| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/01/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/10/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
BUENO, S. C. S.; TOKUNAGA, T.; BERTI, A. J.; COUTINHO, E. L.; MAIA, A. de H. N.; YAMANISH, O. K. |
|
Afiliação: |
S. C. S. BUENO, CATI; T. TOKUNAGA, CATI; A. J. BERTI, CATI; E. L. COUTINHO, CATI; ALINE DE HOLANDA NUNES MAIA, CNPMA; O. K. YAMANISH, Universidade de Brasília. |
|
Título: |
Grafting compatibility among eleven chestnut cultivars and hybrids. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2009 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CHESTNUT SYMPOSIUM, 4., 2009, Beijing. Acta Horticulturae, Leuven, n.844, p. 127-131. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Among the four commercial chestnut species the C. dentata (Marsh.) Boskh. and C. sativa P. Mill. has excellent quality but more susceptible to diseases when compared to C. mollissima Blume and C. crenata Siebold & Zucc. which has inferior quality but can be used as rootstocks. This work aimed to evaluate the behavior of chestnut varieties grafted in different rootstocks under São Bento do Sapucaí, São Paulo, Brazil condition. In 1986, eleven chestnut cultivars and hybrids - Ibuki (IB), Izumo (IZ), Kinchu (KI), KM1 (KM2), KM(2) KM(2), Moriowase (MO), Okuni (OK), Taishowase (TAI), Tamatsukuri (TAM), Tiodowase (TIO) and Senri (SEN) (only graft) ? were grafted each other resulting in hundred ten combinations. Fifteen-year later grafted trees with minimum of three plants were evaluated for tree height, trunk diameter above and below graft union and graft compatibility. Randomized blocks with three replications were submitted to analysis of variance for tree height and trunk diameter. Grouping analysis using the PROC CLUSTER ? SAS system was used to describe the pattern of variance among different combinations. Seventy eight combinations in hundred ten showed perfect grafting compatibility 6 months after grafting. Forty seven combinations showed incompatibility after transplanting and the dieback rate in each combination ranged from 25 to 100%. Among seventy eight combinations established in the field twenty six had enough plants for evaluation fifteen-year later. Tree height and trunk diameter showed highly significant difference among the combinations. The highest plant (6 m) was grafted on Moriowase and Tamatsukuri which showed the highest compatibility as rootstock. The harvesting season is from November to May where MOR, IB, TAM, OK and TAI behave as early-season-cultivar and SEN the latest one. MenosAmong the four commercial chestnut species the C. dentata (Marsh.) Boskh. and C. sativa P. Mill. has excellent quality but more susceptible to diseases when compared to C. mollissima Blume and C. crenata Siebold & Zucc. which has inferior quality but can be used as rootstocks. This work aimed to evaluate the behavior of chestnut varieties grafted in different rootstocks under São Bento do Sapucaí, São Paulo, Brazil condition. In 1986, eleven chestnut cultivars and hybrids - Ibuki (IB), Izumo (IZ), Kinchu (KI), KM1 (KM2), KM(2) KM(2), Moriowase (MO), Okuni (OK), Taishowase (TAI), Tamatsukuri (TAM), Tiodowase (TIO) and Senri (SEN) (only graft) ? were grafted each other resulting in hundred ten combinations. Fifteen-year later grafted trees with minimum of three plants were evaluated for tree height, trunk diameter above and below graft union and graft compatibility. Randomized blocks with three replications were submitted to analysis of variance for tree height and trunk diameter. Grouping analysis using the PROC CLUSTER ? SAS system was used to describe the pattern of variance among different combinations. Seventy eight combinations in hundred ten showed perfect grafting compatibility 6 months after grafting. Forty seven combinations showed incompatibility after transplanting and the dieback rate in each combination ranged from 25 to 100%. Among seventy eight combinations established in the field twenty six had enough plants for evaluation fifteen-year later. Tree height and ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Castanha. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02413nam a2200181 a 4500
001 1580361
005 2018-10-15
008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBUENO, S. C. S.
