| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/11/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/11/2002 |
|
Autoria: |
CORDEIRO, M. C. R.; BARRUETO CID, L. P.; PINTO, A. C. de Q.; ANDRADE, S. R. M. VARGAS, V. H. R. |
|
Título: |
Preliminary assays for establishment of an in vitro micropropagation protocol of mango cultivated in brazilian savannah. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2002 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, 7., 2002, Recife. Program and abstracts. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindustria Tropical; Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados; Cruz das Almas: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Teresina: Embrapa Meio Norte; Petrolina: Embrapa Semi-Arido; Recife: IPA, 2002. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 342. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Agroindustria Tropical. Documentos, 46). |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Thesagro: |
Cerrado; Manga; Mangifera Indica; Micropropagação. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00934naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1565607
005 2002-11-04
008 2002 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCORDEIRO, M. C. R.
245 $aPreliminary assays for establishment of an in vitro micropropagation protocol of mango cultivated in brazilian savannah.
260 $c2002
300 $ap. 342.
490 $a(Embrapa Agroindustria Tropical. Documentos, 46).
650 $aCerrado
650 $aManga
650 $aMangifera Indica
650 $aMicropropagação
700 1 $aBARRUETO CID, L. P.
700 1 $aPINTO, A. C. de Q.
700 1 $aANDRADE, S. R. M. VARGAS, V. H. R.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, 7., 2002, Recife. Program and abstracts. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindustria Tropical; Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados; Cruz das Almas: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Teresina: Embrapa Meio Norte; Petrolina: Embrapa Semi-Arido; Recife: IPA, 2002.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/09/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/09/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
WIESE, L.; WOLLENBERG, E.; ALCÁNTARA-SHIVAPATHAMC; RICHARDS, M.; SHELTON, S.; HÖNLE, S. E.; HEIDECKE, C.; MADARI, B. E.; CHENU, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
LIESL WIESE, INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND POLICY CONSULTANT, South Africa; EVA WOLLENBERG, CGIAR; VIRIDIANA ALCÁNTARA-SHIVAPATHAMC, FEDERAL OFFICE FOR AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, Germany; MERYL RICHARDS, CERES; SADIE SHELTON, CGIAR; SUSANNA ESTHER HÖNLE, THÜNEN INSTITUTE; CLAUDIA HEIDECKE, THÜNEN INSTITUTE; BEATA EMOKE MADARI, CNPAF; CLAIRE CHENU, AgroParis Tech. |
|
Título: |
Countries' commitments to soil organic carbon in nationally determined contributions. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Climate Policy, 2021. |
|
ISSN: |
1469-3062 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1969883 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Soil carbon is the major active pool of terrestrial carbon, and as such, soil organic carbon (SOC) targets, policies and measures will be pivotal to achieving global climate targets. SOC sequestration may reduce the net annual greenhouse gas emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use by between 3% and 71%, while simultaneously supporting various ecosystem services. Accurate SOC accounting and monitoring, however, is constrained by various technical challenges related to indicators, rates of SOC change, measuring the impact of management practices on SOC, and the long-term persistence of sequestered SOC. We assessed countries' pledges to the Paris Agreement for SOC in agriculture to better understand the level, transparency, and specificity of commitments. Reviewing 184 countries' initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), we considered whether SOC was included, what was pledged, the level of ambition promised and the specificity of mitigation targets. Twenty-eight countries referred to SOC in their NDCs, citing quantified or unquantified mitigation targets, national policies or programs, and actions and measures to be implemented in agricultural lands (14), peatlands (6) or wetlands (14). Countries' reasons for not including SOC in NDCs included the need to prioritize goals of sustainable development and food security above climate mitigation, a lack of incentives for farmers to improve management practices, and the difficulty of accurately monitoring changes in SOC. Including SOC targets in NDCs can improve NDCs' comprehensiveness and transparency to track and compare policy progress across NDCs; it can also leverage SOC-related climate finance, technical support, and capacity building. MenosSoil carbon is the major active pool of terrestrial carbon, and as such, soil organic carbon (SOC) targets, policies and measures will be pivotal to achieving global climate targets. SOC sequestration may reduce the net annual greenhouse gas emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use by between 3% and 71%, while simultaneously supporting various ecosystem services. Accurate SOC accounting and monitoring, however, is constrained by various technical challenges related to indicators, rates of SOC change, measuring the impact of management practices on SOC, and the long-term persistence of sequestered SOC. We assessed countries' pledges to the Paris Agreement for SOC in agriculture to better understand the level, transparency, and specificity of commitments. Reviewing 184 countries' initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), we considered whether SOC was included, what was pledged, the level of ambition promised and the specificity of mitigation targets. Twenty-eight countries referred to SOC in their NDCs, citing quantified or unquantified mitigation targets, national policies or programs, and actions and measures to be implemented in agricultural lands (14), peatlands (6) or wetlands (14). Countries' reasons for not including SOC in NDCs included the need to prioritize goals of sustainable development and food security above climate mitigation, a lack of incentives for farmers to improve management practices, and the difficulty of accurately monitoring c... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Paris agreement; Policy. |
|
Thesagro: |
Carbono; Mudança Climática; Solo. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agriculture; Climate change; National Environmental Policy Act; Soil organic carbon. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02704naa a2200349 a 4500
001 2134919
005 2021-09-30
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1469-3062
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1969883$2DOI
100 1 $aWIESE, L.
245 $aCountries' commitments to soil organic carbon in nationally determined contributions.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aSoil carbon is the major active pool of terrestrial carbon, and as such, soil organic carbon (SOC) targets, policies and measures will be pivotal to achieving global climate targets. SOC sequestration may reduce the net annual greenhouse gas emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use by between 3% and 71%, while simultaneously supporting various ecosystem services. Accurate SOC accounting and monitoring, however, is constrained by various technical challenges related to indicators, rates of SOC change, measuring the impact of management practices on SOC, and the long-term persistence of sequestered SOC. We assessed countries' pledges to the Paris Agreement for SOC in agriculture to better understand the level, transparency, and specificity of commitments. Reviewing 184 countries' initial Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), we considered whether SOC was included, what was pledged, the level of ambition promised and the specificity of mitigation targets. Twenty-eight countries referred to SOC in their NDCs, citing quantified or unquantified mitigation targets, national policies or programs, and actions and measures to be implemented in agricultural lands (14), peatlands (6) or wetlands (14). Countries' reasons for not including SOC in NDCs included the need to prioritize goals of sustainable development and food security above climate mitigation, a lack of incentives for farmers to improve management practices, and the difficulty of accurately monitoring changes in SOC. Including SOC targets in NDCs can improve NDCs' comprehensiveness and transparency to track and compare policy progress across NDCs; it can also leverage SOC-related climate finance, technical support, and capacity building.
650 $aAgriculture
650 $aClimate change
650 $aNational Environmental Policy Act
650 $aSoil organic carbon
650 $aCarbono
650 $aMudança Climática
650 $aSolo
653 $aParis agreement
653 $aPolicy
700 1 $aWOLLENBERG, E.
700 1 $aALCÁNTARA-SHIVAPATHAMC
700 1 $aRICHARDS, M.
700 1 $aSHELTON, S.
700 1 $aHÖNLE, S. E.
700 1 $aHEIDECKE, C.
700 1 $aMADARI, B. E.
700 1 $aCHENU, C.
773 $tClimate Policy, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
