| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 82 | |
| 63. |  | MORAES, M. C. M. M. de; CHEN, R. F. F.; ROSSONI, A. L.; PRADO, W. P. B. S. do; REIS, J. C. dos; FERREIRA, D. L. Nova perspectiva de custo de produção na agropecuária: proposta de avaliação para sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta (iLPF) In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CUSTOS, 21., 2014, Natal. Gestão de Custos no Brasil Pós-Copa 2014 e Pré-Olimpíadas 2016: Anais... Natal, RN: CBC, 2014. 13 p. 13| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|    |
| 64. | | REIS, J. C. dos; KAMOI, M. Y. T.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e; MICHETTI, M.; GIMENEZ, M. A.; MOMBACH, M. A.; SILVA, N. M. F. da. Aspectos econômicos da recuperação de pastagens na Amazônia. In: DIAS-FILHO, M. B.; ANDRADE, C. M. S. de (Ed.). Recuperação de pastagens degradadas na Amazônia. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. Cap. 10. p. 385-413.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|  |
| 65. | | CAVALCANTE, G. M.; FERRAZ, D.; REIS, J. C. dos; DALFOVO, W. T.; REZENDE, F. A. de; MORAES, M. C. M. M. de. Avaliação dos aspectos econômicos para o uso do biocarvão como condicionador de solo em Mato Grosso IN: Semana Acadêmica - Sinop/2014, 1., 2014,Sinop, MT. Resumos... I Semana Acadêmica - Sinop/2014, III Jornada Científica da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, Seminário Integrador PIBID e Tutoria, Mostra de Ensino e Extensão. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2014. p. 131 1| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 66. | | OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de; MONTEIRO, R. A. C.; PERES, A. A. C.; REIS, J. C. dos; MORAES, M. C. M. M. de; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. Análise econômico-financeira de sistemas integrados para a produção de novilhas leiteiras. Archivos de zootecnia, v. 65, n. 250, p. 203-212, jun. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 67. | | KAMOI, M. Y. T.; MICHETTI, M.; REIS, J. C. dos; WRUCK, F. J.; NASCIMENTO, M. C.; SILVA, L. A. A. da. Estudo de caso: desempenho econômico de sistemas iLPF no estado do Mato Grosso. SKORUPA, L. A.; MANZATTO, C. V. Avaliação da adoção de sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta (ILPF) no Brasil. In: SKORUPA, L. A.; MANZATTO, C. V. (Ed.). Sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta no Brasil: estratégias regionais de transferência de tecnologia, avaliação da adoção e de impactos. Brasília: DF, Embrapa, 2019. p. 425-444.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 68. | | GIL, J. D. B.; GARRETT, R. D.; ROTZ, A.; DAIOGLOU, V.; VALENTIM, J. F.; PIRES, G. F.; COSTA, M. H.; LOPES, L. B.; REIS, J. C. dos. Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Environmental Research Letters, v. 13, n. 6, 064025, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 69. | | ANSOLIN, R. D.; TIMOFEICZYK JUNIOR, R.; SILVA, J. C. G. L. da; MICHETTI, M.; KAMOI, M. Y. T.; REIS, J. C. dos. Strategic diagnosis of livestock-forest integration systems in northern mato grosso. Floresta, v. 50, n. 1, p.1001-1010, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 70. | | HOOGERHEIDE, E. S. S.; TIAGO, A. V.; BOTELHO, S. de C. C.; OLIVEIRA, S. S.; BARELLI, M. A. A.; REIS, J. C. dos. Uso da mandioca na baixada cuiabana. In: ENCONTRO DE CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIAS AGROSSUSTENTÁVEIS; JORNADA CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA AGROSSILVIPASTORIL, 6., 2017, Sinop, MT. Resumos... Sinop, MT: Embrapa Agrossilpastoril, 2017. p. 196-198.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 71. | | MAEDA, E. E.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; BAKER, J. C. A.; BALBINO, L. C.; MOURA, Y. M. de; NOBRE, A. D.; NUNES, M. H.; SILVA JUNIOR, C. H. L.; REIS, J. C. dos. Land use still matters after deforestation. Communications Earth & Environment, v. 4, 2023. 4 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| 72. | | REIS, J. C. dos; RODRIGUES, G. S.; BARROS, I. de; RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.; GARRETT, R. D.; VALENTIM, J. F.; KAMOI, M. Y. T.; MICHETTI, M.; WRUCK, F. J.; RODRIGUES FILHO, S.; PIMENTEL, P. E. O.; SMUKLER, S. Integrated crop-livestock systems: a sustainable land-use alternative for food production in the Brazilian Cerrado and Amazon. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 283, 124580, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Gado de Leite; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 73. | | REIS, J. C. dos; KAMOI, M. Y. T.; LATORRACA, D.; CHEN, R. F. F.; MICHETTI, M.; WRUCK, F. J.; GARRETT, R. D.; VALENTIM, J. F.; RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.; RODRIGUES FILHO, S. Assessing the economic viability of integrated crop-livestock systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, v. 35, n. 6, p. 631-642, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 74. | | LOPES, L. B.; CARNEVALLI, R. A.