|
|
![](/consulta/web/img/deny.png) | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
18/04/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
11/07/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
LAVELLE, P.; MATHIEU, J.; SPAIN. A.; BROWN, G. G.; FRAGOSO, C.; LAPIED, E.; AQUINO, A. de; BAROIS, I.; BARRIOS, E.; BARROS, M. E.; BEDANO, J. C.; BLANCHART, E.; CAULFIELD, M.; CHAGUEZA, Y.; DAI, J.; DECAËNS, T.; DOMINGUEZ, A.; DOMINGUEZ, Y.; FEIJOO, A.; FOLGARAIT, P.; FONTE, S. J.; GOROSITO, N.; HUERTA, E.; JIMENEZ, J. J.; KELLY, C.; LORANGER, G.; MARCHAO, R. L.; MARICHAL, R.; PRAXEDES, C.; RODRIGUEZ, L.; ROUSSEAU, G.; ROUSSEAU, L.; RUIZ, N.; SANABRIA, C.; SUAREZ, J. C.; TONDOH, J. E.; VALENÇA, A. de; VANEK, S. J.; VASQUEZ, J.; VELASQUEZ, E.; WEBSTER, E.; ZHANG, C. |
Afiliação: |
PATRICK LAVELLE, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; JÉRÔME MATHIEU, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; ALISTER SPAIN; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; CARLOS FRAGOSO, Red Biodiversidad y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecologia A.C., Xalapa; EMMANUEL LAPIED, Taxonomia Biodiversity Fund.; ADRIANA DE AQUINO; ISABELLE BAROIS, Red Ecología Funcional, Instituto de Ecologia A.C., Xalapa; EDMUNDO BARRIOS, FAO; MARIA ELEUSA BARROS, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; JOSÉ CAMILO BEDANO, Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto; ERIC BLANCHART, Eco& Sols, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAe, Institut Agro; MARK CAULFIELD, Eco& Sols, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAe, Institut Agro; Wageningen University; YAMILETH CHAGUEZA, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; JUN DAI, South China Agricultural University; THIBAUD DECAËNS, Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive; ANAHI DOMINGUEZ, Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto; YAMILETH DOMINGUEZ, Universidad del Atlántico; ALEXANDER FEIJOO, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira; PATRICIA FOLGARAIT, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; STEVEN J. FONTE, Colorado State University; NORMA GOROSITO, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; ESPERANZA HUERTA, HUERTA; Wageningen University and Research; JUAN JOSE JIMENEZ, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology; COURTLAND KELLY, Colorado State University; GLADYS LORANGER, Université des Antilles; ROBELIO LEANDRO MARCHAO, CPAC; RAPHAEL MARICHAL, CIRAD; CATARINA PRAXEDES, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi; LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ, Universidad de la Amazonia; GUILLAUME ROUSSEAU, Maranhão State University; LAURENT ROUSSEAU, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; NURIA RUIZ, French National Research Agency; CATALINA SANABRIA, UNIVALLE; JUAN CARLOS SUAREZ, Universidad de la Amazonia; JERÔME EBAGNERIN TONDOH, Université Nagui Abrogoua; ANNE DE VALENÇA, Wageningen University; STEVEN J. VANEK, Colorado State University; JOEL VASQUEZ, Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana; Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana; ELENA VELASQUEZ, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; EMILY WEBSTER, University of California; CHI ZHANG, South China Agricultural University. |
Título: |
Soil macroinvertebrate communities: a world-wide assessment. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Global Ecology and Biogeography, v. 31, n. 7, p. 1261-1276, 2022. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13492 |
Idioma: |
Inglês Português |
Conteúdo: |
AIM. Macroinvertebrates comprise a highly diverse set of taxa with great potential as indicators of soil quality. Communities were sampled at 3,694 sites distributed world-wide. We aimed to analyse the patterns of abundance, composition and network characteristics and their relationships to latitude, mean annual temperature and rainfall, land cover, soil texture and agricultural practices.
