| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 125 | |
| 101. |  | GRANATO, I. S. C.; MARINHO, C. D.; ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e; FERREIRA, K. C. Z.; ROSSE, L. N.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Seleção de marcadores para os métodos RR-BLUP e BLASSO na seleção genômica ampla. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 7., 2013, Uberlândia. Variedade melhorada: a força da nossa agricultura: anais. Viçosa, MG: SBMP, 2013. p. 285-288.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|    |
| 102. | | GRANATO, I. S. C.; MARINHO, C. D.; ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e; FERREIRA, K. C. Z.; ROSSE, L. N.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Seleção de marcadores para os métodos RR-BLUP e BLASSO na seleção genômica ampla. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 7., 2013, Uberlândia. Variedade melhorada: a força da nossa agricultura: anais. Viçosa, MG: SBMP, 2013. p. 285-288.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 103. | | EVANGELISTA, J. S. P. C.; PEIXOTO, M. A.; COELHO, I. F.; ALVES, R. S.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. L. da; BHERING, L. L. Environmental stratification and genotype recommendation toward the soybean ideotype: a Bayesian approach. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, v. 21, n. 1, e359721111, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Café. |
| |
| 104. | | RESENDE, R. T.; SOARES, A. A. V.; FORRESTER, D. I.; MARCATTI, G. E.; SANTOS, A. R. dos; TAKAHASHI, E. K.; SILVA, F. F. e; GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; LEITE, H. G. Environmental uniformity, site quality and tree competition interact to determine stand productivity of clonal Eucalyptus. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 410, p. 76-83, Feb. 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|  |
| 105. | | RAMOS, P. V. B.; SILVA, F. F. e; SILVA, L. O. C. da; SANTIAGO, G. G.; MENEZES, G. R. de O.; VIANA, J. M. S.; TORRES JUNIOR, R. A. de A.; GONDO, A.; LUIZ F. BRITO. Genomic evaluation for novel stayability traits in Nellore cattle. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, v. 55, n. 3, p. 266-273, March 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
| |
| 106. | | SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; ROCHA, G. S.; DUARTE, D. A. S.; LOPES, P. S.; BRUSTOLIN, O. J. B.; THUS, S.; VIANA, J. M. S.; GUIMARÃES, S. E. F. Genomic growth curves of an outbred pig population. Genetics and Molecular Biology, v. 36, n. 4, p. 520-527, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 107. | | ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de A.; GUIMARÃES, J. F. R.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; MUÑOZ, P.; KIRST, M.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R. de. Genomic prediction of additive and non-additive effects using genetic markers and pedigrees. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, v. 9, p. 2739-2748, Aug. 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 108. | | TEIXEIRA, F. R. F.; NASCIMENTO, M.; CECON, P. R.; CRUZ, C. D.; SILVA, F. F. e; NASCIMENTO, A. C. C.; AZEVEDO, C. F.; MARQUES, D. B. D.; SILVA, M. V. G. B.; CARNEIRO, A. P. S.; PAIXAO, D. M. Genomic prediction of lactation curves of Girolando cattle based on nonlinear mixed models. Genetics and Molecular Research, v. 20, n. 1, gmr18691, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 109. | | SOUSA, I. C. de; NASCIMENTO, M.; SILVA, G. N.; NASCIMENTO, A. C. C.; CRUZ, C. D.; SILVA, F. F. e; ALMEIDA, D. P. de; PESTANA, K. N.; AZEVEDO, C. F.; ZAMBOLIM, L.; CAIXETA, E. T. Genomic prediction of leaf rust resistance to Arabica coffee using machine learning algorithms. Scientia Agricola, v. 78, n. 4, e20200021, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Café. |
| |
| 110. | | RESENDE, R. T.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; AZEVEDO, C. F.; SILVA, F. F. e; MELO, L. C.; PEREIRA, H. S.; SOUZA, T. L. P. O. de; VALDISSER, P. A. M. R.; BRONDANI, C.; VIANELLO, R. P. Genome-wide association and regional heritability mapping of plant architecture, lodging and productivity in Phaseolus vulgaris. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, v. 8, p. 2841-2854, Aug. 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 111. | | DUARTE, D. A. S.; FORTES, M. R. S.; DUARTE, M. de S.; GUIMARÃES, S. E. F.; VERARDO, L. L.; VERONEZE, R.; RIBEIRO, A. M. F.; LOPES, P. S.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e. Genome-wide association studies, meta-analyses and derived gene network for meat quality and carcass traits in pigs. Animal Production Science, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1100-1008, May 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 112. | | RAMOS, P. B. B.; MENEZES, G. R. de O.; SILVA, D. A. DA; LOURENCO, D.; SANTIAGO, G. G.; TORRES JUNIOR, R. A. de A.; SILVA, F. F. E; LOPES, P. S.; VERONEZA, R. Genomic analysis of feed efficiency traits in beef cattle using random regression models. Journal Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2023. Online ahead of print.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
| |
