| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/11/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/11/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ABREU, P. G. de; CORREA, J. C.; FRANZ, I.; MATTEI, R. M.; FEDDERN, V.; ABREU, V. M. N. |
|
Afiliação: |
PAULO GIOVANNI DE ABREU, CNPSA; JULIANO CORULLI CORREA, CNPSA; IZAURA FRANZ, UNC; ROSEMARI MARTINI, CNPSA; VIVIAN FEDDERN, CNPSA; VALERIA MARIA NASCIMENTO ABREU, CNPSA. |
|
Título: |
Composting time of chicken litter with biochar for organic fertilizer production. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE BIOCHARS, COMPOSTS, AND DIGESTATES. PRODUCTION, CHARACTERIZATION, REGULATION, MARKETING, USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, 2013, Bari. Abstracts? Bari: University of Bari ?Aldo Moro?, 2013. 1 Pen-Drive. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fertilizante orgânico; Organic fertilizer. |
|
Thesagro: |
Compostagem; Galinha. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Chickens; Composting. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/92701/1/final7125.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00850nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1971440
005 2013-11-18
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aABREU, P. G. de
245 $aComposting time of chicken litter with biochar for organic fertilizer production.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE BIOCHARS, COMPOSTS, AND DIGESTATES. PRODUCTION, CHARACTERIZATION, REGULATION, MARKETING, USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, 2013, Bari. Abstracts? Bari: University of Bari ?Aldo Moro?, 2013. 1 Pen-Drive.$c2013
650 $aChickens
650 $aComposting
650 $aCompostagem
650 $aGalinha
653 $aFertilizante orgânico
653 $aOrganic fertilizer
700 1 $aCORREA, J. C.
700 1 $aFRANZ, I.
700 1 $aMATTEI, R. M.
700 1 $aFEDDERN, V.
700 1 $aABREU, V. M. N.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/06/2001 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/12/2022 |
|
Autoria: |
CARDOSE, E. C.; McDOWELL, L. R.; VALE, W. G.; VEIGA, J. B.; SIMÃO NETO, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
FCAP; UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; CPATU; JONAS BASTOS DA VEIGA, CPATU; MIGUEL SIMÃO NETO, CPATU. |
|
Título: |
Mineral status of buffaloes and cattle grazing Brachiaria humidicola pastures in Marajo Island, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1999 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
International Journal of Animal Science, v. 14, p. 1-7, 1999. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sixteen crossbred cattle (Bos indicus) and 16 crossbred buffalo (Bubalus bubalis Linn.) were assigned equally to one of two treatrnents (TI or TI) : treatrnent 1 animais (cattle or buffalo) received mineral supplementation and T2 animaIs (cattle or buffalo) received no mineral supplementation. Mineral status was evaluated and the effect of mineral supplementation on animal perforrnance and mineral concentration in bone and liver was deterrnined. Eight four hectare paddocks of Brachiaria humidicola pastures were utilized by two replication treatrnents of foui animais each. Grass samples were col!ected and animal mineral supplement consumption was deterrnined each 28 days. Bone and liver were col!ected at the end of dry season and at the end of the rainy season. Calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were deterrnined in grass and in animal bone tissue. Copper (Cu), Cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) were deterrnined in grass and in liver tissue. B. humidicola had P, Cu and Zn nutritional limitations for both grazing buffaloes and cattle. In both animal species, mineral supplementation increases the Ca : P ratio and ash concentration in bone and the Cu content in Iiver. Cattle and buffalo consumed more mineral supplement in the dry season than in the rainy season. Buffalo mineral consumption was lower than cattle, particularly at the beginning of the experiment. Animal Iiveweight gain was higher in the rainy season than in the dry season, and it was higher in buffalo than cattle at the end of the dry season and in the middle ofthe rainy season. Although not significant (P>0.05), mineral supplementation appeared to increase weight gains in both bufTalo and cattle. Although mineral supplement consumption differs between cattle and buffalo, it is dependent on a number offactors inc1uding season and nutritional quality ofthe forage. Buffalo Iivestock production at Majaró Island could be more suited for cattle, but more research is needed in mineral nutrition for this species in tropical regions. MenosSixteen crossbred cattle (Bos indicus) and 