| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/08/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/08/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, R. F. B. da; BATISTELLA, M.; MORAN, E.; CELIDONIO, O. L. de M.; MILLINGTON, J. D. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAMON FELIPE BICUDO DA SILVA, Unicamp; MATEUS BATISTELLA, CNPTIA, Unicamp; EMILIO MORAN, Michigan State University; OTÁVIO LEMOS DE MELO CELIDONIO, SENAR-MT; JAMES D. A. MILLINGTON, King’s College London. |
|
Título: |
The soybean trap: challenges and risks for Brazilian producers. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 4, p. 1-13, Feb. 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00012 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Article 12. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Since the 1970s, Brazilian soybean production has grown rapidly, driven by increasingnational and international demand and rising prices. Consequently, soybean productionhas come to be perceived as an attractive opportunity, with the number of farmsproducing soybean across the country reaching around 240,000 in 2017. However,producers can become trapped by dependencies on moneylenders, traders and inputsupply companies, facing so-called? agricultural treadmills?. In this study we undertookinterviews with individual soybean producers and representatives of trader companies,producers? associations, the processing industry, government and civil society, and usedthese data to analyze rural production operations related to the soybean supply chainand to interpret how agricultural treadmills persist in this sector. Based on literaturereview and fieldwork interviews, we found that producers have been able to add valueto their products, but some strategies they use to cope with production costs lead theminto high-risk situations. Our findings show that, sectoral(e.g., producers? associations)and collective actions (e.g., farmers? buying groups) are auseful strategy for producersto gain influence and bargaining power against transnational companies and inputsuppliers compared to acting as an individual within the soybean supply chain. Producerswere emphatic that the current soybean business is now much more than just farmingactivities, and that education and training are highly valuable and important strategies tokeep producers in the soybean business and out of traps. These findings are importantgiven the neoliberal context in which individual producersfind themselves and whichpresents challenges that alone they can do little to change.Policies that enable individualproducers to make environmentally- and financially-sound agricultural decisions are vitalto ensure a sustainable soybean system that does not trap producers in endless cyclesof debt and investment MenosSince the 1970s, Brazilian soybean production has grown rapidly, driven by increasingnational and international demand and rising prices. Consequently, soybean productionhas come to be perceived as an attractive opportunity, with the number of farmsproducing soybean across the country reaching around 240,000 in 2017. However,producers can become trapped by dependencies on moneylenders, traders and inputsupply companies, facing so-called? agricultural treadmills?. In this study we undertookinterviews with individual soybean producers and representatives of trader companies,producers? associations, the processing industry, government and civil society, and usedthese data to analyze rural production operations related to the soybean supply chainand to interpret how agricultural treadmills persist in this sector. Based on literaturereview and fieldwork interviews, we found that producers have been able to add valueto their products, but some strategies they use to cope with production costs lead theminto high-risk situations. Our findings show that, sectoral(e.g., producers? associations)and collective actions (e.g., farmers? buying groups) are auseful strategy for producersto gain influence and bargaining power against transnational companies and inputsuppliers compared to acting as an individual within the soybean supply chain. Producerswere emphatic that the current soybean business is now much more than just farmingactivities, and that education and training are highly valua... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural inputs; Agricultural risks; Agricultural treadmill; Food commodity; Profit margins; Riscos agrícolas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02821naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2124350
005 2020-08-13
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00012$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVA, R. F. B. da
245 $aThe soybean trap$bchallenges and risks for Brazilian producers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle 12.
520 $aSince the 1970s, Brazilian soybean production has grown rapidly, driven by increasingnational and international demand and rising prices. Consequently, soybean productionhas come to be perceived as an attractive opportunity, with the number of farmsproducing soybean across the country reaching around 240,000 in 2017. However,producers can become trapped by dependencies on moneylenders, traders and inputsupply companies, facing so-called? agricultural treadmills?. In this study we undertookinterviews with individual soybean producers and representatives of trader companies,producers? associations, the processing industry, government and civil society, and usedthese data to analyze rural production operations related to the soybean supply chainand to interpret how agricultural treadmills persist in this sector. Based on literaturereview and fieldwork interviews, we found that producers have been able to add valueto their products, but some strategies they use to cope with production costs lead theminto high-risk situations. Our findings show that, sectoral(e.g., producers? associations)and collective actions (e.g., farmers? buying groups) are auseful strategy for producersto gain influence and bargaining power against transnational companies and inputsuppliers compared to acting as an individual within the soybean supply chain. Producerswere emphatic that the current soybean business is now much more than just farmingactivities, and that education and training are highly valuable and important strategies tokeep producers in the soybean business and out of traps. These findings are importantgiven the neoliberal context in which individual producersfind themselves and whichpresents challenges that alone they can do little to change.Policies that enable individualproducers to make environmentally- and financially-sound agricultural decisions are vitalto ensure a sustainable soybean system that does not trap producers in endless cyclesof debt and investment
650 $aAgricultura
653 $aAgricultural inputs
653 $aAgricultural risks
653 $aAgricultural treadmill
653 $aFood commodity
653 $aProfit margins
653 $aRiscos agrícolas
700 1 $aBATISTELLA, M.
700 1 $aMORAN, E.
700 1 $aCELIDONIO, O. L. de M.
700 1 $aMILLINGTON, J. D. A.
773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems$gv. 4, p. 1-13, Feb. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/02/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/02/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
C - 0 |
|
Autoria: |
PILLA, T. P.; GALON, L.; BRANDLER, DAIANI.; BIANCHESE, F.; TONIN, R. J.; TONI, J. R.; FORTE, C. T.; VARGAS, L. |
|
Afiliação: |
THALITA PEDROZO PILLA, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim ZIP CODE: 99700 000, Erechim, Rio Grande do Su l, Brazil; LEANDRO GALON, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; DAIANI BRANDLER, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; FELIPE BIANCHESE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; RODRIGO JOSÉ TONIN, Dept. of Agronomy , The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; JOSIEL RICARDO TONI, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira S ul UFFS, Campus Erechim; CESAR TIAGO FORTE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; LEANDRO VARGAS, CNPT. |
|
Título: |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal Of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, p. 721-736, 2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply maturation herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.herbicides to canola is in the G4 season. MenosThe use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply matu... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Anticipation of harvest; Brassica napus L var oleifera. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Seed quality. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/220995/1/Pilla-2020-721.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02314naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2129849
005 2021-02-08
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPILLA, T. P.
245 $aPhysical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThe use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply maturation herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.
650 $aSeed quality
653 $aAnticipation of harvest
653 $aBrassica napus L var oleifera
700 1 $aGALON, L.
700 1 $aBRANDLER, DAIANI.
700 1 $aBIANCHESE, F.
700 1 $aTONIN, R. J.
700 1 $aTONI, J. R.
700 1 $aFORTE, C. T.
700 1 $aVARGAS, L.
773 $tJournal Of Agricultural Studies$gv. 8, p. 721-736, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
