phytomass production. RESUMO - O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o intervalo de colheita para produção de fitomassa de manjerona (Origanum majorana), em transplantes no verão e no inverno. Foram realizados dois experimentos independentes em cultivo fora do solo: um com transplante no verão e outro no inverno, em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com cinco intervalos de colheita (30, 45, 60, 72 e 90 dias) e quatro repetições. Foram determinadas as massas de matéria fresca e seca de folhas, ramos e parte aérea. Para cada planta, foi calculada a produção acumulada nas colheitas em função dos dias... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fitomassa; Manjerona. |
|
Thesagro: |
Colheita; Matéria Seca; Planta Medicinal; Produção; Transplante de Planta. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Harvesting; Marjoram; Medicinal plants; Origanum majorana; Phytomass; Transplanting (plants). |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/227342/1/Marjoram-phytomass-harvest-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03019naa a2200373 a 4500
001 2135723
005 2021-10-29
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/ S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02444$2DOI
100 1 $aSOUZA, J. M. de
245 $aMarjoram phytomass at harvest intervals in summer and winter transplants.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aTítulo em português: Fitomassa de manjerona em intervalos de colheita em transplantes no verão e no inverno.
520 $aABSTRACT - The objective of this work was to determine the harvest interval for phytomass production of marjoram (Origanum majorana) in summer and winter transplants. Two independent experiments were performed in offground cultivation: one with a summer and another with a winter transplant, in a completely randomized design with five harvest intervals (30, 45, 60, 72, and 90 days) and four replicates. The fresh and dry masses of leaves, branches, and aerial part were determined. For each plant, the production accumulated in the harvests was calculated as affected by days after the transplant. The fresh matter mass of the leaves was higher at the intervals of 60 and 90 days, in the summer transplant, and of 72 and 90 days, in the winter transplant. Harvesting at intervals of 60 days in the summer transplant and of 72 days in the winter transplant are appropriate for marjoram phytomass production. RESUMO - O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o intervalo de colheita para produção de fitomassa de manjerona (Origanum majorana), em transplantes no verão e no inverno. Foram realizados dois experimentos independentes em cultivo fora do solo: um com transplante no verão e outro no inverno, em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com cinco intervalos de colheita (30, 45, 60, 72 e 90 dias) e quatro repetições. Foram determinadas as massas de matéria fresca e seca de folhas, ramos e parte aérea. Para cada planta, foi calculada a produção acumulada nas colheitas em função dos dias após o transplante. A massa de matéria fresca de folhas foi superior nos intervalos de 60 e 90 dias, no transplante de verão, e de 72 e 90 dias, no transplante de inverno. Colheitas em intervalos de 60 dias, no transplante de verão, e de 72 dias, no transplante de inverno, são apropriadas para produção de fitomassa de manjerona.
650 $aHarvesting
650 $aMarjoram
650 $aMedicinal plants
650 $aOriganum majorana
650 $aPhytomass
650 $aTransplanting (plants)
650 $aColheita
650 $aMatéria Seca
650 $aPlanta Medicinal
650 $aProdução
650 $aTransplante de Planta
653 $aFitomassa
653 $aManjerona
700 1 $aCARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, D. L.
700 1 $aULIANA, D. B.
700 1 $aLOREGIAN, M. V.
700 1 $aDUMKE, G. E.
700 1 $aWESCHENFELDER, M. A. G.
773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira$gv. 56, e02444, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
