| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 33 | |
| 14. |  | CRUZ, E. D.; NEVES, M. do P. H. das; SERRÃO, E. A. S. Caracterização e avaliação de Stylosanthes guianensis, (Aubl) Sw. "tardio" na região de Belém do Pará. In: SIMPÓSIO DO TRÓPICO ÚMIDO, 1., 1984, Belém, PA. Anais. Belém, PA: EMBRAPA-CPATU, 1986. v. 5, p. 77-82. (EMBRAPA-CPATU. Documentos, 36). v.5 Pastagem e produção animal.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|    |
| 15. | | CRUZ, E. D.; NEVES, M. do P. H. das; SERRÃO, E. A. S. Caracterização e avaliação de Stylosanthes guianensis, "tardio", (Aubl) Sw. na região de Belém, Pará. In: SIMPÓSIO DO TRÓPICO ÚMIDO, 1., 1984, Belém, PA. Resumos. Belém, PA: EMBRAPA-CPATU, 1984. p. 324. (EMBRAPA-CPATU. Documentos, 31).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 17. | | NEVES, M. do P. H. das; COSTA, V. L. da S.; ROCHA, L. A. L. Documentação, conservação e caracterização de uma matriz do gênero Hevea, coletada em Paragominas-PA. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE HEVEICULTURA, 5., 2017, Goiânia. Anais... Jaboticabal: Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa, Ensino e Extensão, 2017. p. 148-152.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 33 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Clima Temperado. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpact.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/08/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
OVERBECK, G. E.; VÉLEZ-MARTIN, E.; MENEZES, L. da S.; ANAND, M.; BAEZA, S.; CARLUCCI, M. B.; DECHOUM, M. S.; DURIGAN, G.; FIDELIS, A.; GUIDO, A.; MORO, M. F.; MUNHOZ, C. B. R.; REGINATO, M.; RODRIGUES, R. S.; ROSENFIELD, M. F.; SAMPAIO, A. B.; SILVA, F. H. B. da; SILVEIRA, F. A. O.; SOSINSKI JUNIOR, E. E.; STAUDE, I. R.; TEMPERTON, V. M.; TURCHETTO, C.; VELDMAN, J. W.; VIANA, P. L.; ZAPPI, D. C.; MÜLLER, S. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
GERHARD ERNST OVERBECK, UFRGS; EDUARDO VÉLEZ-MARTIN, UFRGS; LUCIANA DA SILVA MENEZES, UFRGS; MADHUR ANAND, University of Guelph; SANTIAGO BAEZA, Universidad de la República; MARCOS B. CARLUCCI, Universidade Federal do Paraná; MICHELE S. DECHOUM, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; GISELDA DURIGAN, Floresta Estadual de Assis, Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais; ALESSANDRA FIDELIS, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro; ANACLARA GUIDO, Universidad de la República; MARCELO FREIRE MORO, Universidade Federal do Ceará; CÁSSIA BEATRIZ RODRIGUES MUNHOZ, Universidade de Brasília; MARCELO REGINATO, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; RODRIGO SCHÜTZ RODRIGUES, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; MILENA FERMINA ROSENFIELD, The Nature Conservancy Brasil; ALEXANDRE B. SAMPAIO, Centro Nacional de Avaliação da Biodiversidade e de Pesquisa e Conservação do Cerrado, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; FERNANDO HENRIQUE BARBOSA DA SILVA, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso; FERNANDO A. O. SILVEIRA, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; ENIO EGON SOSINSKI JUNIOR, CPACT; INGMAR R. STAUDE, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; VICKY M. TEMPERTON, Leuphana-Universty of Lüneburg; CAROLINE TURCHETTO, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; JOSEPH W. VELDMAN, Texas A&M University; PEDRO L. VIANA, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi; DANIELA C. ZAPPI, Universidade de Brasília; SANDRA C. MÜLLER, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. |
|
Título: |
Placing Brazil's grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, v. 56, 125687, Sept. 2022. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Available online 3 June 2022. |
|
Conteúdo: |
In Brazil, the country with the highest plant species richness in the world, biodiverse savannas and grasslands ? i.e., grassy ecosystems, which occupy 27% of the country ? have historically been neglected in conservation and scientific treatments. Reasons for this neglect include misconceptions about the characteristics and dynamics of these ecosystems, as well as inconsistent or regionally restricted terminology that impeded a more adequate communication about Brazil's savannas and grasslands, both within the country and internationally. Toward improved communication and recognition of Brazil?s diversity of ecosystems, we present the key drivers that control the main types of grassy ecosystems across Brazil (including in regions of the country where forests dominate). In doing so, we synthesize the main features of each grassy ecosystem in terms of physiognomy and ecological dynamics (e.g., relationships with herbivores and fire). We propose a terminology both for major grassland regions and for regionally