LOCATION. Sites are distributed in 41 countries, ranging from 55° S to 57° N latitude, from 0 to 4,000 m in elevation, with annual rainfall ranging from 500 to >3,000 mm and mean temperatures of 5?32°C.
TIME PERIOD. 1980-2018.
MAJOR TAXA STUDIED.
All soil macroinvertebrates: Haplotaxida; Coleoptera; Formicidae; Arachnida; Chilopoda; Diplopoda; Diptera; Isoptera; Isopoda; Homoptera; Hemiptera; Gastropoda; Blattaria; Orthoptera; Lepidoptera; Dermaptera; and ?others?.
METHODS.
Standard ISO 23611-5 sampling protocol was applied at all sites. Data treatment used a set of multivariate analyses, principal components analysis (PCA) on macrofauna data transformed by Hellinger?s method, multiple correspondence analysis for environmental data (latitude, elevation, temperature and average annual rainfall, type of vegetation cover) transformed into discrete classes, coinertia analysis to compare these two data sets, and bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap tests to evaluate the part of the variance of the macrofauna data attributable to each of the environmental factors. Network analysis was performed. Each pairwise association of taxonomic units was tested against a null model considering local and regional scales, in order to avoid spurious correlations.
RESULTS
Communities were separated into five clusters reflecting their densities and taxonomic richness. They were significantly influenced by climatic conditions, soil texture and vegetation cover. Abundance and diversity, highest in tropical forests (1,895 ± 234 individuals/m2) and savannahs (1,796 ± 72 individuals/m2), progressively decreased in tropical cropping systems (tree-associated crops, 1,358 ± 120 individuals/m2; pastures, 1,178 ± 154 individuals/m2; and annual crops, 867 ± 62 individuals/m2), temperate grasslands (529 ± 60 individuals/m2), forests (232 ± 20 individuals/m2) and annual crops (231 ± 24 individuals/m2) and temperate dry forests and shrubs (195 ± 11 individuals/m2). Agricultural management decreased overall abundance by ≤54% in tropical areas and 64% in temperate areas. Connectivity varied with taxa, with dominant positive connections in litter transformers and negative connections with ecosystem engineers and Arachnida. Connectivity and modularity were higher in communities with low abundance and taxonomic richness.
MAIN CONCLUSIONS.
Soil macroinvertebrate communities respond to climatic, soil and land-cover conditions. All taxa, except termites, are found everywhere, and communities from the five clusters cover a wide range of geographical and environmental conditions. Agricultural practices significantly decrease abundance, although the presence of tree components alleviates this effect. MenosAIM. Macroinvertebrates comprise a highly diverse set of taxa with great potential as indicators of soil quality. Communities were sampled at 3,694 sites distributed world-wide. We aimed to analyse the patterns of abundance, composition and network characteristics and their relationships to latitude, mean annual temperature and rainfall, land cover, soil texture and agricultural practices.
LOCATION. Sites are distributed in 41 countries, ranging from 55° S to 57° N latitude, from 0 to 4,000 m in elevation, with annual rainfall ranging from 500 to >3,000 mm and mean temperatures of 5?32°C.
TIME PERIOD. 1980-2018.
MAJOR TAXA STUDIED.
All soil macroinvertebrates: Haplotaxida; Coleoptera; Formicidae; Arachnida; Chilopoda; Diplopoda; Diptera; Isoptera; Isopoda; Homoptera; Hemiptera; Gastropoda; Blattaria; Orthoptera; Lepidoptera; Dermaptera; and ?others?.
METHODS.
