| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Leite. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgl.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/02/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/02/2025 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
OSS, D. B.; MARCONDES, M. I.; MACHADO, F. S.; PEREIRA, L. G. R.; TOMICH, T. R.; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, G. O.; CHIZZOTTI, M. L.; FERREIRA, A. L.; CAMPOS, M. M.; MAURÍCIO, R. M.; CHAVES, A. V.; McALLISTER, T. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
DANIELA B. OSS, UFV; CAPES; MARCOS I. MARCONDES, UFV; FERNANDA SAMARINI MACHADO, CNPGL; LUIZ GUSTAVO RIBEIRO PEREIRA, CNPGL; THIERRY RIBEIRO TOMICH, CNPGL; GABRIEL O. RIBEIRO JUNIOR, CAPES; , AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA; MARIO LUIZ CHIZZOTTI, UFV; ALEXANDRE L. FERREIRA, UFSJ; MARIANA MAGALHAES CAMPOS, CNPGL; ROGÉRIO M. MAURÍCIO, UFSJ; ALEX V. CHAVES, FACULTY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE, SYDNEY; TIM A. MCALLISTER, AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA. |
|
Título: |
An evaluation of the face mask system based on short-term measurements compared with the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer, and respiration chamber techniques for measuring CH4 emissions. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 216, p. 49-57, 2016. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of the present study was to compare the shortterm measurement(30 min/day for 3 days) face mask system (FM), with SF6 tracer and respiration chamber (RC) techniques for measuring CH4 emissions from crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) yearling bulls fed at three intake levels. Data were derived from 17 individuals in a completely randomized design experiment in a repeated measures scheme. Bulls were fed a diet consisting of 59.6% corn silage and 40.4% concentrate on a DM basis at three levels of DM intake (DMI) of 1.2% of BW, 1.8% of BW and ad libitum. After an adaptation period, CH4 emissions were measured first using the SF6 tracer technique, followed by the FM and RC techniques, respectively. Daily CH4 emission (g/day) from bulls differed (P < 0.007) with CH4 measurements techniques, with highest emissions measured using RC (107.9 ± 15.36), followed by FM (103.2 ± 11.86) then SF6 tracer technique (87.9 ± 10.16). The CH4 emissions adjusted for differences in DMI and BW did not differ among techniques, averaging 21.5 g/kg DMI and 0.4 g/kg BW, respectively. Total CH4 emissions (g/day) were positively correlated with DMI as measured by all three techniques (SF6 r = 0.93; FM r = 0.93; RC r = 0.96). The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for CH4 emission (g/d) were 0.82, 0.82 and 0.74 for comparisons of SF6 vs RC, FM vs RC and FM vs SF6, respectively. The day-to-day (21.3%) and animal-to-animal (13.4%) variation in CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) was greater from bulls using the FM technique, compared to SF6 (18.8% and 6.8%, respectively) and RC (12.9% and 7.5%, respectively) techniques. We conclude that the short-term FM technique generated CH4 measurements that were comparable to those estimated using SF6 and chamber techniques across a range of DMI levels. However, the FM method may have limitations in terms of assessing enteric CH4 mitigation strategies that are applied over a short duration to low numbers of animals due to higher animal-to-animal and day-to-day coefficients of variation than either the SF6 or RC techniques. MenosThe objective of the present study was to compare the shortterm measurement(30 min/day for 3 days) face mask system (FM), with SF6 tracer and respiration chamber (RC) techniques for measuring CH4 emissions from crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) yearling bulls fed at three intake levels. Data were derived from 17 individuals in a completely randomized design experiment in a repeated measures scheme. Bulls were fed a diet consisting of 59.6% corn silage and 40.4% concentrate on a DM basis at three levels of DM intake (DMI) of 1.2% of BW, 1.8% of BW and ad libitum. After an adaptation period, CH4 emissions were measured first using the SF6 tracer technique, followed by the FM and RC techniques, respectively. Daily CH4 emission (g/day) from bulls differed (P < 0.007) with CH4 measurements techniques, with highest emissions measured using RC (107.9 ± 15.36), followed by FM (103.2 ± 11.86) then SF6 tracer technique (87.9 ± 10.16). The CH4 emissions adjusted for differences in DMI and BW did not differ among techniques, averaging 21.5 g/kg DMI and 0.4 g/kg BW, respectively. Total CH4 emissions (g/day) were positively correlated with DMI as measured by all three techniques (SF6 r = 0.93; FM r = 0.93; RC r = 0.96). The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for CH4 emission (g/d) were 0.82, 0.82 and 0.74 for comparisons of SF6 vs RC, FM vs RC and FM vs SF6, respectively. The day-to-day (21.3%) and animal-to-animal (13.4%) variation in CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) was greater from bulls using the... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Face mask; Respiration chamber; Short-term measurement. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
methane; sulfur hexafluoride. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03074naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2064073
005 2025-02-20
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOSS, D. B.
