| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/01/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
ABREU, L. S. de; BELLON, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUCIMAR SANTIAGO DE ABREU, CNPMA; STÉPHANE BELLON, INRA. |
|
Título: |
The dynamics and recomposition of agroecology in Latin America. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: HALBERG, N.; MULLER, A. (Ed.). Organic agriculture for sustainable livelihoods. London: Routeledge, 2012. p. 223-245. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agroecology be a new scientific paradigm leading to specific research topics, an alternative way to do research, reconnectin science, nature and society? Will it contribute to sustainable livelihoods, especially for aml y armers, or be a cornerstone for the development of agricultural enterprises? Will it be appropriated by social movements to support agricultural and rural transitions? ln order to contribute to answer these issues, this chapter includes five sections. After describing our approach, we show that family farming is socially and economically important in Latin Anlerica, with part of the certified production originating therefrom. We stress the need for taking into accoun tlocal conditions and differentiated groups of family producers characterized by both social and cultural differences and diversity of ecologically inspired production styles. Another aspect dealt with is the history of alternative agriculture from the 1970s, with identification of its successive events and characteristics, and the dynamics of alternative agriculture into the building up of agroecology and its different features in Latin Arnerica. Then, we analyse the current status of agroecology structuring in Latin America, i.e. the elements favoring the setting up of research and development programmes, as well as the participation of social movements . MenosThe growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agro... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroecologia; América Latina. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Agroecology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03403naa a2200169 a 4500
001 1944301
005 2021-07-14
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aABREU, L. S. de
245 $aThe dynamics and recomposition of agroecology in Latin America.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2012
520 $aThe growth of ecological agriculture in some Latin Anlerican countries has been supported Dr srudied by several scholars. Among them, Brandenburg (2002) identified three important phases in its trajectory: (i) emergence of a movement against industrialization of agricultural production; (ii) formation of new groups and social organization forms; and (iii) institutionalization of ecologically based agriculture, accompanied by a partial dilution of its principies. However, a fourth stage of redefinition and recomposition of several alternative agriculture versions can be seen, in which agroeco\ogy occupies an important place and influence in agriculture (Ollivier and Bellon, 2011) and rural developmenr (Caporal, 2006). Accordingly, we intend to retrace this process of agroecology recomposition in Latin America, by describing its characteristics and determinants. This is a gradual alternative agriculture regrouping process, under the umbrella of agroecology, whose realm is defended by numerous social players. Agroecology can be viewed as a scientific proposaI, a set of practices and a social movement (Wezel et aI., 2009). It relies on ecological and social principles and aims to promote changes in the conventional agricultural production process, through an interdisciplinary approach, with the support of participative research work (interaction with rural development players and farmers) and valuing local or lay knowledge. Its future is at stake in this fourth moment. Will agroecology be a new scientific paradigm leading to specific research topics, an alternative way to do research, reconnectin science, nature and society? Will it contribute to sustainable livelihoods, especially for aml y armers, or be a cornerstone for the development of agricultural enterprises? Will it be appropriated by social movements to support agricultural and rural transitions? ln order to contribute to answer these issues, this chapter includes five sections. After describing our approach, we show that family farming is socially and economically important in Latin Anlerica, with part of the certified production originating therefrom. We stress the need for taking into accoun tlocal conditions and differentiated groups of family producers characterized by both social and cultural differences and diversity of ecologically inspired production styles. Another aspect dealt with is the history of alternative agriculture from the 1970s, with identification of its successive events and characteristics, and the dynamics of alternative agriculture into the building up of agroecology and its different features in Latin Arnerica. Then, we analyse the current status of agroecology structuring in Latin America, i.e. the elements favoring the setting up of research and development programmes, as well as the participation of social movements .
650 $aAgroecology
653 $aAgroecologia
653 $aAmérica Latina
700 1 $aBELLON, S.
773 $tIn: HALBERG, N.; MULLER, A. (Ed.). Organic agriculture for sustainable livelihoods. London: Routeledge, 2012. p. 223-245.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 180 | |
| 6. |  | SALES, R. M. O. B.; SILVA, F. R. da. FishEST: a tool that mines est libraries for genes differentially expressed. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SBBq, 36.; IUBMB CONFERENCE, 10., 2007, Salvador, BA. Infectious diseases: biochemistry of parasites, vectors and hosts: program and abstracts. São Paulo, SP: Brazilian Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2007.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|   |
| 10. | | VINECKY, F.; BRITO, K. M. de; SILVA, F. R. da; ANDRADE, A. C. Análise in silico de genes potencialmente envolvidos na resposta aos estresses abióticos, presentes na base de dados do genoma café. In: SIMPÓSIO DE PESQUISA DOS CAFÉS DO BRASIL, 4., 2005, Londrina. Anais... Brasília: Embrapa Café, 2005. 1 CD-ROM. Núcleo: Biotecnologia aplicada à cadeia agroindustrial do café, p. 1.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|  |
| 12. | | VINECKY, F.; RODRIGUES, G. C.; SILVA, F. R. da; ANDRADE, A. C. Análise da expressão gênica da parte aérea de cafeeiro em condições de déficit hídrico. ENCONTRO DO TALENTO ESTUDANTIL DA EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENETICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA, 8., 2003, Brasília, DF. Anais: resumos dos trabalhos. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, 2003. p. 29| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 13. | | ARAÚJO, M. M. M.; SILVA, F. R. da; MARINHO, V. L.; SOUZA JÚNIOR, M. T. Decodificando o genoma do vírus da "meleira": parte 2. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 30, p. 164, ago. 2005. Suplemento: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FITOPATOLOGIA, 38., 2005, Brasília, DF. p. 183.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|  |
| 20. | | BARBOSA, A. V.; SALES, R. M. O. B.; ANDRADE, A. C.; SILVA, F. R. da. CoffEST: yet another resource for Coffea spp. EST analysis... well, this one is publically available. In: INTERNATIONAL PLANT & ANIMAL GENOMES CONFERENCE, 17., 2009, San Diego, CA. [Proceedings...]. [S. l.: s.n.], 2009. P806| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 180 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