Standard ISO 23611-5 sampling protocol was applied at all sites. Data treatment used a set of multivariate analyses, principal components analysis (PCA) on macrofauna data transformed by Hellinger?s method, multiple correspondence analysis for environmental data (latitude, elevation, temperature and average annual rainfall, type of vegetation cover) transformed into discrete classes, coinertia analysis to compare these two data sets, and bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap tests to evaluate the part of the variance of the macrofauna data attributable to each of the environmental factors. Network analysis was perf... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Banco de dados; Cobertura da terra; Communities; Ecologia do solo; Macrofauna; Macrofauna database; Macroinvertebrados; Network analysis; Soil macroinvertebrates. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Land cover; Soil ecology. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 05077naa a2200757 a 4500 001 2142258 005 2022-07-11 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13492$2DOI 100 1 $aLAVELLE, P. 245 $aSoil macroinvertebrate communities$ba world-wide assessment.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $aAIM. Macroinvertebrates comprise a highly diverse set of taxa with great potential as indicators of soil quality. Communities were sampled at 3,694 sites distributed world-wide. We aimed to analyse the patterns of abundance, composition and network characteristics and their relationships to latitude, mean annual temperature and rainfall, land cover, soil texture and agricultural practices. LOCATION. Sites are distributed in 41 countries, ranging from 55° S to 57° N latitude, from 0 to 4,000 m in elevation, with annual rainfall ranging from 500 to >3,000 mm and mean temperatures of 5?32°C. TIME PERIOD. 1980-2018. MAJOR TAXA STUDIED. All soil macroinvertebrates: Haplotaxida; Coleoptera; Formicidae; Arachnida; Chilopoda; Diplopoda; Diptera; Isoptera; Isopoda; Homoptera; Hemiptera; Gastropoda; Blattaria; Orthoptera; Lepidoptera; Dermaptera; and ?others?. METHODS. Standard ISO 23611-5 sampling protocol was applied at all sites. Data treatment used a set of multivariate analyses, principal components analysis (PCA) on macrofauna data transformed by Hellinger?s method, multiple correspondence analysis for environmental data (latitude, elevation, temperature and average annual rainfall, type of vegetation cover) transformed into discrete classes, coinertia analysis to compare these two data sets, and bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap tests to evaluate the part of the variance of the macrofauna data attributable to each of the environmental factors. Network analysis was performed. Each pairwise association of taxonomic units was tested against a null model considering local and regional scales, in order to avoid spurious correlations. RESULTS Communities were separated into five clusters reflecting their densities and taxonomic richness. They were significantly influenced by climatic conditions, soil texture and vegetation cover. Abundance and diversity, highest in tropical forests (1,895 ± 234 individuals/m2) and savannahs (1,796 ± 72 individuals/m2), progressively decreased in tropical cropping systems (tree-associated crops, 1,358 ± 120 individuals/m2; pastures, 1,178 ± 154 individuals/m2; and annual crops, 867 ± 62 individuals/m2), temperate grasslands (529 ± 60 individuals/m2), forests (232 ± 20 individuals/m2) and annual crops (231 ± 24 individuals/m2) and temperate dry forests and shrubs (195 ± 11 individuals/m2). Agricultural management decreased overall abundance by ≤54% in tropical areas and 64% in temperate areas. Connectivity varied with taxa, with dominant positive connections in litter transformers and negative connections with ecosystem engineers and Arachnida. Connectivity and modularity were higher in communities with low abundance and taxonomic richness. MAIN CONCLUSIONS. Soil macroinvertebrate communities respond to climatic, soil and land-cover conditions. All taxa, except termites, are found everywhere, and communities from the five clusters cover a wide range of geographical and environmental conditions. Agricultural practices significantly decrease abundance, although the presence of tree components alleviates this effect. 