| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
| 1. |  | TORRES, A. R.; BRITO, B.; IMPERIAL, J.; PALACIOS, J. M.; CIAMPITTI, I. A.; RUIZ-ARGÜESO, T.; HUNGRIA, M. Hydrogen-uptake genes improve symbiotic efficiency in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, v. 113, p. 687-696, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|    |
| 3. | | CORASSA, G. M.; AMADO, T. J. C.; STRIEDER, M. L.; SCHWALBERT, R.; PIRES, J. L. F.; CARTER, P. R.; CIAMPITTI, I. A. Optimum soybean seeding rates by yield environment in southern Brazil. Agronomy Journal, v. 110, n. 6, p. 2430-2438, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 4. | | OLIVEIRA, S. M. de; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; CIAMPITTI, I. A.; PIEROZAN JUNIOR, C.; LAGO, B. C.; TRIVELIN, P. C. O.; FAVARIN, J. L. Understanding N timing in corn yield and fertilizer N recovery: an insight from an isotopic labeled-N determination. PLoS One, v. 13, n. 2, e0192776, Feb. 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|  |
| 6. | | CORASSA, G. M.; HANSEL, F. D.; LOLLATO, R.; PIRES, J. L. F.; SCHWALBERT, R.; AMADO, T. J. C.; GUARIENTI, E. M.; GAVIRAGHI, R.; BISOGNIN, M. B.; REIMCHE, G. B.; SANTI, A. L.; CIAMPITTI, I. A. Nitrogen management strategies to improve yield and dough properties in hard red spring wheat. Agronomy Journal, v. 110, n. 6, p. 2417-2429, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
01/07/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, S. M. de; CIAMPITTI, I. A.; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; PIEROZAN JUNIOR, C.; TRIVELIN, P. C. O.; FAVARIN, J. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
SILAS MACIEL DE OLIVEIRA, ESALQ; IGNACIO A. CIAMPITTI, KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY; RODRIGO ESTEVAM MUNHOZ DE ALMEIDA, CNPASA; CLOVIS PIEROZAN JUNIOR; PAULO CESAR OCHEUZE TRIVELIN, CENA; JOSE LAERCIO FAVARIN, ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Closing the nitrogen budget of intercropped maize and palisadegrass. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
European Journal of Agronomy, v. 119, 126093, 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
1161-0301 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126093 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In tropical agriculture, maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) is considered a highly relevant cropping system to deliver both residue and forage. However, the benefits of inclusion of palisadegrass in maize systems and its influence on fertilizer dynamics and nitrogen (N) budget as well as the period after maize harvest for which palisadegrass continues to grow remain unclear. Thus, we conducted field studies to determine crop growth, end-season biomass, N fertilizer recovery, and overall N budget between
an intercrop and a monoculture at two different sites during conventional and late-planted maize seasons. The cropping systems evaluated were maize and palisadegrass in monocultures and two intercrop patterns, serving as cover crop or forage with simulated grazing. From planting to grain harvest, intercrop patterns did not affect grain yield, final N content, and N fertilizer dynamics. Post-harvest, palisadegrass from intercrop patterns improved biomass from 1 to 10 Mg ha?1 and N content from 8 to 300 kg ha?1, relative to fallow after maize monoculture. Contribution of palisadegrass intercropping on N fertilizer recovery was low at approximately 4.5 kg ha-1 when both the crops were growing simultaneously and approximately 2.4 kg ha?1 following maize grain harvest. In three out of four sites over 2 years, intercrop patterns did not affect total N fertilizer recovery compared with their monocultures, averaging at approximately 51 %. Advantages of maize-palisadegrass intercropping on biomass, yield, and N cycling were documented at the site where maize was planted during the conventional season, despite the yearly variation in weather conditions. A negative N budget of ?230 kg ha?1 was estimated when grazing was simulated during the conventional maize planting season, suggesting greater N
