Data/hora: 04/06/2024 12:02:51

Biblioteca(s): 	Embrapa Solos.	
Data corrente: 	23/08/2016	
Data da última atualização: 	09/11/2021	
Autoria: 	CLEMENT, C. R.; DENEVAN, W. M.; HECKENBERGER, M. J.; JUNQUEIRA, A. B.; NEVES, E. G.; TEIXEIRA, W. G.; WOODS, W. I.	
Afiliação: 	CHARLES R. CLEMENT, INPA; WILLIAM M. DENEVAN, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN; MICHAEL J. HECKENBERGER, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; ANDRÉ BRAGA JUNQUEIRA, INPA; EDUARDO G. NEVES, USP; WENCESLAU GERALDES TEIXEIRA, CNPS; WILLIAM I. WOODS, UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS.	
Título: 	Response to comment by McMichael, Piperno and Bush.	
Ano de publicação: 	2015	
Fonte/Imprenta: 	Proceedings of the Royal Society B: biological sciences, v. 282, n. 1821, 20152459, Dez. 2015.	
DOI: 	https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2459	
Idioma: 	Inglês	
Conteúdo: 	We thank McMichael et al. for commenting on our recent review [1]. They focus on: our misinterpretation of their published data; use of data that is not pre-Conquest; and the extrapolative nature of our review. As they point out, we agree with them about heterogeneous landscape domestication across Amazonia, but we dis- agree with their conclusions about the extent to which forests were altered in western Amazonia and elsewhere [2,3]. As western Amazonia covers approxi- mately 2 000 000 km2, they are making a major statement. We consider their claim to be of an excessively 'extrapolative nature' given their data.	
Palavras-Chave: 	Fitólito.	
Thesagro: 	Carvão Vegetal.	
Thesaurus Nal: 	Amazonia.	
Categoria do assunto: 	P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra	
Registro original: 	Embrapa Solos (CNPS)	
Exemplares: 	CNPS - (19320-1) - UPC - AP - DD -  -  - 2016.00217 - DIS