|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
Data corrente: |
17/11/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
23/02/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
SOARES, D. dos S.; RAMOS, M. L. G.; MACIEL, G. A.; CARVALHO, A. M. de; SANTOS, D. C. R. dos; PAULA, A. M. de; SILVA, S. B.; SILVA, A. M. M.; MARCHAO, R. L. |
Afiliação: |
DAIANE DOS SANTOS SOARES, UNB; MARIA LUCRECIA GEROSA RAMOS, UNB; GIOVANA ALCANTARA MACIEL, CPAC; ARMINDA MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, CPAC; DIVINA CLÉIA RESENDE DOS SANTOS, UNB; ALESSANDRA MONTEIRO DE PAULA, UNB; STEFANY BRAZ SILVA, UNB; ANTÔNIO MARCOS MIRANDA SILVA, UNB; ROBELIO LEANDRO MARCHAO, CPAC. |
Título: |
Influência de diferentes sistemas agrícolas sob plantio direto na atividade microbiana do solo. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE FERTILIDADE DO SOLO E NUTRIÇÃO DE PLANTAS, 32.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA SOBRE MICORRIZAS, 16.; SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE MICROBIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 14.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE BIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 11., 2016, Goiânia. Rumo aos novos desafios: [anais]. Viçosa, MG: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 2016. FertBio 2016. |
Páginas: |
p. 1118. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Plantas de cobertura; Respiração basal; Sistema plantio direto. |
Thesagro: |
Cerrado; Solo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/150118/1/CPAC-6.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01074nam a2200265 a 4500 001 2056499 005 2017-02-23 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSOARES, D. dos S. 245 $aInfluência de diferentes sistemas agrícolas sob plantio direto na atividade microbiana do solo. 260 $aIn: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE FERTILIDADE DO SOLO E NUTRIÇÃO DE PLANTAS, 32.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA SOBRE MICORRIZAS, 16.; SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE MICROBIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 14.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE BIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 11., 2016, Goiânia. Rumo aos novos desafios: [anais]. Viçosa, MG: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 2016. FertBio 2016.$c2016 300 $ap. 1118. 650 $aCerrado 650 $aSolo 653 $aPlantas de cobertura 653 $aRespiração basal 653 $aSistema plantio direto 700 1 $aRAMOS, M. L. G. 700 1 $aMACIEL, G. A. 700 1 $aCARVALHO, A. M. de 700 1 $aSANTOS, D. C. R. dos 700 1 $aPAULA, A. M. de 700 1 $aSILVA, S. B. 700 1 $aSILVA, A. M. M. 700 1 $aMARCHAO, R. L.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
Data corrente: |
04/01/2023 |
Data da última atualização: |
14/07/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
NUNES, P. S. de O.; MEDEIROS, F. H. V.; OLIVEIRA, T. S. de; ZAGO, J. R. de A.; BETTIOL, W. |
Afiliação: |
PETERSON SYLVIO DE OLIVEIRA NUNES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; FLÁVIO HENRIQUE VASCONCELOS DE MEDEIROS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE LAVRAS; TIAGO SEBASTIÃO DE OLIVEIRA, CHR-HANSEN INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO; JAQUELINE R DE ALMEIDA ZAGO, CHR-HANSEN INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO; WAGNER BETTIOL, CNPMA. |
Título: |
Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis promote tomato growth. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, v. 54, n. 1, p. 397-406, 2022. |
ISSN: |
1678-4405 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-022-00874-3 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: Bacillus spp. are widely marketed and used in agricultural systems as antagonists to various phytopathogens, but it can also benefit the plant as plant growth promoters. Therefore, the longer presence of the bacterium in the rhizosphere would result in a prolonged growth-promoting benefit, but little is yet known about its persistence in the rhizosphere after seed coating. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the tomato growth promotion mediated by Bacillus licheniformis FMCH001 and Bacillus subtilis FMCH002 and the survival rate of these bacteria both in shoots and in the rhizosphere. The Bacillus strains used throughout this study were obtained from Quartzo® produced by Chr. Hansen. The application of a mixture of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis (Quartzo®) at concentrations 1 × 108, 1 × 109, and 1 × 1010 CFU mL-1, as well as the application of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis individually at concentration 1 × 108 CFU mL-1, increased fresh and dry masses of shoot and root system, volume of root system, and length of roots of tomato