|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
Data corrente: |
08/03/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/03/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
SHARMA, K.; BOTTON, M.; BORGES, R.; MACHOTA JR, R.; SAROLI, J.; RICO, J.; SILVA, R. O. da; BERNARDI, C.; URRUTIA, W.; MAFRA, L. E. J.; MAFRA-NETO, A. |
Afiliação: |
Kavita Sharma, ISCA Technologies, Inc.; MARCOS BOTTON, CNPUV; Rafael Borges, ISCA Tecnologias Ltda; Ruben Machota Jr, Universidade Federal de Pelotas; Jesse Saroli, ISCA Technologies, Inc; Jonathan Rico, ISCA Technologies, Inc.; Rodrigo Oliveira da Silva, ISCA Technologies, Inc.; Carmem Bernardi, ISCA Technologies, Inc.; William Urrutia, ISCA Technologies, Inc.; Leandro Ernesto Jost Mafra, ISCA Tecnologias Ltda; Agenor Mafra-Neto, ISCA Technologies, Inc. |
Título: |
The advantages of semiochemical-based attract and kill techniques in insect pest management. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ENTOMOLOGY, 25., 2016, Orlando, Flórida. Anais..., Orlando, Flórida: ICE, de 25 a 30 Sept. 2016, Resumo 2557, 2016. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Introduction: Semiochemicals (chemicals impacting insect behavior) have been employed in species-specific, ecologically friendly insect pest control strategies through a wide variety of mechanisms, many of which do not require the application of conventional insecticides. These include mating disruption?application of sex pheromones in such a way that male insects are unable to locate a female mate, reducing the size of the pest population in the treated area over time?mass trapping, and repellency. However, semiochemical attractants can also be used in combination with small amounts of chemical toxicants, a strategy called attract and kill (A&K). |
Palavras-Chave: |
Insect; Insect pest management; Pest. |
Thesagro: |
Inseto; Peste; Praga. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/157405/1/2557.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01555nam a2200301 a 4500 001 2066561 005 2017-03-09 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSHARMA, K. 245 $aThe advantages of semiochemical-based attract and kill techniques in insect pest management.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ENTOMOLOGY, 25., 2016, Orlando, Flórida. Anais..., Orlando, Flórida: ICE, de 25 a 30 Sept. 2016, Resumo 2557$c2016 520 $aIntroduction: Semiochemicals (chemicals impacting insect behavior) have been employed in species-specific, ecologically friendly insect pest control strategies through a wide variety of mechanisms, many of which do not require the application of conventional insecticides. These include mating disruption?application of sex pheromones in such a way that male insects are unable to locate a female mate, reducing the size of the pest population in the treated area over time?mass trapping, and repellency. However, semiochemical attractants can also be used in combination with small amounts of chemical toxicants, a strategy called attract and kill (A&K). 650 $aInseto 650 $aPeste 650 $aPraga 653 $aInsect 653 $aInsect pest management 653 $aPest 700 1 $aBOTTON, M. 700 1 $aBORGES, R. 700 1 $aMACHOTA JR, R. 700 1 $aSAROLI, J. 700 1 $aRICO, J. 700 1 $aSILVA, R. O. da 700 1 $aBERNARDI, C. 700 1 $aURRUTIA, W. 700 1 $aMAFRA, L. E. J. 700 1 $aMAFRA-NETO, A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
Data corrente: |
16/12/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/07/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
JORGE, M. F.; SILVA, L. D. B. da; SILVA, J. B. G.; ALVES, D. G.; HÜTHER, C. M.; CECCHIN, D.; GUERRA, J. G. M.; SANTOS, L. M. M.; FRANCISCO, J. P.; MELO, A. C. F. de; NASCENTES, A. L.; CALLETI, R. P. K. |
Afiliação: |
MARCOS FILGUEIRAS JORGE, UFRRJ; LEONARDO DUARTE BATISTA DA SILVA, UFRRJ; JONATHAS BATISTA GONÇALVES SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE JUIZ DE FORA; DINARA GRASIELA ALVES, UFRRJ; CRISTINA MOLL HÜTHER, UFF; DAIANE CECCHIN, UFF; JOSE GUILHERME MARINHO GUERRA, CNPAB; LUISE MARIA MARTINS SANTOS, UFRRJ; JOÃO PAULO FRANCISCO, UEM; ANTONIO CARLOS FARIAS DE MELO, UFRRJ; ALEXANDRE LIOI NASCENTES, UFRRJ; ROZILENI PIONT KOVSKY CALETTI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MARINGÁ. |
Título: |
Biological pilot treatment reduces physicochemical and microbiological parameters of dairy cattle wastewater |
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 30, n.1 2, p. 34775-34792, 2023. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24681-3 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The objectives of the present study were to characterize and evaluate a pilot treatment unit (PTU) for dairy cattle wastewater (DCW) in relation to its efficiency in reducing the physicochemical and microbiological parameters and possible application of this fertilizer in organic production. A PTU was set up, composed of the following elements: a dung pit of 7.8 m 3 , already in place; a septic tank; a set of anaerobic biological filters comprising an upflow filter and a downward-flow filter filled with fragments PVC corrugated conduit; and two constructed wetland systems (CWSs) of horizontal subsurface flow in two par- allel routes (Routes 1 and 2), controlled by means of a flow rate divider box. Route 1 passed through CWS 1 cultivated with cattail (Typha domingensis) and Route 2 passed through CWS 2 cultivated with vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides). To evaluate the treatment stages, biweekly investigations were carried out to collect effluent samples. The results of moni- toring, in absolute values, were evaluated by means of the medians and variation coefficients and compared by means of Kruskal?Wallis non-parametric test followed by the Student Newman Keuls test. The treatment efficiencies of Routes 1 and 2 were calculated. The influence of vetiver on the removal of nutrients from the DCW was analyzed and the productivity estimate (t.ha ?1 ) was performed. CWS 1 was not able to reduce the organic load indices, but it was able to retain fatty mate- rial and sodium. CWS 2 showed a reduction in nitrogenous forms and also for other nutrients, achieving the greatest removal of sodium and greatest decay of fecal contamination indicators, thermotolerant coliforms (56.13%), and E. coli (46.82%) MenosThe objectives of the present study were to characterize and evaluate a pilot treatment unit (PTU) for dairy cattle wastewater (DCW) in relation to its efficiency in reducing the physicochemical and microbiological parameters and possible application of this fertilizer in organic production. A PTU was set up, composed of the following elements: a dung pit of 7.8 m 3 , already in place; a septic tank; a set of anaerobic biological filters comprising an upflow filter and a downward-flow filter filled with fragments PVC corrugated conduit; and two constructed wetland systems (CWSs) of horizontal subsurface flow in two par- allel routes (Routes 1 and 2), controlled by means of a flow rate divider box. Route 1 passed through CWS 1 cultivated with cattail (Typha domingensis) and Route 2 passed through CWS 2 cultivated with vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides). To evaluate the treatment stages, biweekly investigations were carried out to collect effluent samples. The results of moni- toring, in absolute values, were evaluated by means of the medians and variation coefficients and compared by means of Kruskal?Wallis non-parametric test followed by the Student Newman Keuls test. The treatment efficiencies of Routes 1 and 2 were calculated. The influence of vetiver on the removal of nutrients from the DCW was analyzed and the productivity estimate (t.ha ?1 ) was performed. CWS 1 was not able to reduce the organic load indices, but it was able to retain fatty mate- rial and sodium. ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Constructed wetland; Microbiological parameters; Nutrient extraction; Pilot treatment unit; Removal of contaminants. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agricultural wastes. |
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
Marc: |
LEADER 02807naa a2200337 a 4500 001 2149850 005 2023-07-12 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24681-3$2DOI 100 1 $aJORGE, M. F. 245 $aBiological pilot treatment reduces physicochemical and microbiological parameters of dairy cattle wastewater$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 520 $aThe objectives of the present study were to characterize and evaluate a pilot treatment unit (PTU) for dairy cattle wastewater (DCW) in relation to its efficiency in reducing the physicochemical and microbiological parameters and possible application of this fertilizer in organic production. A PTU was set up, composed of the following elements: a dung pit of 7.8 m 3 , already in place; a septic tank; a set of anaerobic biological filters comprising an upflow filter and a downward-flow filter filled with fragments PVC corrugated conduit; and two constructed wetland systems (CWSs) of horizontal subsurface flow in two par- allel routes (Routes 1 and 2), controlled by means of a flow rate divider box. Route 1 passed through CWS 1 cultivated with cattail (Typha domingensis) and Route 2 passed through CWS 2 cultivated with vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides). To evaluate the treatment stages, biweekly investigations were carried out to collect effluent samples. The results of moni- toring, in absolute values, were evaluated by means of the medians and variation coefficients and compared by means of Kruskal?Wallis non-parametric test followed by the Student Newman Keuls test. The treatment efficiencies of Routes 1 and 2 were calculated. The influence of vetiver on the removal of nutrients from the DCW was analyzed and the productivity estimate (t.ha ?1 ) was performed. CWS 1 was not able to reduce the organic load indices, but it was able to retain fatty mate- rial and sodium. CWS 2 showed a reduction in nitrogenous forms and also for other nutrients, achieving the greatest removal of sodium and greatest decay of fecal contamination indicators, thermotolerant coliforms (56.13%), and E. coli (46.82%) 650 $aAgricultural wastes 653 $aConstructed wetland 653 $aMicrobiological parameters 653 $aNutrient extraction 653 $aPilot treatment unit 653 $aRemoval of contaminants 700 1 $aSILVA, L. D. B. da 700 1 $aSILVA, J. B. G. 700 1 $aALVES, D. G. 700 1 $aHÜTHER, C. M. 700 1 $aCECCHIN, D. 700 1 $aGUERRA, J. G. M. 700 1 $aSANTOS, L. M. M. 700 1 $aFRANCISCO, J. P. 700 1 $aMELO, A. C. F. de 700 1 $aNASCENTES, A. L. 700 1 $aCALLETI, R. P. K. 773 $tEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research$gv. 30, n.1 2, p. 34775-34792, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|