|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
Data corrente: |
25/10/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
24/01/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
PEIXOTO, D. S.; SILVA, B. M.; SILVA, S. H. G.; KARLEN, D. L.; MOREIRA, S. G.; SILVA, A. A. P. da; RESENDE, A. V. de; NORTON, L. D.; CURI, N. |
Afiliação: |
Devison Souza Peixoto, Universidade Federal de Lavras; Bruno Montoani Silva, Universidade Federal de Lavras; Sérgio Henrique Godinho Silva, Universidade Federal de Lavras; Douglas L. Karlen, USDA; Silvino Guimarães Moreira, Universidade Federal de Lavras; Alessandro Alvarenga Pereira da Silva, Universidade Federal de Lavas; ALVARO VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPMS; Lloyd Darrell Norton, Purdue University; Nilton Curi, Universidade Federal de Lavras. |
Título: |
Diagnosing, ameliorating, and monitoring soil compaction in no-till brazilian soils. |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, v. 2, article 180035, 2019. |
DOI: |
10.2134/age2018.09.0035 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Soil compaction can significantly reduce crop yield. Our objective was to identify the most sensitive soil physical property and process indicators related to crop yield using a Random Forest algorithm (RFA). This machine-learning, decision-making tool was used with field-scale data from five soil management treatments designed to ameliorate compaction in no-tillage (NT) fields. The treatments were: T1, NT for 10 yr (control); T2, NT with surface application of 3.6 Mg ha-1 of agricultural gypsum; T3, NT with subsoiling plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of highly reactive limestone applied to a depth of 0.60 m; T4, NT planting following chisel plowing at a depth of 0.26 m; and T5, NT with subsoiling to a depth of 0.60 m plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of surface-applied, highly reactive limestone. Fifteen soil physical properties and processes related to growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were measured. Mechanical intervention, specifically subsoiling, improved soil physical properties and increased soybean yield cultivated following occasional tillage. The RFA ranked penetration resistance (PR), air capacity, macroporosity, relative field capacity, and the Dexter-S index as the most sensitive soil physical indicators affecting soybean yield. Those indicators were also sensitive to changes in soil structure due to subsoiling. We conclude that the RFA was an effective tool for screening indicators and that those chosen can be effective for monitoring soil compaction and its effect on soybean yield. Penetration resistance may be used to guide on-farm decision-making regarding when and how NT soil compaction should be addressed. MenosSoil compaction can significantly reduce crop yield. Our objective was to identify the most sensitive soil physical property and process indicators related to crop yield using a Random Forest algorithm (RFA). This machine-learning, decision-making tool was used with field-scale data from five soil management treatments designed to ameliorate compaction in no-tillage (NT) fields. The treatments were: T1, NT for 10 yr (control); T2, NT with surface application of 3.6 Mg ha-1 of agricultural gypsum; T3, NT with subsoiling plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of highly reactive limestone applied to a depth of 0.60 m; T4, NT planting following chisel plowing at a depth of 0.26 m; and T5, NT with subsoiling to a depth of 0.60 m plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of surface-applied, highly reactive limestone. Fifteen soil physical properties and processes related to growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were measured. Mechanical intervention, specifically subsoiling, improved soil physical properties and increased soybean yield cultivated following occasional tillage. The RFA ranked penetration resistance (PR), air capacity, macroporosity, relative field capacity, and the Dexter-S index as the most sensitive soil physical indicators affecting soybean yield. Those indicators were also sensitive to changes in soil structure due to subsoiling. We conclude that the RFA was an effective tool for screening indicators and that those chosen can be effective for monitoring soil compaction and its effect on soyb... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Random Forest. |
Thesagro: |