245 $aAn evaluation of the face mask system based on short-term measurements compared with the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer, and respiration chamber techniques for measuring CH4 emissions.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aThe objective of the present study was to compare the shortterm measurement(30 min/day for 3 days) face mask system (FM), with SF6 tracer and respiration chamber (RC) techniques for measuring CH4 emissions from crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) yearling bulls fed at three intake levels. Data were derived from 17 individuals in a completely randomized design experiment in a repeated measures scheme. Bulls were fed a diet consisting of 59.6% corn silage and 40.4% concentrate on a DM basis at three levels of DM intake (DMI) of 1.2% of BW, 1.8% of BW and ad libitum. After an adaptation period, CH4 emissions were measured first using the SF6 tracer technique, followed by the FM and RC techniques, respectively. Daily CH4 emission (g/day) from bulls differed (P < 0.007) with CH4 measurements techniques, with highest emissions measured using RC (107.9 ± 15.36), followed by FM (103.2 ± 11.86) then SF6 tracer technique (87.9 ± 10.16). The CH4 emissions adjusted for differences in DMI and BW did not differ among techniques, averaging 21.5 g/kg DMI and 0.4 g/kg BW, respectively. Total CH4 emissions (g/day) were positively correlated with DMI as measured by all three techniques (SF6 r = 0.93; FM r = 0.93; RC r = 0.96). The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for CH4 emission (g/d) were 0.82, 0.82 and 0.74 for comparisons of SF6 vs RC, FM vs RC and FM vs SF6, respectively. The day-to-day (21.3%) and animal-to-animal (13.4%) variation in CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) was greater from bulls using the FM technique, compared to SF6 (18.8% and 6.8%, respectively) and RC (12.9% and 7.5%, respectively) techniques. We conclude that the short-term FM technique generated CH4 measurements that were comparable to those estimated using SF6 and chamber techniques across a range of DMI levels. However, the FM method may have limitations in terms of assessing enteric CH4 mitigation strategies that are applied over a short duration to low numbers of animals due to higher animal-to-animal and day-to-day coefficients of variation than either the SF6 or RC techniques.
650 $amethane
650 $asulfur hexafluoride
653 $aFace mask
653 $aRespiration chamber
653 $aShort-term measurement
700 1 $aMARCONDES, M. I.
700 1 $aMACHADO, F. S.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, L. G. R.
700 1 $aTOMICH, T. R.
700 1 $aRIBEIRO JUNIOR, G. O.
700 1 $aCHIZZOTTI, M. L.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, A. L.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, M. M.
700 1 $aMAURÍCIO, R. M.
700 1 $aCHAVES, A. V.
700 1 $aMcALLISTER, T. A.