| 113. | | CARRARA, E. R.; PEIXOTO, M. G. C. D.; VERONEZE, R.; SILVA, F. F. e; RAMOS, P. V. B.; BRUNELI, F. A. T.; ZADRA, L. E. F.; VENTURA, H. T.; JOSAHKIAN, L. A.; LOPES, P. S. Genetic study of quantitative traits supports the use of Guzerá as dual-purpose cattle. Animal Bioscience, v. 35, n. 7, p. 955-963, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 114. | | SILVA, F. F. e; ZAMBRANO, M. F. B.; VARONA, L.; GLÓRIA, L. S.; LOPES, P. S.; SILVA, M. V. G. B.; ARBEX, W. A.; LÁZARO, S. F.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; GUIMARÃES, S. E. F. Genome association study through nonlinear mixed models revealed new candidate genes for pig growth curves. Scientia Agricola, v. 74, n. 1, 2017. 7 P.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 115. | | SANTANA, T. E. Z.; SILVA, J. C. F.; SILVA, L. O. C. da; ALVARENGA, A. B.; MENEZES, G. R. de O.; TORRES JUNIOR, R. A. de A.; DUARTE, M. de S.; SILVA, F. F. e. Genome-enabled classification of stayability in Nellore cattle under a machine learning framework. Livestock Science, v. 260, article 104935, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
| |
| 116. | | FARIA, G. M. P. de; PEREIRA, C. S.; GRANATO, I. S. C.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e; FERREIRA, K. C. Z.; ROSSE, L. N.; SASALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Controle de qualidade de dados genotípicos para estudos genômicos em clones de eucalipto. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 7., 2013, Uberlândia. Variedade melhorada: a força da nossa agricultura: anais. Viçosa, MG: SBMP, 2013. p. 1068-1071| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 117. | | FARIA, G. M. P. de; PEREIRA, C. S.; GRANATO, I. S. C.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, F. F. e; FERREIRA, K. C. Z.; ROSSE, L. N.; SASALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Controle de qualidade de dados genotípicos para estudos genômicos em clones de eucalipto. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 7., 2013, Uberlândia. Variedade melhorada: a força da nossa agricultura: anais. Viçosa, MG: SBMP, 2013. p. 84-87.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 118. | | ALVES, R. S.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; ROCHA, J. R. do A. S. de C.; PEIXOTO, M. A.; TEODORO, P. E.; SILVA, F. F. e; BHERING, L. L.; SANTOS, G. A. dos. Quantifying individual variation in reaction norms using random regression models fitted through Legendre polynomials: application in eucalyptus breeding. Bragantia, v. 79, n. 4, 2020. p. 360-376.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Café. |
| |
| 119. | | MIRANDA, T. L. R.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; AZEVEDO, C. F.; NUNES, A. C. P.; TAKAHASHI, E. K.; SIMIQUELI, G. F.; SILVA, F. F. e; ALVES, R. S. Evaluation of a new additive-dominance genomic model and implications for quantitative genetics and genomic selection. Scientia Agricola, v. 79, n. 6, p. 1-7, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Café. |
| |
| 120. | | OLIVEIRA, H. R. de; SILVA, F. F. e; SILVA, M. V. G. B.; SIQUEIRA, O. H. G. B. D. de; MACHADO, M. A.; PANETTO, J. C. do C.; GLÓRIA, L. S.; BRITO, L. F. Bayesian Models combining Legendre and B-spline polynomials for genetic analysis of multiple lactations in Gyr cattle. Livestock Science, v. 201, p. 78-84, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 125 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/11/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/11/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de A.; GUIMARÃES, J. F. R.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; MUÑOZ, P.; KIRST, M.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Janeo Eustáquio de Almeida Filho, Universidade Esatdual do Norte Fluminense e "Darcy Ribeiro"; João Filipi Rodrigues Guimarães, Futuragene Ltda; Fabyano Fonsceca e Silva, UFV; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; Patricio Muñoz, University of Florida; Matias Kirst, University of Florida; Marcio Fernando Ribeiro de Resende Júnior, University of Florida. |
|
Título: |
Genomic prediction of additive and non-additive effects using genetic markers and pedigrees. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, v. 9, p. 2739-2748, Aug. 2019. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The genetic merit of individuals can be estimated using models with dense markers and pedigree information. Early genomic models accounted only for additive effects. However, the prediction of non-additive effects is important for different forest breeding systems where the whole genotypic value can be captured through clonal propagation. In this study, we evaluated the integration of marker data with pedigree information, in models that included or ignored non-additive effects. We tested the models Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) and BayesA, with additive and additive-dominance frameworks. Model performance was assessed for the traits tree height, diameter at breast height and rust resistance, measured in 923 pine individuals from a structured population of 71 full-sib families. We have also simulated a population with similar genetic properties and evaluated the performance of models for six simulated traits with distinct genetic architectures. Different cross validation