plants when compared to control. Both Bacillus strains produced IAA after 48 h of in vitro. Bacillus colonies obtained from plant sap were morphologically similar to colonies of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis strains and were detected in inoculated on plants and not detected in control ones. A similar pattern was obtained through DNA-based detection (qPCR). Therefore, B. subtilis and B. licheniformis were able to produce auxin, promote tomato growth, and colonize and persist in the rhizosphere. MenosAbstract: Bacillus spp. are widely marketed and used in agricultural systems as antagonists to various phytopathogens, but it can also benefit the plant as plant growth promoters. Therefore, the longer presence of the bacterium in the rhizosphere would result in a prolonged growth-promoting benefit, but little is yet known about its persistence in the rhizosphere after seed coating. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the tomato growth promotion mediated by Bacillus licheniformis FMCH001 and Bacillus subtilis FMCH002 and the survival rate of these bacteria both in shoots and in the rhizosphere. The Bacillus strains used throughout this study were obtained from Quartzo® produced by Chr. Hansen. The application of a mixture of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis (Quartzo®) at concentrations 1 × 108, 1 × 109, and 1 × 1010 CFU mL-1, as well as the application of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis individually at concentration 1 × 108 CFU mL-1, increased fresh and dry masses of shoot and root system, volume of root system, and length of roots of tomato plants when compared to control. Both Bacillus strains produced IAA after 48 h of in vitro. Bacillus colonies obtained from plant sap were morphologically similar to colonies of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis strains and were detected in inoculated on plants and not detected in control ones. A similar pattern was obtained through DNA-based detection (qPCR). Therefore, B. subtilis and B. licheniformis were able to produce aux... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Bacilo; Estimulante de Crescimento Vegetal; Tomate. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Bacillus licheniformis; Bacillus subtilis; Growth promotion; Growth regulators; Tomatoes. |
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
Marc: |
LEADER 02444naa a2200289 a 4500 001 2150615 005 2023-07-14 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1678-4405 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-022-00874-3$2DOI 100 1 $aNUNES, P. S. de O. 245 $aBacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis promote tomato growth.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $aAbstract: Bacillus spp. are widely marketed and used in agricultural systems as antagonists to various phytopathogens, but it can also benefit the plant as plant growth promoters. Therefore, the longer presence of the bacterium in the rhizosphere would result in a prolonged growth-promoting benefit, but little is yet known about its persistence in the rhizosphere after seed coating. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the tomato growth promotion mediated by Bacillus licheniformis FMCH001 and Bacillus subtilis FMCH002 and the survival rate of these bacteria both in shoots and in the rhizosphere. The Bacillus strains used throughout this study were obtained from Quartzo® produced by Chr. Hansen. The application of a mixture of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis (Quartzo®) at concentrations 1 × 108, 1 × 109, and 1 × 1010 CFU mL-1, as well as the application of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis individually at concentration 1 × 108 CFU mL-1, increased fresh and dry masses of shoot and root system, volume of root system, and length of roots of tomato plants when compared to control. Both Bacillus strains produced IAA after 48 h of in vitro. Bacillus colonies obtained from plant sap were morphologically similar to colonies of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis strains and were detected in inoculated on plants and not detected in control ones. A similar pattern was obtained through DNA-based detection (qPCR). Therefore, B. subtilis and B. licheniformis were able to produce auxin, promote tomato growth, and colonize and persist in the rhizosphere. 650 $aBacillus licheniformis 650 $aBacillus subtilis 650 $aGrowth promotion 650 $aGrowth regulators 650 $aTomatoes 650 $aBacilo 650 $aEstimulante de Crescimento Vegetal 650 $aTomate 700 1 $aMEDEIROS, F. H. V. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, T. S. de 700 1 $aZAGO, J. R. de A. 700 1 $aBETTIOL, W. 773 $tBrazilian Journal of Microbiology$gv. 54, n. 1, p. 397-406, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|