| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 50 | |
| 7. |  | SANTOS, R. S.; GODOY, K. B.; SOUZA, G. S. de. Inventário de borboletas (Lepidoptera) da coleção entomológica didática da Universidade Federal do Acre, Campus Floresta, Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre. Evidência: Biociências, Saúde e Inovação, v. 22, n. 2, p. 115-126, jul./dez. 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre. |
|    |
| 10. | | SANTOS, S. A.; COSTA, C.; SOUZA, G. S. e; CRISPIM, S. M. A.; ALVAREZ, J. M. Seletividade da dieta por bovinos em pastagem nativa, na sub-regiao da Nhecolandia, Pantanal. In: REUNIAO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 39., 2002, Recife. A producao animal e a sociedade brasileira. Anais. Recife: UFRPE / SBZ, 2002. CD-ROM. (Secao Forragicultura). Nao paginado.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 15. | | AQUINO, S. T. M. de; BATISTA, K. D.; SANTOS, R. F. dos; SOUZA, G. S. Acúmulo de massa seca em plantas jovens de cedro doce em função da omissão de nutrientes. In: SEMANA NACIONAL DE CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA NO ESTADO DE RORAIMA, 11., 2016, Boa Vista, RR. Resumos... Boa Vista, RR: UERR, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Roraima. |
| |
| 16. | | ROQUE, A. A. de O.; SOUZA, Z. M. de; BARBOSA, R. S.; SOUZA, G. S. de. Controle de tráfego agrícola e atributos físicos do solo em área cultivada com cana-de-açúcar. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 45, n. 7, p. 744-750, jul. 2010 Título em inglês: Agricultural traffic control and soil physical attributes in sugarcane areas.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 20. | | ÁLVARES, V. de S.; SOUZA, J. M. L. de; SOUZA, G. S. de. Potencial da região produtora da "Farinha de Cruzeiro do Sul" para a Indicação Geográfica. In: SOUZA, J. M. L. de; ÁLVARES, V. de S.; NÓBREGA, M. de S. (ed.). Indicação geográfica da farinha de mandioca de Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre. Rio Branco, AC: Embrapa Acre, 2017. cap. 1, p. 21-33.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 50 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/06/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
21/07/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SANTOS, S. A.; SOUZA, G. S.; TOMICH, T. R.; MORAIS, M. da G.; FRANCO, G.; ABREU, U. G. P. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
SANDRA APARECIDA SANTOS, CPAP; GERALDO DA SILVA E SOUZA; THIERRY RIBEIRO TOMICH, CNPGL; MARIA DA GRAÇA MORAIS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO MATO GROSSO DO SUL- UFMS; GUMERCINDO FRANCO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS- UFMS; URBANO GOMES PINTO DE ABREU, CPAP. |
|
Título: |
Protein-energy supplementation for different categories of animals in beef cattle on natural and cultivated pastures of the Brazilian Pantanal. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Annals of Agricultural & Crop Sciences, v. 5, n. 1, id1059, p. 1-8, 2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of protein-energy supplementation during the dry period on the performance of different categories of beef cattle in different management systems of natural and cultivated pastures in the Brazilian Pantanal. Different categories of animals (weaned calves, heifers, primiparous and multiparous cows) were stratified by weight and distributed in one of the following feeding treatments: T1 - natural pasture (grazed), with liquid supplementation (control); T2 - natural pasture (deferred grazing), with liquid supplementation; T3 - cultivated pasture (deferred grazing),with liquid supplementation, from June to September 2006. A continuous stocking method was adopted (0.3, 0.6 and 0.6 of Animal Unit per hectare (AU/ha) for T1, T2 and T3, respectively). Forage availability and quality, supplement intake by livestock, animal performance and ingestive behavior were evaluated over two periods, totaling 90 days of evaluation. Analysis of variance showed differences between initial weight and finished weight in each period between different feeding treatments and animal categories. Animal weight gains were observed during the initial period (mid-season drought), when 440 to 2.800 kg DM forage/ha was available, while weight losses were observed in the final period (late-season drought) when 580 to 800 kg DM forage/ha was available. In the late-season drought, T3 allowed less weight loss among the categories. Primiparous and multiparous cows lost more weight and these higher losses may be related to the higher demand for dry matter intake these categories require. Considering forage offer as the limiting factor during the second period, we