245 $aGrafting compatibility among eleven chestnut cultivars and hybrids.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CHESTNUT SYMPOSIUM, 4., 2009, Beijing. Acta Horticulturae, Leuven, n.844, p. 127-131.$c2009
520 $aAmong the four commercial chestnut species the C. dentata (Marsh.) Boskh. and C. sativa P. Mill. has excellent quality but more susceptible to diseases when compared to C. mollissima Blume and C. crenata Siebold & Zucc. which has inferior quality but can be used as rootstocks. This work aimed to evaluate the behavior of chestnut varieties grafted in different rootstocks under São Bento do Sapucaí, São Paulo, Brazil condition. In 1986, eleven chestnut cultivars and hybrids - Ibuki (IB), Izumo (IZ), Kinchu (KI), KM1 (KM2), KM(2) KM(2), Moriowase (MO), Okuni (OK), Taishowase (TAI), Tamatsukuri (TAM), Tiodowase (TIO) and Senri (SEN) (only graft) ? were grafted each other resulting in hundred ten combinations. Fifteen-year later grafted trees with minimum of three plants were evaluated for tree height, trunk diameter above and below graft union and graft compatibility. Randomized blocks with three replications were submitted to analysis of variance for tree height and trunk diameter. Grouping analysis using the PROC CLUSTER ? SAS system was used to describe the pattern of variance among different combinations. Seventy eight combinations in hundred ten showed perfect grafting compatibility 6 months after grafting. Forty seven combinations showed incompatibility after transplanting and the dieback rate in each combination ranged from 25 to 100%. Among seventy eight combinations established in the field twenty six had enough plants for evaluation fifteen-year later. Tree height and trunk diameter showed highly significant difference among the combinations. The highest plant (6 m) was grafted on Moriowase and Tamatsukuri which showed the highest compatibility as rootstock. The harvesting season is from November to May where MOR, IB, TAM, OK and TAI behave as early-season-cultivar and SEN the latest one.
650 $aCastanha
700 1 $aTOKUNAGA, T.
700 1 $aBERTI, A. J.
700 1 $aCOUTINHO, E. L.
700 1 $aMAIA, A. de H. N.
700 1 $aYAMANISH, O. K.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 292 | |
| 2. |  | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causadas por vírus. In: GARRIDO, L. da R.; HOFFMANN, A.; BOTTON, M. (Ed.). Boas práticas agrícolas na viticultura: manejo de pragas e doenças. Brasília, DF: SEBRAE; Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho: IBRAVIN, 2011. p. 53-74. (Boas Práticas Agrícolas - BPA; Uva para processamento, 4). Programa de Desenvolvimento da Cadeia Produtiva de Vinhos, Espumantes e Suco de Uva - PAS.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|    |
| 3. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causadas por vírus. IN: GARRIDO, L. da R.; HOFFMANN, A.; SILVEIRA, S. V. da. (Ed.). Produção integrada de uva para processamento: manejo de pragas e doenças. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. v. 4, cap. 3, p. 49-70.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 4. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causadas por vírus. In: HOFFMANN, A.; SILVEIRA, S. V.; GARRIDO, L.R. (Eds.). Manual Técnico de Boas Práticas Agrícolas - Uva para Processamento. Brasília, DF: SEBRAE; Bento Gonçalves, RS: IBRAVIN, 2016. pp. 151-171.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 5. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causador por vírus. IN: GARRIDO, L. da R.; HOFFMANN, A.; SILVEIRA, S. V. da (Ed.). Produção integrada de uva para processamento: manejo de pragas e doenças. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. v. 4, cap. 3, p. 49-70.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 10. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Vírus nas mudas. A Vindima, Flores da Cunha, v. 4, n. 30, p. 14, jun. 2011.| Tipo: Artigo de Divulgação na Mídia |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 11. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. (ed.). Uva para processamento: fitossanidade. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, 2003. 128 p. il. (Frutas do Brasil, 35). Inclui glossário.| Tipo: Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|  |
| 17. | | NICKEL, O.; FAJARDO, T. V. M. Detection of four viruses in apples and pears by real time RT-PCR using 5'-hydrolysis probes. Journal of the Brazilian Society for Virology, Novo Hamburgo, v. 18, p. 28-29, 2013. Resumo apresentado no XXIV Brazilian Congress of Virology & VIII Mercosur Meeting of Virology, September, 1 - 4, 2013 - Porto Seguro, Bahia.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 18. | | LIMA, M. F.; FAJARDO, T. V. M. Doenças causadas por vírus. 2. ed. rev. e ampl. In: LIMA, M. F.; MOREIRA, F. R. B. (Ed.). Uva de mesa: fitossanidade. 2. ed. rev. e ampl. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2012. cap. 4, p. 43-58. (Frutas do Brasil, 14).| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 19. | | KUHN, G. B.; FAJARDO, T. V. M. Doenças de uva. Cultivar Hortaliças e Frutas, Pelotas, v. 1, n. 1, p. 23-27, abr./maio 2000. p. 23-27 il.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: Nacional - C |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 20. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M.; EIRAS, M. Doenças virais em videiras. In:BUENO, C. J. (Org.). Doenças e pragas em videiras. São Paulo, SP: Instituto Biológico de São Paulo, nov. 2022. (online). (Boletim Técnico, 33). pp. 61-103.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 292 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