16 crossbred buffalo (Bubalus bubalis Linn.) were assigned equally to one of two treatrnents (TI or TI) : treatrnent 1 animais (cattle or buffalo) received mineral supplementation and T2 animaIs (cattle or buffalo) received no mineral supplementation. Mineral status was evaluated and the effect of mineral supplementation on animal perforrnance and mineral concentration in bone and liver was deterrnined. Eight four hectare paddocks of Brachiaria humidicola pastures were utilized by two replication treatrnents of foui animais each. Grass samples were col!ected and animal mineral supplement consumption was deterrnined each 28 days. Bone and liver were col!ected at the end of dry season and at the end of the rainy season. Calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were deterrnined in grass and in animal bone tissue. Copper (Cu), Cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) were deterrnined in grass and in liver tissue. B. humidicola had P, Cu and Zn nutritional limitations for both grazing buffaloes and cattle. In both animal species, mineral supplementation increases the Ca : P ratio and ash concentration in bone and the Cu content in Iiver. Cattle and buffalo consumed more mineral supplement in the dry season than in the rainy season. Buffalo mineral consumption was lower than cattle, particularly at the beginning of the experiment. Animal Iiveweight gain was higher in the rainy season than in the dry season, and it was higher in buffalo... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Bront; Bubalino; Ilha de Marajó; Mineral nutrients; Pará; Water buffaloes. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Nutrição Animal; Nutriente Mineral; Pastejo; Performance. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; animal nutrition; grazing. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03005naa a2200361 a 4500
001 1400483
005 2022-12-06
008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCARDOSE, E. C.
245 $aMineral status of buffaloes and cattle grazing Brachiaria humidicola pastures in Marajo Island, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c1999
300 $cil.
520 $aSixteen crossbred cattle (Bos indicus) and 16 crossbred buffalo (Bubalus bubalis Linn.) were assigned equally to one of two treatrnents (TI or TI) : treatrnent 1 animais (cattle or buffalo) received mineral supplementation and T2 animaIs (cattle or buffalo) received no mineral supplementation. Mineral status was evaluated and the effect of mineral supplementation on animal perforrnance and mineral concentration in bone and liver was deterrnined. Eight four hectare paddocks of Brachiaria humidicola pastures were utilized by two replication treatrnents of foui animais each. Grass samples were col!ected and animal mineral supplement consumption was deterrnined each 28 days. Bone and liver were col!ected at the end of dry season and at the end of the rainy season. Calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were deterrnined in grass and in animal bone tissue. Copper (Cu), Cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) were deterrnined in grass and in liver tissue. B. humidicola had P, Cu and Zn nutritional limitations for both grazing buffaloes and cattle. In both animal species, mineral supplementation increases the Ca : P ratio and ash concentration in bone and the Cu content in Iiver. Cattle and buffalo consumed more mineral supplement in the dry season than in the rainy season. Buffalo mineral consumption was lower than cattle, particularly at the beginning of the experiment. Animal Iiveweight gain was higher in the rainy season than in the dry season, and it was higher in buffalo than cattle at the end of the dry season and in the middle ofthe rainy season. Although not significant (P>0.05), mineral supplementation appeared to increase weight gains in both bufTalo and cattle. Although mineral supplement consumption differs between cattle and buffalo, it is dependent on a number offactors inc1uding season and nutritional quality ofthe forage. Buffalo Iivestock production at Majaró Island could be more suited for cattle, but more research is needed in mineral nutrition for this species in tropical regions.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aanimal nutrition
650 $agrazing
650 $aBovino
650 $aNutrição Animal
650 $aNutriente Mineral
650 $aPastejo
650 $aPerformance
653 $aBrasil
653 $aBront
653 $aBubalino
653 $aIlha de Marajó
653 $aMineral nutrients
653 $aPará
653 $aWater buffaloes
700 1 $aMcDOWELL, L. R.
700 1 $aVALE, W. G.
700 1 $aVEIGA, J. B.
700 1 $aSIMÃO NETO, M.
773 $tInternational Journal of Animal Science$gv. 14, p. 1-7, 1999.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