650 $aLand cover 650 $aSoil ecology 653 $aBanco de dados 653 $aCobertura da terra 653 $aCommunities 653 $aEcologia do solo 653 $aMacrofauna 653 $aMacrofauna database 653 $aMacroinvertebrados 653 $aNetwork analysis 653 $aSoil macroinvertebrates 700 1 $aMATHIEU, J. 700 1 $aSPAIN. A. 700 1 $aBROWN, G. G. 700 1 $aFRAGOSO, C. 700 1 $aLAPIED, E. 700 1 $aAQUINO, A. de 700 1 $aBAROIS, I. 700 1 $aBARRIOS, E. 700 1 $aBARROS, M. E. 700 1 $aBEDANO, J. C. 700 1 $aBLANCHART, E. 700 1 $aCAULFIELD, M. 700 1 $aCHAGUEZA, Y. 700 1 $aDAI, J. 700 1 $aDECAËNS, T. 700 1 $aDOMINGUEZ, A. 700 1 $aDOMINGUEZ, Y. 700 1 $aFEIJOO, A. 700 1 $aFOLGARAIT, P. 700 1 $aFONTE, S. J. 700 1 $aGOROSITO, N. 700 1 $aHUERTA, E. 700 1 $aJIMENEZ, J. J. 700 1 $aKELLY, C. 700 1 $aLORANGER, G. 700 1 $aMARCHAO, R. L. 700 1 $aMARICHAL, R. 700 1 $aPRAXEDES, C. 700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, L. 700 1 $aROUSSEAU, G. 700 1 $aROUSSEAU, L. 700 1 $aRUIZ, N. 700 1 $aSANABRIA, C. 700 1 $aSUAREZ, J. C. 700 1 $aTONDOH, J. E. 700 1 $aVALENÇA, A. de 700 1 $aVANEK, S. J. 700 1 $aVASQUEZ, J. 700 1 $aVELASQUEZ, E. 700 1 $aWEBSTER, E. 700 1 $aZHANG, C. 773 $tGlobal Ecology and Biogeography$gv. 31, n. 7, p. 1261-1276, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
![](/consulta/web/img/deny.png) | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Semiárido. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
Data corrente: |
29/09/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
29/09/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
BOMFIM, C. S. G.; SILVA, V. B. da; CURSINO, L. H. S.; MATTOS, W. da S.; SANTOS, J. C. S.; SOUZA, L. S. B. de; DANTAS, B. F.; FREITAS, A. D. S. de; FERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I. |
Afiliação: |
Cláudia Silva Gomes Bomfim, Univasf; Valéria Borges da Silva, UFPB; Luiz Henrique Santos Cursino, Bolsista UPE; Wesley da Silva Mattos, Bolsista UPE; Jéssica Caroline Souza Santos, Bolsista UPE; Layane Silva Barbosa de Souza, Bolsista UFRPE; BARBARA FRANCA DANTAS, CPATSA; Ana Dolores Santiago de Freitas, Bolsista UFRPE; PAULO IVAN FERNANDES JUNIOR, CPATSA. |
Título: |
Endophytic bacteria naturally inhabiting commercial maize seeds occupy different niches and are efficient plant growth-promoting agent. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Symbiosis, v. 81, p. 255?269, august 2020. |
ISSN: |
0334-5114 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-020-00701-z |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The isolation of seed-endophytic bacteria (SEB) is a promising approach for the selection of maize plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). With the hypothesis that maize seeds harbor SEB that occupy different niches and show plant-growth-promoting abilities, we aimed to isolate and characterize the potential PGPB from these seeds. The bacteria from commercial seeds (BRS Gorutuba) and axenically grown maize-seedlings were isolated, molecularly fingerprinted, and genetically characterized by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). All SEB were evaluated for their promotion of early root growth. The selected strains were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and evaluated for their plant growth-promotion traits. A pot experiment was conducted to assess the ability of the SEB to promote maize-growth and nutrient accumulation. Fifty-one bacterial strains were retrieved, mostly isolated directly from the seeds. All the isolated bacteria represented different strains according to their molecular fingerprinting. ARDRA clustering revealed six clusters influenced by their plant tissue/organ of origin. Twenty-nine SEB were selected based on their influence on early root growth. The 16S rRNA sequences classified the SEB as Bacillus (22), Paenibacillus (2) and Acinetobacter (5). The inoculation of Bacillus ESA 674 improved the shoot dry mass in 57% and the Acinetobacter ESA 662 improved the root growth by 235%, both compared to the uninoculated control. At least 12 bacteria improved nutrient content in the shoots. The Bacillus spp. ESA 674 and ESA 652 outstood in improving maize nutrition by increasing the accumulation of several nutrients. MenosThe isolation of seed-endophytic bacteria (SEB) is a promising approach for the selection of maize plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). With the