|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
Data corrente: |
02/12/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
17/03/2016 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, M. D. de; CAMPOS, M. C. S.; PAOLUCCI, E. M.; MANSUR, M. C. D.; HAMILTON, S. K. |
Afiliação: |
MARCIA DIVINA DE OLIVEIRA, CPAP; MÔNICA C. S. CAMPOS, SENAI FIEMG - Campus CETEC; ESTEBAN M. PAOLUCCI, IEGEBA - UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES; MARIA C. D. MANSUR, UFRGS; STEPHEN K. HAMILTON, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. |
Título: |
Colonization and spread of Limnoperna fortunei in South America. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: BOLTOVSKOY, D. (Ed.). Limnoperna fortunei: the ecology, distribution and control of a swiftly spreading invasive fouling mussel. Switzerland: Springer, 2015. p. 333-355. (Invading Nature-Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, 10). |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The invasion of the exotic bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker 1857) in South America started with its introduction, presumably with ballast water from transoceanic ships trading with Southeast Asia, in the Río de la Plata estuary (Argentina) around 1990. From there, it spread swiftly to cover most of the Río de la Plata basin, as well as the basins of Guaíba and Tramandaí (Brazil), Patos?Mirim (Brazil?Uruguay), and Mar Chiquita (central Argentina). These smaller watersheds were most probably colonized as a result of secondary human-mediated introductions from waterbodies of the Río de la Plata basin. L. fortunei is now present in five South American countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Expansion was much faster along navigable waterways, especially the Paraná River and its tributaries (around 250 km/year), and slower elsewhere (Upper Paraguay and Uruguay rivers and their tributaries). Over 20 years after its introduction in South America, new waterbodies are still being colonized by L. fortunei (e.g., the first records of the mussel in the Peixoto and Itapeva lakes, Tramandaí River system, date from 2013). Mussels have not been recorded in a few rivers of the Río de la Plata basin where their survival seems to be limited by excessively high suspended
solid loads or salinities, or by the fact that they periodically dry out (e.g., the rivers Bermejo, Pilcomayo, and Salado del Norte, in north-central Argentina). South American populations display a relatively high genetic differentiation, confirming that geographic spread is strongly dependent on human activities: vessel and barge traffic is the main vector that helps to disperse the mussel locally through upstream ?jumps? of adults attached to ship hulls. Genetic studies also suggest that there have been multiple introductions. By early 2014, L. fortunei had not yet been reported from any of the other major South American watersheds (Amazon, São
Francisco, Orinoco), but colonization of these basins is probably inevitable. Modeling of potential distribution based on habitat fitness indicates that extensive regions could support L. fortunei, including much of lowland South America, southern Mexico, the southeastern USA, Europe, and Africa. MenosThe invasion of the exotic bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker 1857) in South America started with its introduction, presumably with ballast water from transoceanic ships trading with Southeast Asia, in the Río de la Plata estuary (Argentina) around 1990. From there, it spread swiftly to cover most of the Río de la Plata basin, as well as the basins of Guaíba and Tramandaí (Brazil), Patos?Mirim (Brazil?Uruguay), and Mar Chiquita (central Argentina). These smaller watersheds were most probably colonized as a result of secondary human-mediated introductions from waterbodies of the Río de la Plata basin. L. fortunei is now present in five South American countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Expansion was much faster along navigable waterways, especially the Paraná River and its tributaries (around 250 km/year), and slower elsewhere (Upper Paraguay and Uruguay rivers and their tributaries). Over 20 years after its introduction in South America, new waterbodies are still being colonized by L. fortunei (e.g., the first records of the mussel in the Peixoto and Itapeva lakes, Tramandaí River system, date from 2013). Mussels have not been recorded in a few rivers of the Río de la Plata basin where their survival seems to be limited by excessively high suspended
solid loads or salinities, or by the fact that they periodically dry out (e.g., the rivers Bermejo, Pilcomayo, and Salado del Norte, in north-central Argentina). South American populations display a rel... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Biological invasion; Geographic spread; Golden mussel; Limnoperna fortunei; Río de la Plata. |
Thesagro: |