requirements of the intercropped palisadegrass when serving as forage. MenosIn tropical agriculture, maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) is considered a highly relevant cropping system to deliver both residue and forage. However, the benefits of inclusion of palisadegrass in maize systems and its influence on fertilizer dynamics and nitrogen (N) budget as well as the period after maize harvest for which palisadegrass continues to grow remain unclear. Thus, we conducted field studies to determine crop growth, end-season biomass, N fertilizer recovery, and overall N budget between
an intercrop and a monoculture at two different sites during conventional and late-planted maize seasons. The cropping systems evaluated were maize and palisadegrass in monocultures and two intercrop patterns, serving as cover crop or forage with simulated grazing. From planting to grain harvest, intercrop patterns did not affect grain yield, final N content, and N fertilizer dynamics. Post-harvest, palisadegrass from intercrop patterns improved biomass from 1 to 10 Mg ha?1 and N content from 8 to 300 kg ha?1, relative to fallow after maize monoculture. Contribution of palisadegrass intercropping on N fertilizer recovery was low at approximately 4.5 kg ha-1 when both the crops were growing simultaneously and approximately 2.4 kg ha?1 following maize grain harvest. In three out of four sites over 2 years, intercrop patterns did not affect total N fertilizer recovery compared with their monocultures, averaging at approximately... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Difference method; Integrated farming; Nitrogen recovery efficiency. |
|
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria Brizantha; Consorciação de Cultura; Milho; Nitrogênio; Zea Mays. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Corn; Nitrogen balance. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02892naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2123518
005 2020-07-01
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1161-0301
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126093$2DOI
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, S. M. de
245 $aClosing the nitrogen budget of intercropped maize and palisadegrass.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aIn tropical agriculture, maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) is considered a highly relevant cropping system to deliver both residue and forage. However, the benefits of inclusion of palisadegrass in maize systems and its influence on fertilizer dynamics and nitrogen (N) budget as well as the period after maize harvest for which palisadegrass continues to grow remain unclear. Thus, we conducted field studies to determine crop growth, end-season biomass, N fertilizer recovery, and overall N budget between an intercrop and a monoculture at two different sites during conventional and late-planted maize seasons. The cropping systems evaluated were maize and palisadegrass in monocultures and two intercrop patterns, serving as cover crop or forage with simulated grazing. From planting to grain harvest, intercrop patterns did not affect grain yield, final N content, and N fertilizer dynamics. Post-harvest, palisadegrass from intercrop patterns improved biomass from 1 to 10 Mg ha?1 and N content from 8 to 300 kg ha?1, relative to fallow after maize monoculture. Contribution of palisadegrass intercropping on N fertilizer recovery was low at approximately 4.5 kg ha-1 when both the crops were growing simultaneously and approximately 2.4 kg ha?1 following maize grain harvest. In three out of four sites over 2 years, intercrop patterns did not affect total N fertilizer recovery compared with their monocultures, averaging at approximately 51 %. Advantages of maize-palisadegrass intercropping on biomass, yield, and N cycling were documented at the site where maize was planted during the conventional season, despite the yearly variation in weather conditions. A negative N budget of ?230 kg ha?1 was estimated when grazing was simulated during the conventional maize planting season, suggesting greater N requirements of the intercropped palisadegrass when serving as forage.
650 $aCorn
650 $aNitrogen balance
650 $aBrachiaria Brizantha
650 $aConsorciação de Cultura
650 $aMilho
650 $aNitrogênio
650 $aZea Mays
653 $aDifference method
653 $aIntegrated farming
653 $aNitrogen recovery efficiency
700 1 $aCIAMPITTI, I. A.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. E. M. de
700 1 $aPIEROZAN JUNIOR, C.
700 1 $aTRIVELIN, P. C. O.
700 1 $aFAVARIN, J. L.
773 $tEuropean Journal of Agronomy$gv. 119, 126093, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
