| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos; Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/11/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
FEDDERN, V.; OLIVEIRA, K. P. V. de; GRESSLER, V.; FOGACA, F. H. dos S.; LOPES, G. P. de FARIA; RODRIGUES, C. A. V.; MARQUES, D. M. C.; SANJUAN-ALBERTE, P. |
|
Afiliação: |
VIVIAN FEDDERN, CNPSA; KARLA POLLYANNA VIEIRA DE OLIVEIRA; VANESSA GRESSLER, CNPSA; FABIOLA HELENA DOS SANTOS FOGACA, CTAA; GISELLE P. DE FARIA LOPES, Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira; CARLOS A. V. RODRIGUES, Universidade de Lisboa; DIANA M. C. MARQUES, Universidade de Lisboa; PAOLA SANJUAN-ALBERTE, Universidade de Lisboa. |
|
Título: |
Cultivated poultry and seafood: opportunities and future challenges. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
FRASER, E. D. G.; KAPLAN, D. L.; NEWMAN, L; YADA, R. Y. Cellular agriculture: technology, society, sustainability and science. London: Elsevier, 2023. p. 267-292. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Características sensoriais; Cell isolation and cultivation; Células fibro adipogênica progenitoras; Células satélite musculares; Células tronco; Consumer perception; Cultivated chicken; Cultivated seafood; Cultured chicken; Frango cultivado; Frutos do mar cultivados; Isolamento e cultivo de células; Materiais de estrutura; Materiais de suporte; Muscle satellite cells; Percepção do consumidor; Scaffolding materials; Sensory attributes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Ave Domestica; Desenvolvimento Sustentável. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Stem cells. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01526naa a2200445 a 4500
001 2158889
005 2023-12-20
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFEDDERN, V.
245 $aCultivated poultry and seafood$bopportunities and future challenges.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
650 $aStem cells
650 $aAve Domestica
650 $aDesenvolvimento Sustentável
653 $aCaracterísticas sensoriais
653 $aCell isolation and cultivation
653 $aCélulas fibro adipogênica progenitoras
653 $aCélulas satélite musculares
653 $aCélulas tronco
653 $aConsumer perception
653 $aCultivated chicken
653 $aCultivated seafood
653 $aCultured chicken
653 $aFrango cultivado
653 $aFrutos do mar cultivados
653 $aIsolamento e cultivo de células
653 $aMateriais de estrutura
653 $aMateriais de suporte
653 $aMuscle satellite cells
653 $aPercepção do consumidor
653 $aScaffolding materials
653 $aSensory attributes
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, K. P. V. de
700 1 $aGRESSLER, V.
700 1 $aFOGACA, F. H. dos S.
700 1 $aLOPES, G. P. de FARIA
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, C. A. V.
700 1 $aMARQUES, D. M. C.
700 1 $aSANJUAN-ALBERTE, P.
773 $tFRASER, E. D. G.; KAPLAN, D. L.; NEWMAN, L; YADA, R. Y. Cellular agriculture: technology, society, sustainability and science. London: Elsevier, 2023. p. 267-292.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/04/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/04/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
RACHID, C. T. C. C.; BALIEIRO, F. de C.; PEIXOTO, R. S.; FONSECA, E. S.; JESUS, H. E.; NOVOTNY, E. H.; CHAER, G. M.; SANTOS, F. M.; TIEDJE, J. M.; ROSADO, A. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
CAIO TAVORA RACHID COELHO DA COSTA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; FABIANO DE CARVALHO BALIEIRO, CNPS; RAQUEL SILVA PEIXOTO, KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; EDUARDO S. FONSECA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; HUGO E. JESUS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; ETELVINO HENRIQUE NOVOTNY, CNPS; GUILHERME MONTANDON CHAER, CNPAB; FELIPE M. SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; JAMES M. TIEDJE, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; ALEXANDRE S. ROSADO, KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. |
|
Título: |
Mycobiome structure does not affect field litter decomposition in Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Microbiology, v. 14, 1106422, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1106422 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Mixed tree plantations have been studied because of their potential to improve biomass production, ecosystem diversity, and soil quality. One example is a mixture of Eucalyptus and Acacia trees, which is a promising strategy to improve microbial diversity and nutrient cycling in soil. We examined how a mixture of these species may influence the biochemical attributes and fungal community associated with leaf litter, and the effects on litter decomposition. We studied the litter from pure and mixed plantations, evaluating the effects of plant material and incubation site on the mycobiome and decomposition rate using litterbags incubated in situ. Our central hypothesis was litter fungal community would change according to incubation site, and it would interfere in litter decomposition rate. Both the plant material and the incubation locale significantly affected the litter decomposition. The origin of the litter was the main modulator of the mycobiome, with distinct communities from one plant species to another. The community changed with the incubation time but the incubation site did not influence the mycobiome community. Our data showed that litter and soil did not share the main elements of the community. Contrary to our hypothesis, the microbial community structure and diversity lacked any association with the decomposition rate. The differences in the decomposition pattern are explained basically as a function of the exchange of nitrogen compounds between the litter. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fungos decompositores de lixo; Litter decomposing fungi; Litter decomposition; Micobioma; Mixed plantation; Mycobiome; Plantação Mista. |
|
Thesagro: |
Decomposição. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Acacia mangium; Eucalyptus. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1152925/1/Mycobiome-structure-does-not-affect-field-litter-decomposition-2023.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02568naa a2200361 a 4500
001 2152925
005 2023-04-04
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1106422$2DOI
100 1 $aRACHID, C. T. C. C.
245 $aMycobiome structure does not affect field litter decomposition in Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aMixed tree plantations have been studied because of their potential to improve biomass production, ecosystem diversity, and soil quality. One example is a mixture of Eucalyptus and Acacia trees, which is a promising strategy to improve microbial diversity and nutrient cycling in soil. We examined how a mixture of these species may influence the biochemical attributes and fungal community associated with leaf litter, and the effects on litter decomposition. We studied the litter from pure and mixed plantations, evaluating the effects of plant material and incubation site on the mycobiome and decomposition rate using litterbags incubated in situ. Our central hypothesis was litter fungal community would change according to incubation site, and it would interfere in litter decomposition rate. Both the plant material and the incubation locale significantly affected the litter decomposition. The origin of the litter was the main modulator of the mycobiome, with distinct communities from one plant species to another. The community changed with the incubation time but the incubation site did not influence the mycobiome community. Our data showed that litter and soil did not share the main elements of the community. Contrary to our hypothesis, the microbial community structure and diversity lacked any association with the decomposition rate. The differences in the decomposition pattern are explained basically as a function of the exchange of nitrogen compounds between the litter.
650 $aAcacia mangium
650 $aEucalyptus
650 $aDecomposição
653 $aFungos decompositores de lixo
653 $aLitter decomposing fungi
653 $aLitter decomposition
653 $aMicobioma
653 $aMixed plantation
653 $aMycobiome
653 $aPlantação Mista
700 1 $aBALIEIRO, F. de C.
700 1 $aPEIXOTO, R. S.
700 1 $aFONSECA, E. S.
700 1 $aJESUS, H. E.
700 1 $aNOVOTNY, E. H.
700 1 $aCHAER, G. M.
700 1 $aSANTOS, F. M.
700 1 $aTIEDJE, J. M.
700 1 $aROSADO, A. S.
773 $tFrontiers in Microbiology$gv. 14, 1106422, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
