| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/11/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/06/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
BRANDÃO, H. M.; MARCONCINI, J. M.; SILVA, S. R. da; BARBOSA, N. R.; TRALDI, A. S.; MADUREIRA, E. H. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOSE MANOEL MARCONCINI, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
A potential device for oral vaccination of ruminants |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOOD AND AGRICULTURE APPLICATIONS OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES - NanoAgri, 2010, São Pedro, SP. [Anais…] São Pedro: Aptor Software, 2010. Editors: Caue Ribeiro, Odílio Benedito Garrido de Assis, Luiz Henrique Capparelli Mattoso, Sérgio Mascarenhas. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Evento. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/84671/1/Proci-10.00089.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00706nam a2200169 a 4500
001 1866188
005 2013-06-24
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBRANDÃO, H. M.
245 $aA potential device for oral vaccination of ruminants
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOOD AND AGRICULTURE APPLICATIONS OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES - NanoAgri, 2010, São Pedro, SP. [Anais…] São Pedro: Aptor Software, 2010. Editors: Caue Ribeiro, Odílio Benedito Garrido de Assis, Luiz Henrique Capparelli Mattoso, Sérgio Mascarenhas.$c2010
653 $aEvento
700 1 $aMARCONCINI, J. M.
700 1 $aSILVA, S. R. da
700 1 $aBARBOSA, N. R.
700 1 $aTRALDI, A. S.
700 1 $aMADUREIRA, E. H.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/06/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/03/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
HEINEMANN, A. B.; RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, J.; SOUZA, T. L. P. O.; DIDONET, A. D.; DI STEFANO, J. G.; BOOTE, K. J.; JARVIS, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALEXANDRE BRYAN HEINEMANN, CNPAF; JULIAN RAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, CIAT; THIAGO LIVIO PESSOA OLIV DE SOUZA, CNPAF; AGOSTINHO DIRCEU DIDONET, CNPAF; JOSE GERALDO DI STEFANO, CNPA; KENNETH J. BOOTE, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, Gainesville-FL; ANDY JARVIS, CIAT. |
|
Título: |
Drought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v. 225, p. 57-74, Sept. 2016. |
|
DOI: |
10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.010 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Common bean production in Goiás, Brazil is concentrated in the same geographic area, but spread acrossthree distinct growing seasons, namely, wet, dry and winter. In the wet and dry seasons, common beansare grown under rainfed conditions, whereas the winter sowing is fully irrigated. The conventional breed-ing program performs all varietal selection stages solely in the winter season, with rainfed environmentsbeing incorporated in the breeding scheme only through the multi environment trials (METs) wherebasically only yield is recorded. As yield is the result of many interacting processes, it is challengingto determine the events (abiotic or biotic) associated with yield reduction in the rainfed environments(wet and dry seasons). To improve our understanding of rainfed dry bean production so as to produceinformation that can assist breeders in their efforts to develop stress-tolerant, high-yielding germplasm,we characterized environments by integrating weather, soil, crop and management factors using cropsimulation models. Crop simulations based on two commonly grown cultivars (Pérola and BRS Radi-ante) and statistical analyses of simulated yield suggest that both rainfed seasons, wet and dry, can bedivided in two groups of environments: highly favorable environment and favorable environment. Forthe wet and dry seasons, the highly favorable environment represents 44% and 58% of production area,respectively. Across all rainfed environment groups, terminal and/or reproductive drought stress occursin roughly one fourth of the seasons (23.9% for Pérola and 24.7% for Radiante), with drought being mostlimiting in the favorable environment group in the dry TPE. Based on our results, we argue that eventhough drought-tailoring might not be warranted, the common bean breeding program should adapttheir selection practices to the range of stresses occurring in the rainfed TPEs to select genotypes moresuitable for these environments. MenosCommon bean production in Goiás, Brazil is concentrated in the same geographic area, but spread acrossthree distinct growing seasons, namely, wet, dry and winter. In the wet and dry seasons, common beansare grown under rainfed conditions, whereas the winter sowing is fully irrigated. The conventional breed-ing program performs all varietal selection stages solely in the winter season, with rainfed environmentsbeing incorporated in the breeding scheme only through the multi environment trials (METs) wherebasically only yield is recorded. As yield is the result of many interacting processes, it is challengingto determine the events (abiotic or biotic) associated with yield reduction in the rainfed environments(wet and dry seasons). To improve our understanding of rainfed dry bean production so as to produceinformation that can assist breeders in their efforts to develop stress-tolerant, high-yielding germplasm,we characterized environments by integrating weather, soil, crop and management factors using cropsimulation models. Crop simulations based on two commonly grown cultivars (Pérola and BRS Radi-ante) and statistical analyses of simulated yield suggest that both rainfed seasons, wet and dry, can bedivided in two groups of environments: highly favorable environment and favorable environment. Forthe wet and dry seasons, the highly favorable environment represents 44% and 58% of production area,respectively. Across all rainfed environment groups, terminal and/or reproductive ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Environment classification; Melhoramento genético. |
|
Thesagro: |
Deficiência hídrica; Feijão; Phaseolus vulgaris; Relação água-planta. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Breeding; Models; Plant-water relations. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/144224/1/CNPAF-2016-abh.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02899naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2046621
005 2017-03-07
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.010$2DOI
100 1 $aHEINEMANN, A. B.
245 $aDrought impact on rainfed common bean production areas in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aCommon bean production in Goiás, Brazil is concentrated in the same geographic area, but spread acrossthree distinct growing seasons, namely, wet, dry and winter. In the wet and dry seasons, common beansare grown under rainfed conditions, whereas the winter sowing is fully irrigated. The conventional breed-ing program performs all varietal selection stages solely in the winter season, with rainfed environmentsbeing incorporated in the breeding scheme only through the multi environment trials (METs) wherebasically only yield is recorded. As yield is the result of many interacting processes, it is challengingto determine the events (abiotic or biotic) associated with yield reduction in the rainfed environments(wet and dry seasons). To improve our understanding of rainfed dry bean production so as to produceinformation that can assist breeders in their efforts to develop stress-tolerant, high-yielding germplasm,we characterized environments by integrating weather, soil, crop and management factors using cropsimulation models. Crop simulations based on two commonly grown cultivars (Pérola and BRS Radi-ante) and statistical analyses of simulated yield suggest that both rainfed seasons, wet and dry, can bedivided in two groups of environments: highly favorable environment and favorable environment. Forthe wet and dry seasons, the highly favorable environment represents 44% and 58% of production area,respectively. Across all rainfed environment groups, terminal and/or reproductive drought stress occursin roughly one fourth of the seasons (23.9% for Pérola and 24.7% for Radiante), with drought being mostlimiting in the favorable environment group in the dry TPE. Based on our results, we argue that eventhough drought-tailoring might not be warranted, the common bean breeding program should adapttheir selection practices to the range of stresses occurring in the rainfed TPEs to select genotypes moresuitable for these environments.
650 $aBreeding
650 $aModels
650 $aPlant-water relations
650 $aDeficiência hídrica
650 $aFeijão
650 $aPhaseolus vulgaris
650 $aRelação água-planta
653 $aEnvironment classification
653 $aMelhoramento genético
700 1 $aRAMIREZ-VILLEGAS, J.
700 1 $aSOUZA, T. L. P. O.
700 1 $aDIDONET, A. D.
700 1 $aDI STEFANO, J. G.
700 1 $aBOOTE, K. J.
700 1 $aJARVIS, A.
773 $tAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam$gv. 225, p. 57-74, Sept. 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
