| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 4.132 | |
| Registros recuperados : 4.132 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpao.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/12/1995 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/06/2011 |
|
Autoria: |
FLESCH, R. D. |
|
Título: |
Wheat-soybean relay intercropping: temporal and spatial effects. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1994 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
1994. |
|
Páginas: |
113 f. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês
Português |
|
Notas: |
Dissertation (Doctor of Physiology - Crop Production and Physiology) - Iowa State University, Ames. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Relay intercropping soybean into wheat has great potential in Iowa by allowing two harvests on the same land area in the same year. Wheat is planted in September and soybean is interseeded into the standing wheat in May. This system can be important for Iowa by diversifying production, increasing farm productivity, and reducing soil erosion. A three year experiment was conducted near Boone, IA, to determine the effect of soybeans planting dates and spatial arrangements on wheat and soybean in a relay intercropping system, and its relative agronomic efficiency. The experimental design was a split-plot with the main plots (planting dates) arranged in randomized complete blocks with three replications of each treatment. The soybean planting dates were: pre-heading=PD1, heading=PD2, and post-heading=PD3. Five spatial arrangements (sub-plots) were used: 1W:1S (one wheat row alternated with one soybean row), 2W:1S, 2W:2S, 3W:2S, and 4W:3S. Wheat yield was reduced on average by 33% with soybean interplanting, and was proportionally lower than the reduction of wheat plant population during implementation of the skip-row pattern (33 to 50 %). Relay intercropped soybean produced 73 % of the sole crop soybean, indicating skip-row patterns are a good alternative for higher soybean yield. Soybean planting at wheat pre-heading or at heading was the best alternative for this system. Arrangements producing the best soybean yields were not good wheat producers and vice-versa, suggesting that improvements in the yield of one crop will negatively affect the yield of the companion crop in a wheat-soybean relay intercropping system. For soybean oriented producers, 2W:2S, 3W:2S and 4W:3S are good choices due to the high soybean grain yield. Arrangement 1W:1S was intermediate for soybean and wheat yields. A land equivalent ratio (LER) of 1.46, on average, demonstrated the agronomic efficiency of relay intercropping over sole cropping. MenosRelay intercropping soybean into wheat has great potential in Iowa by allowing two harvests on the same land area in the same year. Wheat is planted in September and soybean is interseeded into the standing wheat in May. This system can be important for Iowa by diversifying production, increasing farm productivity, and reducing soil erosion. A three year experiment was conducted near Boone, IA, to determine the effect of soybeans planting dates and spatial arrangements on wheat and soybean in a relay intercropping system, and its relative agronomic efficiency. The experimental design was a split-plot with the main plots (planting dates) arranged in randomized complete blocks with three replications of each treatment. The soybean planting dates were: pre-heading=PD1, heading=PD2, and post-heading=PD3. Five spatial arrangements (sub-plots) were used: 1W:1S (one wheat row alternated with one soybean row), 2W:1S, 2W:2S, 3W:2S, and 4W:3S. Wheat yield was reduced on average by 33% with soybean interplanting, and was proportionally lower than the reduction of wheat plant population during implementation of the skip-row pattern (33 to 50 %). Relay intercropped soybean produced 73 % of the sole crop soybean, indicating skip-row patterns are a good alternative for higher soybean yield. Soybean planting at wheat pre-heading or at heading was the best alternative for this system. Arrangements producing the best soybean yields were not good wheat producers and vice-versa, suggesting that... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Consorciacao; EUA; Soybean; USA. |
|
Thesagro: |
Glycine Max; Soja; Trigo; Triticum Aestivum. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
intercropping; Iowa; wheat. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02633nam a2200265 a 4500
001 1241812
005 2011-06-14
008 1994 bl uuuu m 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFLESCH, R. D.
245 $aWheat-soybean relay intercropping$btemporal and spatial effects.
260 $a1994.$c1994
300 $a113 f.
500 $aDissertation (Doctor of Physiology - Crop Production and Physiology) - Iowa State University, Ames.
520 $aRelay intercropping soybean into wheat has great potential in Iowa by allowing two harvests on the same land area in the same year. Wheat is planted in September and soybean is interseeded into the standing wheat in May. This system can be important for Iowa by diversifying production, increasing farm productivity, and reducing soil erosion. A three year experiment was conducted near Boone, IA, to determine the effect of soybeans planting dates and spatial arrangements on wheat and soybean in a relay intercropping system, and its relative agronomic efficiency. The experimental design was a split-plot with the main plots (planting dates) arranged in randomized complete blocks with three replications of each treatment. The soybean planting dates were: pre-heading=PD1, heading=PD2, and post-heading=PD3. Five spatial arrangements (sub-plots) were used: 1W:1S (one wheat row alternated with one soybean row), 2W:1S, 2W:2S, 3W:2S, and 4W:3S. Wheat yield was reduced on average by 33% with soybean interplanting, and was proportionally lower than the reduction of wheat plant population during implementation of the skip-row pattern (33 to 50 %). Relay intercropped soybean produced 73 % of the sole crop soybean, indicating skip-row patterns are a good alternative for higher soybean yield. Soybean planting at wheat pre-heading or at heading was the best alternative for this system. Arrangements producing the best soybean yields were not good wheat producers and vice-versa, suggesting that improvements in the yield of one crop will negatively affect the yield of the companion crop in a wheat-soybean relay intercropping system. For soybean oriented producers, 2W:2S, 3W:2S and 4W:3S are good choices due to the high soybean grain yield. Arrangement 1W:1S was intermediate for soybean and wheat yields. A land equivalent ratio (LER) of 1.46, on average, demonstrated the agronomic efficiency of relay intercropping over sole cropping.
650 $aintercropping
650 $aIowa
650 $awheat
650 $aGlycine Max
650 $aSoja
650 $aTrigo
650 $aTriticum Aestivum
653 $aConsorciacao
653 $aEUA
653 $aSoybean
653 $aUSA
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