concluded that protein-energy supplementation is viable only when the stocking rate is adjusted according to availability of forage. MenosThe goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of protein-energy supplementation during the dry period on the performance of different categories of beef cattle in different management systems of natural and cultivated pastures in the Brazilian Pantanal. Different categories of animals (weaned calves, heifers, primiparous and multiparous cows) were stratified by weight and distributed in one of the following feeding treatments: T1 - natural pasture (grazed), with liquid supplementation (control); T2 - natural pasture (deferred grazing), with liquid supplementation; T3 - cultivated pasture (deferred grazing),with liquid supplementation, from June to September 2006. A continuous stocking method was adopted (0.3, 0.6 and 0.6 of Animal Unit per hectare (AU/ha) for T1, T2 and T3, respectively). Forage availability and quality, supplement intake by livestock, animal performance and ingestive behavior were evaluated over two periods, totaling 90 days of evaluation. Analysis of variance showed differences between initial weight and finished weight in each period between different feeding treatments and animal categories. Animal weight gains were observed during the initial period (mid-season drought), when 440 to 2.800 kg DM forage/ha was available, while weight losses were observed in the final period (late-season drought) when 580 to 800 kg DM forage/ha was available. In the late-season drought, T3 allowed less weight loss among the categories. Primiparous and multiparous cows ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Pastagem Cultivada; Pastagem Nativa; Suplemento Energético; Suplemento Protéico. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Beef cattle; Forage composition; Forage grasses; Pastures; Protein energy malnutrition. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/213674/1/Protein-energy-pastures-2020.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02756naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2018948
005 2020-07-21
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSANTOS, S. A.
245 $aProtein-energy supplementation for different categories of animals in beef cattle on natural and cultivated pastures of the Brazilian Pantanal.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThe goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of protein-energy supplementation during the dry period on the performance of different categories of beef cattle in different management systems of natural and cultivated pastures in the Brazilian Pantanal. Different categories of animals (weaned calves, heifers, primiparous and multiparous cows) were stratified by weight and distributed in one of the following feeding treatments: T1 - natural pasture (grazed), with liquid supplementation (control); T2 - natural pasture (deferred grazing), with liquid supplementation; T3 - cultivated pasture (deferred grazing),with liquid supplementation, from June to September 2006. A continuous stocking method was adopted (0.3, 0.6 and 0.6 of Animal Unit per hectare (AU/ha) for T1, T2 and T3, respectively). Forage availability and quality, supplement intake by livestock, animal performance and ingestive behavior were evaluated over two periods, totaling 90 days of evaluation. Analysis of variance showed differences between initial weight and finished weight in each period between different feeding treatments and animal categories. Animal weight gains were observed during the initial period (mid-season drought), when 440 to 2.800 kg DM forage/ha was available, while weight losses were observed in the final period (late-season drought) when 580 to 800 kg DM forage/ha was available. In the late-season drought, T3 allowed less weight loss among the categories. Primiparous and multiparous cows lost more weight and these higher losses may be related to the higher demand for dry matter intake these categories require. Considering forage offer as the limiting factor during the second period, we concluded that protein-energy supplementation is viable only when the stocking rate is adjusted according to availability of forage.
650 $aBeef cattle
650 $aForage composition
650 $aForage grasses
650 $aPastures
650 $aProtein energy malnutrition
650 $aPastagem Cultivada
650 $aPastagem Nativa
650 $aSuplemento Energético
650 $aSuplemento Protéico
700 1 $aSOUZA, G. S.
700 1 $aTOMICH, T. R.
700 1 $aMORAIS, M. da G.
700 1 $aFRANCO, G.
700 1 $aABREU, U. G. P. de
773 $tAnnals of Agricultural & Crop Sciences$gv. 5, n. 1, id1059, p. 1-8, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