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de; DOMIT, L. A.; SILVEIRA, B. P. e; REIS, J. C. dos; MORAES, M. C. M. M. de; ANTONIO, D. B. A. Capacitação continuada em pecuária leiteira para técnicos do estado do Mato Grosso: fase I: levantamento de demandas e treinamento básico. In: CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DO LEITE, 10.; WORKSHOP DE POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS, 10.; SIMPÓSIO DE SUSTENTABILIDADE DA ATIVIDADE LEITEIRA, 11., 2011, Maceió. Juiz de Fora: Embrapa Gado de Leite, 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 75. | | GARRETT, R. D.; RYSCHAWY, J.; BELL, L. W.; CORTNER, O.; FERREIRA, J. N.; GARIK, A. V. N.; GIL, J. D. B.; KLERKX, L.; MORAINE, M.; PETERSON, C. A.; REIS, J. C. dos; VALENTIM, J. F. Drivers of decoupling and recoupling of crop and livestock systems at farm and territorial scales. Ecology and Society, v. 25, n. 1, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 76. | | REIS, J. C. dos; RODRIGUES, G. S.; BARROS, I. de; RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.; GARRETT, R. D.; VALENTIM, J. F.; KAMOI, M. Y. T.; MICHETTI, M.; WRUCK, F. J.; RODRIGUES-FILHO, S. Fuzzy logic indicators for the assessment of farming sustainability strategies in a tropical agricultural frontier. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, v. 43, 2023. 18 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Gado de Leite; Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 77. | | REIS, J. C. dos; BONACIN, R.; CORREA, A.; PEREIRA, F. E. D.; PIEROZZI JUNIOR, I.; TORQUATO, S. A.; CARDOSO JUNIOR, J. L.; JESUS, K. R. E. de; ARAUJO, O. F. N. A framework for designing cognitive assistants to support agricultural production systems. In: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES, 27., 2018, Paris. Infrastructure for collaborative enterprises: proceedings. Paris: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2018. p. 281-284.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 78. | | REIS, J. C. dos; BONACIN, R.; CORREA, A.; PEREIRA, F. E. D.; PIEROZZI JUNIOR, I.; TORQUATO, S. A.; CARDOSO JUNIOR, J. L.; JESUS, K. R. E. de; ARAUJO, O. F. N. A framework for designing cognitive assistants to support agricultural production systems. In: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES, 27., 2018, Paris. Infrastructure for collaborative enterprises: proceedings. Paris: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2018. p. 281-284. WETICE 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| 79. | | NEWTON, P.; GOMEZ, A. E. A.; JUNG, S.; KELLY, T.; MENDES, T. de A.; RASMUSSEN, L. V.; REIS, J. C. dos; RODRIGUES, R. de A. R.; TIPPER, R.; HORST, D. van der; WATKINS, C. Overcoming barriers to low carbon agriculture and forest restoration in Brazil: The Rural Sustentável project. World Development Perspectives, v. 4, p. 5-7, Dec. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 80. | | HOOGERHEIDE, E. S. S.; BARELLI, M. A. A.; REIS, J. C. dos; DUARTE, G.; BOTELHO, S. de C. C.; OLIVEIRA, S. S.; OLIVEIRA, O. S. de; SILVA, L. G. de O. O uso da mandioca e caracterização do sistema de produção da farinha na Baixada Cuiabana, Mato Grosso. In: FARIAS NETO, A. L. de; NASCIMENTO, A. F. do; ROSSONI, A. L.; MAGALHÃES, C. A. de S.; ITUASSU, D. R.; HOOGERHEIDE, E. S. S.; IKEDA, F. S.; FERNANDES JUNIOR, F.; FARIA, G. R.; ISERNHAGEN, I.; VENDRUSCULO, L. G.; MORALES, M. M.; CARNEVALLI, R. A. (Ed.). Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril: primeiras contribuições para o desenvolvimento de uma agropecuária sustentável. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. pt. 8, cap. 3, p. 564-567.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 82 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/06/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/02/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GIL, J. D. B.; GARRETT, R. D.; ROTZ, A.; DAIOGLOU, V.; VALENTIM, J. F.; PIRES, G. F.; COSTA, M. H.; LOPES, L. B.; REIS, J. C. dos. |
|
Afiliação: |
JULIANA DIAS BERNARDES GIL, WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY; RACHAEL D. GARRETT, BOSTON UNIVERSITY; ALAN ROTZ, USDA-ARS; VASSILIS DAIOGLOU, UTRECHT UNIVERSITY; JUDSON FERREIRA VALENTIM, CPAF-AC; GABRIELLE F. PIRES, UFV; MARCOS H. COSTA, UFV; LUCIANO BASTOS LOPES, CPAMT; JULIO CESAR DOS REIS, CPAMT. |
|
Título: |
Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Research Letters, v. 13, n. 6, 064025, 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Low productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity and financial returns). All systems suffered productivity and profitability losses under severe climate change, highlighting the need for climate smart agricultural development strategies in the region. By underscoring the economic feasibility of improving the performance of cattle systems, and by quantifying the tradeoffs of each option, our results are useful for directing agricultural and climate policy. MenosLow productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultura sustentable; Deforestación; Efecto invernadero; Ganado bovino; Pecuária extensiva; Reducción de riesgos; Sistemas agrícolas integrados. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Sustentável; Criação Extensiva; Desmatamento; Efeito Estufa; Impacto Ambiental; Pecuária; Redução; Sistema de Pastejo. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agricultural management models; Amazonia; Cattle; Climate; Climate models; Deforestation; Environmental impact; Environmental sustainability; Extensive farming; Greenhouse effect; Greenhouse gas emissions; Integrated agricultural systems; Integrated crop management; Land; Livestock; Pastures; Risk reduction; Sustainable agricultural intensification; Sustainable agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/192496/1/2018-cpamt-luciano-lopes-tradeoffs-quest-climate-smart-agricultural-intensification-mato-grosso.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/178393/1/26625.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03719naa a2200625 a 4500
001 2105798
005 2019-02-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGIL, J. D. B.
245 $aTradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aLow productivity cattle ranching, with its linkages to rural poverty, deforestation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains one of the largest sustainability challenges in Brazil and has impacts worldwide. There is a nearly universal call to intensify extensive beef cattle production systems to spare land for crop production and nature and to meet Brazil's Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to reducing global climate change. However, different interventions aimed at the intensification of livestock systems in Brazil may involve substantial social and environmental tradeoffs. Here we examine these tradeoffs using a whole-farm model calibrated for the Brazilian agricultural frontier state of Mato Grosso, one of the largest soybean and beef cattle production regions in the world. Specifically, we compare the costs and benefits of a typical extensive, continuously grazed cattle system relative to a specialized soybean production system and two improved cattle management strategies (rotational grazing and integrated soybean-cattle) under different climate scenarios. We found clear tradeoffs in GHG and nitrogen emissions, climate resilience, and water and energy use across these systems. Relative to continuously grazed or rotationally grazed cattle systems, the integreated soybean-cattle system showed higher food production and lower GHG emissions per unit of human digestible protein, as well as increased resilience under climate change (both in terms of productivity and financial returns). All systems suffered productivity and profitability losses under severe climate change, highlighting the need for climate smart agricultural development strategies in the region. By underscoring the economic feasibility of improving the performance of cattle systems, and by quantifying the tradeoffs of each option, our results are useful for directing agricultural and climate policy.
650 $aAgricultural management models
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aCattle
650 $aClimate
650 $aClimate models
650 $aDeforestation
650 $aEnvironmental impact
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aExtensive farming
650 $aGreenhouse effect
650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions
650 $aIntegrated agricultural systems
650 $aIntegrated crop management
650 $aLand
650 $aLivestock
650 $aPastures
650 $aRisk reduction
650 $aSustainable agricultural intensification
650 $aSustainable agriculture
650 $aAgricultura Sustentável
650 $aCriação Extensiva
650 $aDesmatamento
650 $aEfeito Estufa
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
650 $aPecuária
650 $aRedução
650 $aSistema de Pastejo
653 $aAgricultura sustentable
653 $aDeforestación
653 $aEfecto invernadero
653 $aGanado bovino
653 $aPecuária extensiva
653 $aReducción de riesgos
653 $aSistemas agrícolas integrados
700 1 $aGARRETT, R. D.
700 1 $aROTZ, A.
700 1 $aDAIOGLOU, V.
700 1 $aVALENTIM, J. F.
700 1 $aPIRES, G. F.
700 1 $aCOSTA, M. H.
700 1 $aLOPES, L. B.
700 1 $aREIS, J. C. dos
773 $tEnvironmental Research Letters$gv. 13, n. 6, 064025, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