773 $tAnimal Feed Science and Technology$gv. 216, p. 49-57, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 68 | |
| 3. |  | OLIVEIRA, A. S. de; MARTINS, E. de S. Zoneamento de agrominerais na Ecorregião do Planalto Central. In: ENCONTRO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA CERRADOS. Jovens talentos 2016: resumos. Planaltina, DF: Embrapa Cerrados, 2016. 99 p. p. 22 (Embrapa Cerrados. Documentos, 334). Comissão organizadora: SOUZA, K. W. de; FALEIRO, A. S. G.; SALGUES, A. L. M.; ALONSO, A. M.; CARVALHO, A. M. de; LOBATO, B. R.; CRUZ, C. V.; SOUSA, E. dos S.; PELEGRINELLI, F.; SOARES, J. P. G.; LIMA, J. E. F. W.; ARBUES, J. F. de O.;...| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
|   |
| 4. | | OLIVEIRA, A. S. de; GOMES, L. H. M.; GOLDMAN, M. H. S.; MALUF, M. P. Caracterização de genes MADS em acessos de Coffea. In: SIMPÓSIO DE PESQUISA DOS CAFÉS DO BRASIL, 5., 2007, Águas de Lindóia, SP. Anais... Brasília, DF: Embrapa Café, 2007.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Café. |
|  |
| 10. | | URBEN, A. F.; MENDES, M. A. S.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de. Microflora fúngica em videira procedente da França. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 29, supl., p. S122, ago. 2004. Edição dos Resumos do XXXVII Congresso Brasileiro de Fitopatologia, Gramado, RS, ago. 2004.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 12. | | FURLANI, G. F.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de; SANTOS, R. S. S. dos; BIZOTTO, L. A. Movimentos populacionais de Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura, 1931) (Diptera, Drosophilidae) entre agroecossistemas de mata de pinus e pomar de pequenos frutos. In: ENCONTRO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 14. ENCONTRO DE PÓS-GRADUANDOS DA EMBRAPA UVA E VINHO, 10., 2016, Bento Gonçalves. Resumos...Bento Gonçalves, RS: Embrapa uva e Vinho, 2016. p. 38. (Embrapa Uva e Vinho. Documentos, 99)| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| 14. | | GIRARDI-DEIRO, A. M.; SOBRAL, M.; DEBLE, L. P.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de; COLLARES, L. C. Levantamento da flora vascular na "Pedra Grande", Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 2002. 22 p. il. col. (Embrapa Pecuária Sul. Documentos, 48).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
| |
| 16. | | MENDES, P. D.; RODRIGUES JÚNIOR, A. J. G.; MENDES, M. A. S.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de. Fungos transmitidos por sementes de Brachiaria provenientes de Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul. In: ENCONTRO DO TALENTO ESTUDANTIL DA EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA, 9., 2004, Brasília, DF. Anais: resumos dos trabalhos. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, 2004. p. 163.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 17. | | COELHO, E. F.; COELHO FILHO, M. A.; MAGALHAES, A. F. de J.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de. Irrigação e fertirrigação na cultura de citros. In: SOUSA, V. F. de; MAROUELLI, W. A.; COELHO, E. F.; PINTO, J. M.; COELHO FILHO, M. A. (Ed.). Irrigação e fertirrigação em fruteiras e hortaliças. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2011. Cap. 14, p. 413-439.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| 18. | | OLIVEIRA, A. S. de; COELHO FILHO, M. A.; COELHO, E. F.; PAZ, V. P. da S. Irrigação em fruticultura. In: SANTOS-SEREJO, J. A. dos; DANTAS, J. L. L.; SAMPAIO, C. V.; COELHO, Y. da S. (Ed.). Fruticultura tropical: espécies regionais e exóticas. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2009. p. 45-58.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| 20. | | SANTOS, R. S. S. dos; BURRACK, H.; PERRITT, R.; BIZOTTO, L. de A.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de; FURLANI, G. F. Avaliação de atrativos para monitoramento de drosophila suzukii em pomar comercial de framboesa. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FRUTICULTURA, 24., 2016, São Luis. Fruticultura: fruteiras nativas e sustentabilidade. São Luis, MA: SBF, 2016. Resumo 1585| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 68 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