strategies were evaluated, and highest accuracies were achieved using within family cross validation. The inclusion of pedigree information in genomic prediction models did not yield higher accuracies. The different RKHS models resulted in similar predictions accuracies, and RKHS and BayesA generated substantially better predictions than pedigree-only models. The additive-BayesA resulted in higher accuracies than RKHS for rust incidence and in simulated additive-oligogenic traits. For DBH, HT and additive dominance polygenic traits, the RKHS- based models showed slightly higher accuracies than BayesA. Our results indicate that BayesA performs the best for traits with few genes with major effects, while RKHS based models can best predict genotypic effects for clonal selection of complex traits MenosThe genetic merit of individuals can be estimated using models with dense markers and pedigree information. Early genomic models accounted only for additive effects. However, the prediction of non-additive effects is important for different forest breeding systems where the whole genotypic value can be captured through clonal propagation. In this study, we evaluated the integration of marker data with pedigree information, in models that included or ignored non-additive effects. We tested the models Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) and BayesA, with additive and additive-dominance frameworks. Model performance was assessed for the traits tree height, diameter at breast height and rust resistance, measured in 923 pine individuals from a structured population of 71 full-sib families. We have also simulated a population with similar genetic properties and evaluated the performance of models for six simulated traits with distinct genetic architectures. Different cross validation strategies were evaluated, and highest accuracies were achieved using within family cross validation. The inclusion of pedigree information in genomic prediction models did not yield higher accuracies. The different RKHS models resulted in similar predictions accuracies, and RKHS and BayesA generated substantially better predictions than pedigree-only models. The additive-BayesA resulted in higher accuracies than RKHS for rust incidence and in simulated additive-oligogenic traits. For DBH, HT and ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
BayesA; Genomic Prediction; Genotypic Value; GenPred; Oligogenic; Polygenic; Predição genòmica; RKHS; Shared Data Resources. |
|
Thesagro: |
Genótipo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02704naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2114084
005 2019-11-08
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de A.
245 $aGenomic prediction of additive and non-additive effects using genetic markers and pedigrees.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aThe genetic merit of individuals can be estimated using models with dense markers and pedigree information. Early genomic models accounted only for additive effects. However, the prediction of non-additive effects is important for different forest breeding systems where the whole genotypic value can be captured through clonal propagation. In this study, we evaluated the integration of marker data with pedigree information, in models that included or ignored non-additive effects. We tested the models Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) and BayesA, with additive and additive-dominance frameworks. Model performance was assessed for the traits tree height, diameter at breast height and rust resistance, measured in 923 pine individuals from a structured population of 71 full-sib families. We have also simulated a population with similar genetic properties and evaluated the performance of models for six simulated traits with distinct genetic architectures. Different cross validation strategies were evaluated, and highest accuracies were achieved using within family cross validation. The inclusion of pedigree information in genomic prediction models did not yield higher accuracies. The different RKHS models resulted in similar predictions accuracies, and RKHS and BayesA generated substantially better predictions than pedigree-only models. The additive-BayesA resulted in higher accuracies than RKHS for rust incidence and in simulated additive-oligogenic traits. For DBH, HT and additive dominance polygenic traits, the RKHS- based models showed slightly higher accuracies than BayesA. Our results indicate that BayesA performs the best for traits with few genes with major effects, while RKHS based models can best predict genotypic effects for clonal selection of complex traits
650 $aGenótipo
653 $aBayesA
653 $aGenomic Prediction
653 $aGenotypic Value
653 $aGenPred
653 $aOligogenic
653 $aPolygenic
653 $aPredição genòmica
653 $aRKHS
653 $aShared Data Resources
700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, J. F. R.
700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. e
700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de
700 1 $aMUÑOZ, P.
700 1 $aKIRST, M.
700 1 $aRESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R. de
773 $tG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics$gv. 9, p. 2739-2748, Aug. 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