hypothesis that maize seeds harbor SEB that occupy different niches and show plant-growth-promoting abilities, we aimed to isolate and characterize the potential PGPB from these seeds. The bacteria from commercial seeds (BRS Gorutuba) and axenically grown maize-seedlings were isolated, molecularly fingerprinted, and genetically characterized by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). All SEB were evaluated for their promotion of early root growth. The selected strains were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and evaluated for their plant growth-promotion traits. A pot experiment was conducted to assess the ability of the SEB to promote maize-growth and nutrient accumulation. Fifty-one bacterial strains were retrieved, mostly isolated directly from the seeds. All the isolated bacteria represented different strains according to their molecular fingerprinting. ARDRA clustering revealed six clusters influenced by their plant tissue/organ of origin. Twenty-nine SEB were selected based on their influence on early root growth. The 16S rRNA sequences classified the SEB as Bacillus (22), Paenibacillus (2) and Acinetobacter (5). The inoculation of Bacillus ESA 674 improved the shoot dry mass in 57% and the Acinetobacter ESA 662 improved the root growth by 235%, both compared to the uninoculated control. At least 12 bacteria imp... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Isolamento de bactérias endofíticas; Nutrição de planta. |
Thesagro: |
Absorção de Nutrientes; Bacilo; Bactéria; Milho; Semente. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Acinetobacter; Plant growth control; Seed-borne bacteria. |
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
Marc: |
LEADER 02786naa a2200361 a 4500 001 2125163 005 2020-09-29 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0334-5114 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-020-00701-z$2DOI 100 1 $aBOMFIM, C. S. G. 245 $aEndophytic bacteria naturally inhabiting commercial maize seeds occupy different niches and are efficient plant growth-promoting agent.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aThe isolation of seed-endophytic bacteria (SEB) is a promising approach for the selection of maize plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). With the hypothesis that maize seeds harbor SEB that occupy different niches and show plant-growth-promoting abilities, we aimed to isolate and characterize the potential PGPB from these seeds. The bacteria from commercial seeds (BRS Gorutuba) and axenically grown maize-seedlings were isolated, molecularly fingerprinted, and genetically characterized by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). All SEB were evaluated for their promotion of early root growth. The selected strains were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and evaluated for their plant growth-promotion traits. A pot experiment was conducted to assess the ability of the SEB to promote maize-growth and nutrient accumulation. Fifty-one bacterial strains were retrieved, mostly isolated directly from the seeds. All the isolated bacteria represented different strains according to their molecular fingerprinting. ARDRA clustering revealed six clusters influenced by their plant tissue/organ of origin. Twenty-nine SEB were selected based on their influence on early root growth. The 16S rRNA sequences classified the SEB as Bacillus (22), Paenibacillus (2) and Acinetobacter (5). The inoculation of Bacillus ESA 674 improved the shoot dry mass in 57% and the Acinetobacter ESA 662 improved the root growth by 235%, both compared to the uninoculated control. At least 12 bacteria improved nutrient content in the shoots. The Bacillus spp. ESA 674 and ESA 652 outstood in improving maize nutrition by increasing the accumulation of several nutrients. 650 $aAcinetobacter 650 $aPlant growth control 650 $aSeed-borne bacteria 650 $aAbsorção de Nutrientes 650 $aBacilo 650 $aBactéria 650 $aMilho 650 $aSemente 653 $aIsolamento de bactérias endofíticas 653 $aNutrição de planta 700 1 $aSILVA, V. B. da 700 1 $aCURSINO, L. H. S. 700 1 $aMATTOS, W. da S. 700 1 $aSANTOS, J. C. S. 700 1 $aSOUZA, L. S. B. de 700 1 $aDANTAS, B. F. 700 1 $aFREITAS, A. D. S. de 700 1 $aFERNANDES JUNIOR, P. I. 773 $tSymbiosis$gv. 81, p. 255?269, august 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|