| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 645 | |
| 144. |  | BLIND, A. D.; VALENTE, M. S. F.; LOPES, M. T. G.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de. Estimativa de parâmetros genéticos, análise de trilha e seleção em bucha vegetal para caracteres agronômicos. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, Recife, v. 13, n. 2, e5522, 2018. 8 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| 160. | | SANTOS, V. S. dos; MARTINS FILHO, S.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de. Uma aplicação do modelo de sobrevivência de Cox na seleção genômica ampla de suínos. Revista Matemática e Estatística em foco, v. 1, n. 2, 2013. Edição especial dos anais do Encontro Mineiro de Estatística, 12., 2013, Uberlândia. Resumo.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 645 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/11/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/11/2011 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
VIANA, J. M. S.; FARIA, V. R.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
José Marcelo Soriano Viana, UFV; Vinícius Ribeiro Faria, UFV; Fabyano Fonseca e Silva, UFV; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF. |
|
Título: |
Best linear unbiased prediction and family selection in crop species. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Science, v. 51, n. 6, p. 2371-2381, Nov./Dec. 2011. |
|
DOI: |
10.2135/cropsci2011.03.0153 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) is the method primarily used for genetic evaluation in animal and forest species breeding. The objective was to present theory and application of BLUP in family selection. Statistical models aim to predict the breeding values of parents of half-sib and inbred families and the individual or average additive values of parents of full-sib families. We analyzed the expansion volume (EV) and grain yield of half- and full-sib families and of inbred progeny from the Viçosa popcorn {Zea mays L. subsp. mays [syn. Zea mays L. subsp. everta (Sturtev.) Zhuk.]} population in two selection cycles. The noninbred families were evaluated in a 14 by 14 simple lattice, and the inbred progeny were assessed in the incomplete block design. The additive-dominant model was fi tted for yield of full-sib families of the second cycle and across generations for yield of full-sib families and EV of inbred progeny. Additive × additive epistasis was not signifi cant for EV and yield of half-sib families. Although the predictions of breeding values in the additive and additive-dominant models are positively correlated, different sets of parents were included in the top 10% of breeding values from the two models. Therefore, the additive-dominant model should be fi tted wherever possible. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
BLUP; Family selection. |
|
Thesagro: |
Seleção. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01916naa a2200205 a 4500
001 1906160
005 2011-11-17
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2011.03.0153$2DOI
100 1 $aVIANA, J. M. S.
245 $aBest linear unbiased prediction and family selection in crop species.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2011
520 $aBest linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) is the method primarily used for genetic evaluation in animal and forest species breeding. The objective was to present theory and application of BLUP in family selection. Statistical models aim to predict the breeding values of parents of half-sib and inbred families and the individual or average additive values of parents of full-sib families. We analyzed the expansion volume (EV) and grain yield of half- and full-sib families and of inbred progeny from the Viçosa popcorn {Zea mays L. subsp. mays [syn. Zea mays L. subsp. everta (Sturtev.) Zhuk.]} population in two selection cycles. The noninbred families were evaluated in a 14 by 14 simple lattice, and the inbred progeny were assessed in the incomplete block design. The additive-dominant model was fi tted for yield of full-sib families of the second cycle and across generations for yield of full-sib families and EV of inbred progeny. Additive × additive epistasis was not signifi cant for EV and yield of half-sib families. Although the predictions of breeding values in the additive and additive-dominant models are positively correlated, different sets of parents were included in the top 10% of breeding values from the two models. Therefore, the additive-dominant model should be fi tted wherever possible.
650 $aSeleção
653 $aBLUP
653 $aFamily selection
700 1 $aFARIA, V. R.
700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. e
700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de
773 $tCrop Science$gv. 51, n. 6, p. 2371-2381, Nov./Dec. 2011.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