relevant vegetation physiognomies. We also discuss terms associated with human land management and restoration of grassy ecosystems. Finally, we suggest key research needs to advance our understanding of the ecology and conservation values of Brazil?s grassy ecosystems. We expect that a common and shared terminology and understanding, as proposed here, will stimulate more integrative research that will be fundamental to developing improved conservation and restoration strategies. MenosIn Brazil, the country with the highest plant species richness in the world, biodiverse savannas and grasslands ? i.e., grassy ecosystems, which occupy 27% of the country ? have historically been neglected in conservation and scientific treatments. Reasons for this neglect include misconceptions about the characteristics and dynamics of these ecosystems, as well as inconsistent or regionally restricted terminology that impeded a more adequate communication about Brazil's savannas and grasslands, both within the country and internationally. Toward improved communication and recognition of Brazil?s diversity of ecosystems, we present the key drivers that control the main types of grassy ecosystems across Brazil (including in regions of the country where forests dominate). In doing so, we synthesize the main features of each grassy ecosystem in terms of physiognomy and ecological dynamics (e.g., relationships with herbivores and fire). We propose a terminology both for major grassland regions and for regionally relevant vegetation physiognomies. We also discuss terms associated with human land management and restoration of grassy ecosystems. Finally, we suggest key research needs to advance our understanding of the ecology and conservation values of Brazil?s grassy ecosystems. We expect that a common and shared terminology and understanding, as proposed here, will stimulate more integrative research that will be fundamental to developing improved conservation and restoration st... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Campo; Cerrado; Gramínea; Pastagem; Vegetação. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02867naa a2200493 a 4500
001 2144142
005 2022-08-11
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOVERBECK, G. E.
245 $aPlacing Brazil's grasslands and savannas on the map of science and conservation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aAvailable online 3 June 2022.
520 $aIn Brazil, the country with the highest plant species richness in the world, biodiverse savannas and grasslands ? i.e., grassy ecosystems, which occupy 27% of the country ? have historically been neglected in conservation and scientific treatments. Reasons for this neglect include misconceptions about the characteristics and dynamics of these ecosystems, as well as inconsistent or regionally restricted terminology that impeded a more adequate communication about Brazil's savannas and grasslands, both within the country and internationally. Toward improved communication and recognition of Brazil?s diversity of ecosystems, we present the key drivers that control the main types of grassy ecosystems across Brazil (including in regions of the country where forests dominate). In doing so, we synthesize the main features of each grassy ecosystem in terms of physiognomy and ecological dynamics (e.g., relationships with herbivores and fire). We propose a terminology both for major grassland regions and for regionally relevant vegetation physiognomies. We also discuss terms associated with human land management and restoration of grassy ecosystems. Finally, we suggest key research needs to advance our understanding of the ecology and conservation values of Brazil?s grassy ecosystems. We expect that a common and shared terminology and understanding, as proposed here, will stimulate more integrative research that will be fundamental to developing improved conservation and restoration strategies.
650 $aCampo
650 $aCerrado
650 $aGramínea
650 $aPastagem
650 $aVegetação
700 1 $aVÉLEZ-MARTIN, E.
700 1 $aMENEZES, L. da S.
700 1 $aANAND, M.
700 1 $aBAEZA, S.
700 1 $aCARLUCCI, M. B.
700 1 $aDECHOUM, M. S.
700 1 $aDURIGAN, G.
700 1 $aFIDELIS, A.
700 1 $aGUIDO, A.
700 1 $aMORO, M. F.
700 1 $aMUNHOZ, C. B. R.
700 1 $aREGINATO, M.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, R. S.
700 1 $aROSENFIELD, M. F.
700 1 $aSAMPAIO, A. B.
700 1 $aSILVA, F. H. B. da
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, F. A. O.
700 1 $aSOSINSKI JUNIOR, E. E.
700 1 $aSTAUDE, I. R.
700 1 $aTEMPERTON, V. M.
700 1 $aTURCHETTO, C.
700 1 $aVELDMAN, J. W.
700 1 $aVIANA, P. L.
700 1 $aZAPPI, D. C.
700 1 $aMÜLLER, S. C.
773 $tPerspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics$gv. 56, 125687, Sept. 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