Compactação do Solo; Física do Solo; Plantio Direto; Rendimento. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/203695/1/Diagnosing-Ameliorating.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02488naa a2200289 a 4500 001 2113481 005 2020-01-24 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2134/age2018.09.0035$2DOI 100 1 $aPEIXOTO, D. S. 245 $aDiagnosing, ameliorating, and monitoring soil compaction in no-till brazilian soils.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 520 $aSoil compaction can significantly reduce crop yield. Our objective was to identify the most sensitive soil physical property and process indicators related to crop yield using a Random Forest algorithm (RFA). This machine-learning, decision-making tool was used with field-scale data from five soil management treatments designed to ameliorate compaction in no-tillage (NT) fields. The treatments were: T1, NT for 10 yr (control); T2, NT with surface application of 3.6 Mg ha-1 of agricultural gypsum; T3, NT with subsoiling plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of highly reactive limestone applied to a depth of 0.60 m; T4, NT planting following chisel plowing at a depth of 0.26 m; and T5, NT with subsoiling to a depth of 0.60 m plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of surface-applied, highly reactive limestone. Fifteen soil physical properties and processes related to growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were measured. Mechanical intervention, specifically subsoiling, improved soil physical properties and increased soybean yield cultivated following occasional tillage. The RFA ranked penetration resistance (PR), air capacity, macroporosity, relative field capacity, and the Dexter-S index as the most sensitive soil physical indicators affecting soybean yield. Those indicators were also sensitive to changes in soil structure due to subsoiling. We conclude that the RFA was an effective tool for screening indicators and that those chosen can be effective for monitoring soil compaction and its effect on soybean yield. Penetration resistance may be used to guide on-farm decision-making regarding when and how NT soil compaction should be addressed. 650 $aCompactação do Solo 650 $aFísica do Solo 650 $aPlantio Direto 650 $aRendimento 653 $aRandom Forest 700 1 $aSILVA, B. M. 700 1 $aSILVA, S. H. G. 700 1 $aKARLEN, D. L. 700 1 $aMOREIRA, S. G. 700 1 $aSILVA, A. A. P. da 700 1 $aRESENDE, A. V. de 700 1 $aNORTON, L. D. 700 1 $aCURI, N. 773 $tAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment$gv. 2, article 180035, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
Data corrente: |
03/09/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
15/12/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Autoria: |
JULIANO, R. S.; OLIVEIRA, M. D. de; HOOGESTEIJN, R.; VIANA, D.; SANTOS, S. A. |
Afiliação: |
RAQUEL SOARES JULIANO, CPAP; MARCIA DIVINA DE OLIVEIRA, CPAP; RAFAEL HOOGESTEIJN, ONG Panthera Brasil; DIEGO VIANA; SANDRA APARECIDA SANTOS, CPAP. |
Título: |
Manejo do rebanho. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: GUIA de melhores práticas pecuárias da planície pantaneira. Brasília, DF : Fundo Mundial Para a Natureza, 2021. |
Páginas: |
p. 110-175. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Neste capítulo você irá encontrar práticas de manejo de bovinos que buscam tirar da propriedade o potencial produtivo, também abordará práticas de manejo que visem a minimizar o sofrimento animal, aliando o manejo ao bem-estar animal. A interdisciplinaridade presente no conteúdo abordado é resultado de uma análise das atividades desenvolvidas no sistema de produção, avaliando desde a disposição física de infraestruturas, até quais resultados que devem ser registrados. |
Thesagro: |
Bovinocultura; Manejo; Pecuária; Produção Animal. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Animal manure management; Animal production; Beef cattle; Livestock. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/225730/1/Manejo-do-rebanho-2021.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01266naa a2200277 a 4500 001 2134035 005 2021-12-15 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aJULIANO, R. S. 245 $aManejo do rebanho.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 300 $ap. 110-175. 520 $aNeste capítulo você irá encontrar práticas de manejo de bovinos que buscam tirar da propriedade o potencial produtivo, também abordará práticas de manejo que visem a minimizar o sofrimento animal, aliando o manejo ao bem-estar animal. A interdisciplinaridade presente no conteúdo abordado é resultado de uma análise das atividades desenvolvidas no sistema de produção, avaliando desde a disposição física de infraestruturas, até quais resultados que devem ser registrados. 650 $aAnimal manure management 650 $aAnimal production 650 $aBeef cattle 650 $aLivestock 650 $aBovinocultura 650 $aManejo 650 $aPecuária 650 $aProdução Animal 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. D. de 700 1 $aHOOGESTEIJN, R. 700 1 $aVIANA, D. 700 1 $aSANTOS, S. A. 773 $tIn: GUIA de melhores práticas pecuárias da planície pantaneira. Brasília, DF : Fundo Mundial Para a Natureza, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|