Mexilhão; Molusco. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Argentina; Brazil; Ecological invasion; Invasive species; Mussels; South America. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 03305naa a2200325 a 4500 001 2030249 005 2016-03-17 008 2015 bl --- 0-- u #d 100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. D. de 245 $aColonization and spread of Limnoperna fortunei in South America. 260 $c2015 520 $aThe invasion of the exotic bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker 1857) in South America started with its introduction, presumably with ballast water from transoceanic ships trading with Southeast Asia, in the Río de la Plata estuary (Argentina) around 1990. From there, it spread swiftly to cover most of the Río de la Plata basin, as well as the basins of Guaíba and Tramandaí (Brazil), Patos?Mirim (Brazil?Uruguay), and Mar Chiquita (central Argentina). These smaller watersheds were most probably colonized as a result of secondary human-mediated introductions from waterbodies of the Río de la Plata basin. L. fortunei is now present in five South American countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Expansion was much faster along navigable waterways, especially the Paraná River and its tributaries (around 250 km/year), and slower elsewhere (Upper Paraguay and Uruguay rivers and their tributaries). Over 20 years after its introduction in South America, new waterbodies are still being colonized by L. fortunei (e.g., the first records of the mussel in the Peixoto and Itapeva lakes, Tramandaí River system, date from 2013). Mussels have not been recorded in a few rivers of the Río de la Plata basin where their survival seems to be limited by excessively high suspended solid loads or salinities, or by the fact that they periodically dry out (e.g., the rivers Bermejo, Pilcomayo, and Salado del Norte, in north-central Argentina). South American populations display a relatively high genetic differentiation, confirming that geographic spread is strongly dependent on human activities: vessel and barge traffic is the main vector that helps to disperse the mussel locally through upstream ?jumps? of adults attached to ship hulls. Genetic studies also suggest that there have been multiple introductions. By early 2014, L. fortunei had not yet been reported from any of the other major South American watersheds (Amazon, São Francisco, Orinoco), but colonization of these basins is probably inevitable. Modeling of potential distribution based on habitat fitness indicates that extensive regions could support L. fortunei, including much of lowland South America, southern Mexico, the southeastern USA, Europe, and Africa. 650 $aArgentina 650 $aBrazil 650 $aEcological invasion 650 $aInvasive species 650 $aMussels 650 $aSouth America 650 $aMexilhão 650 $aMolusco 653 $aBiological invasion 653 $aGeographic spread 653 $aGolden mussel 653 $aLimnoperna fortunei 653 $aRío de la Plata 700 1 $aCAMPOS, M. C. S. 700 1 $aPAOLUCCI, E. M. 700 1 $aMANSUR, M. C. D. 700 1 $aHAMILTON, S. K. 773 $tIn: BOLTOVSKOY, D. (Ed.). Limnoperna fortunei: the ecology, distribution and control of a swiftly spreading invasive fouling mussel. Switzerland: Springer, 2015. p. 333-355. (Invading Nature-Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, 10).
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
Data corrente: |
11/03/1996 |
Data da última atualização: |
06/12/2022 |
Autoria: |
BASTOS, T. X.; ROCHA, A. M. A. da; PACHECO, N. A.; SAMPAIO, S. M. N. |
Afiliação: |
THEREZINHA XAVIER BASTOS, CPATU; ANA MARIA AGUILA DA ROCHA, CPATU; NILZA ARAUJO PACHECO, CPATU; SANDRA MARIA NEIVA SAMPAIO, CPATU. |
Título: |
Efeito da remoção da floresta ombrófila sobre o regime pluviométrico no município de Paragominas - PA. |
Ano de publicação: |
1993 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Boletim de Geografia Teorética, v. 23, n. 45/46, p. 85-92, 1993. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Foi analisado o efeito da remoção da cobertura vegetal natural sobre o regime pluviométrico, no município de Paragominas, no Estado do Pará, que apresenta cerca de 34% de área desmaiada para atender as atividades ligadas. principalmente, a exploração madeireira e agropecuária. e a expansão urbana. Os resultados obtidos, ainda que preliminares, indicam que embora as chuvas na área de estudo apresentem grande flutuação anual, não há evidencia científica de que esteja ocorrendo mudança no regime de chuvas. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Flutuação climática; Land using; Rainfall variability. |
Thesagro: |
Desmatamento; Impacto Ambiental; Mudança Climática; Uso da Terra. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
climate change; deforestation; environmental impact. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/100190/1/0921.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01373naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1397241 005 2022-12-06 008 1993 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aBASTOS, T. X. 245 $aEfeito da remoção da floresta ombrófila sobre o regime pluviométrico no município de Paragominas - PA.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c1993 520 $aFoi analisado o efeito da remoção da cobertura vegetal natural sobre o regime pluviométrico, no município de Paragominas, no Estado do Pará, que apresenta cerca de 34% de área desmaiada para atender as atividades ligadas. principalmente, a exploração madeireira e agropecuária. e a expansão urbana. Os resultados obtidos, ainda que preliminares, indicam que embora as chuvas na área de estudo apresentem grande flutuação anual, não há evidencia científica de que esteja ocorrendo mudança no regime de chuvas. 650 $aclimate change 650 $adeforestation 650 $aenvironmental impact 650 $aDesmatamento 650 $aImpacto Ambiental 650 $aMudança Climática 650 $aUso da Terra 653 $aFlutuação climática 653 $aLand using 653 $aRainfall variability 700 1 $aROCHA, A. M. A. da 700 1 $aPACHECO, N. A. 700 1 $aSAMPAIO, S. M. N. 773 $tBoletim de Geografia Teorética$gv. 23, n. 45/46, p. 85-92, 1993.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|