| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Instrumentação. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpdia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/09/2025 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/10/2025 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
VILLAS BOAS, P. R.; MILORI, D. M. B. P.; MARTIN NETO, L. |
|
Afiliação: |
PAULINO RIBEIRO VILLAS BOAS, CNPDIA; DEBORA MARCONDES BASTOS PEREIRA, CNPDIA; LADISLAU MARTIN NETO, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
LIBS for Rapid Soil Bulk Density and Carbon Stock Estimations: Toward Scalable Soil Carbon Monitoring. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2025 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
European Journal of Soil Science, v. 76, e70151, 2025. |
|
Páginas: |
14 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70151 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Measuring soil bulk density (as well as carbon content) is crucial for accurate soil carbon stock calculations. Given the growing interest in soil carbon sequestration on farmlands as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, effective large-scale field monitoring has become more important than ever. However, traditional methods for measuring soil bulk density, such as the core (volumetric cylinder) and clod methods, require undisturbed samples, making them labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly—due to the high complexity of sample collection and preparation. To overcome these challenges, we developed a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)-based method for efficient and cost-effective bulk density estimation that does not require undisturbed samples. We trained and evaluated LIBS-based models using a dataset of 880 diverse Brazilian soil samples, randomly split into 70% for training and 30% for testing. The LIBS-based models, combining discrete wavelet transform (DWT), feature selection via F-test for regression, and Ridge regression, achieved an R2 of 0.72 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.12gcm−3 on the test set for soil bulk density prediction. Furthermore, by combining LIBS-predicted soil bulk density with measured soil carbon concentration, we estimated soil carbon stock, achieving an R2 of 0.93 and an RMSE of 2.2MgCha−1 on the test set, indicating that the uncertainty in bulk density predictions has a minor impact on soil carbon stock estimations. To further streamline soil carbon stock estimation, we developed a model to directly predict soil carbon density—the product of soil carbon concentration and bulk density—using LIBS-derived spectral features, eliminating the need for separate measurements or estimations. Although this approach resulted in a lower R2 of 0.78 and a higher RMSE of 4.1MgCha−1, its performance was adequate for carbon stock prediction while simplifying the estimation process. These findings highlight the potential of LIBS as a rapid and effective tool for assessing soil bulk and carbon densities, contributing to sustainable soil management and climate change mitigation and adaptation. MenosMeasuring soil bulk density (as well as carbon content) is crucial for accurate soil carbon stock calculations. Given the growing interest in soil carbon sequestration on farmlands as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, effective large-scale field monitoring has become more important than ever. However, traditional methods for measuring soil bulk density, such as the core (volumetric cylinder) and clod methods, require undisturbed samples, making them labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly—due to the high complexity of sample collection and preparation. To overcome these challenges, we developed a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)-based method for efficient and cost-effective bulk density estimation that does not require undisturbed samples. We trained and evaluated LIBS-based models using a dataset of 880 diverse Brazilian soil samples, randomly split into 70% for training and 30% for testing. The LIBS-based models, combining discrete wavelet transform (DWT), feature selection via F-test for regression, and Ridge regression, achieved an R2 of 0.72 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.12gcm−3 on the test set for soil bulk density prediction. Furthermore, by combining LIBS-predicted soil bulk density with measured soil carbon concentration, we estimated soil carbon stock, achieving an R2 of 0.93 and an RMSE of 2.2MgCha−1 on the test set, indicating that the uncertainty in bulk density predictions has a minor impact on soil carbon stock estim... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; Soil bulk density; Soil carbon density; Soil carbon sequestration; Soil carbon stock. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02942naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2178582
005 2025-10-28
008 2025 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70151$2DOI
100 1 $aVILLAS BOAS, P. R.
245 $aLIBS for Rapid Soil Bulk Density and Carbon Stock Estimations$bToward Scalable Soil Carbon Monitoring.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2025
300 $a14 p.
520 $aMeasuring soil bulk density (as well as carbon content) is crucial for accurate soil carbon stock calculations. Given the growing interest in soil carbon sequestration on farmlands as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, effective large-scale field monitoring has become more important than ever. However, traditional methods for measuring soil bulk density, such as the core (volumetric cylinder) and clod methods, require undisturbed samples, making them labour-intensive, time-consuming and costly—due to the high complexity of sample collection and preparation. To overcome these challenges, we developed a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)-based method for efficient and cost-effective bulk density estimation that does not require undisturbed samples. We trained and evaluated LIBS-based models using a dataset of 880 diverse Brazilian soil samples, randomly split into 70% for training and 30% for testing. The LIBS-based models, combining discrete wavelet transform (DWT), feature selection via F-test for regression, and Ridge regression, achieved an R2 of 0.72 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.12gcm−3 on the test set for soil bulk density prediction. Furthermore, by combining LIBS-predicted soil bulk density with measured soil carbon concentration, we estimated soil carbon stock, achieving an R2 of 0.93 and an RMSE of 2.2MgCha−1 on the test set, indicating that the uncertainty in bulk density predictions has a minor impact on soil carbon stock estimations. To further streamline soil carbon stock estimation, we developed a model to directly predict soil carbon density—the product of soil carbon concentration and bulk density—using LIBS-derived spectral features, eliminating the need for separate measurements or estimations. Although this approach resulted in a lower R2 of 0.78 and a higher RMSE of 4.1MgCha−1, its performance was adequate for carbon stock prediction while simplifying the estimation process. These findings highlight the potential of LIBS as a rapid and effective tool for assessing soil bulk and carbon densities, contributing to sustainable soil management and climate change mitigation and adaptation.
653 $aLaser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
653 $aSoil bulk density
653 $aSoil carbon density
653 $aSoil carbon sequestration
653 $aSoil carbon stock
700 1 $aMILORI, D. M. B. P.
700 1 $aMARTIN NETO, L.
773 $tEuropean Journal of Soil Science$gv. 76, e70151, 2025.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | CARGNIN, A.; SOUZA, M. A. de; ROCHA, V. S.; MACHADO, J. C.; PICCINI, E. Tolerância ao estresse térmico em genótipos de trigo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 41, n. 8, p. 1269-1276, ago. 2006 Título em inglês: Tolerance to thermic stress in wheat genotypes.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
