| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/11/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/08/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MIRANDA, M.; SUN, X.; FERENCE, C.; PLOTTO, A.; BAI, J.; WOOD, D.; ASSIS, O. B. G. de; FERREIRA, M. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
ODILIO BENEDITO GARRIDO DE ASSIS, CNPDIA; MARCOS DAVID FERREIRA, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
Nano- and Micro- Carnauba Wax Emulsions versus Shellac Protective Coatings on Postharvest Citrus Quality. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,v. 146, n. 1, 2021. |
|
Páginas: |
40-49 |
|
ISSN: |
0003-1062 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS04972-20 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Coatings are generally applied to fruit as microemulsions, but nanoemulsions are still experimental. ‘Nova’ mandarins (Citrus reticulata) were coated with shellac or carnauba (Copernica cerifera) microemulsions or an experimental carnauba nanoemulsion; these were compared with an uncoated control during storage for 7 days at 20 °C. Coatings were also tested on ‘Unique’ tangors (C. reticulata × C. sinensis) stored for 14 days at 10 °C followed by a simulated marketing period of 7 days at 20 °C. Fruit quality evaluations included weight loss, gloss, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), pH, SS/TA ratio, internal CO2, O2, fruit juice ethanol, and other aroma volatile content. Sensory visual shine and tangerine (C. reticulata) flavor rank tests after storage were conducted, followed by an off-flavor rating. The carnauba waxes resulted in less weight loss compared with the uncoated control and shellac coating during both experiments. There were no differences in gloss measurements of ‘Nova’ mandarins; however, shellac-coated fruit ranked highest for shine in a sensory test. For ‘Unique’ tangors, initially, shellac showed the highest gloss (shine) measurement; however, at the end of storage, the nanoemulsion exhibited the highest gloss, although it was not different from that of the microemulsion. Similarly, after storage, the nanoemulsion ranked highest for visual shine, although it was not different from that of the microemulsion. There were only minor differences in SS, TA, pH, and SS/TA among treatments. The internal CO2 gas concentration and juice ethanol content generally increased and internal O2 decreased during storage. The highest levels of CO2 and ethanol were found for the shellac treatment, as was the lowest O2, indicating anaerobic respiration. There were only minor differences among the other coating treatments; however, they were only sometimes different from those of the control, which generally had the highest O2, lowest CO2, and lowest ethanol. Shellac and the carnauba microemulsion also altered the volatile profile more than the control and the nanoemulsion did, especially for ‘Unique’ tangors. For ‘Unique’ tangors, the control and nanoemulsion ranked highest for tangerine flavor and had the least off-flavor at the end of storage. Among the coatings tested, the carnauba emulsions demonstrated less water loss, imparted more sustainable gloss, and caused less ethanol production than shellac, with the nanoemulsion exhibiting higher gloss measurements, less modifications of the atmosphere and volatile profile, and, consequently, better flavor compared with the microemulsion. MenosCoatings are generally applied to fruit as microemulsions, but nanoemulsions are still experimental. ‘Nova’ mandarins (Citrus reticulata) were coated with shellac or carnauba (Copernica cerifera) microemulsions or an experimental carnauba nanoemulsion; these were compared with an uncoated control during storage for 7 days at 20 °C. Coatings were also tested on ‘Unique’ tangors (C. reticulata × C. sinensis) stored for 14 days at 10 °C followed by a simulated marketing period of 7 days at 20 °C. Fruit quality evaluations included weight loss, gloss, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), pH, SS/TA ratio, internal CO2, O2, fruit juice ethanol, and other aroma volatile content. Sensory visual shine and tangerine (C. reticulata) flavor rank tests after storage were conducted, followed by an off-flavor rating. The carnauba waxes resulted in less weight loss compared with the uncoated control and shellac coating during both experiments. There were no differences in gloss measurements of ‘Nova’ mandarins; however, shellac-coated fruit ranked highest for shine in a sensory test. For ‘Unique’ tangors, initially, shellac showed the highest gloss (shine) measurement; however, at the end of storage, the nanoemulsion exhibited the highest gloss, although it was not different from that of the microemulsion. Similarly, after storage, the nanoemulsion ranked highest for visual shine, although it was not different from that of the microemulsion. There were only minor differences in SS,... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Aroma volatiles; Mandarin; Tangor. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/218376/1/P-Nano-and-Micro-Carnauba-Wax-Emulsions.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03477naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2127218
005 2022-08-16
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0003-1062
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS04972-20$2DOI
100 1 $aMIRANDA, M.
245 $aNano- and Micro- Carnauba Wax Emulsions versus Shellac Protective Coatings on Postharvest Citrus Quality.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a40-49
520 $aCoatings are generally applied to fruit as microemulsions, but nanoemulsions are still experimental. ‘Nova’ mandarins (Citrus reticulata) were coated with shellac or carnauba (Copernica cerifera) microemulsions or an experimental carnauba nanoemulsion; these were compared with an uncoated control during storage for 7 days at 20 °C. Coatings were also tested on ‘Unique’ tangors (C. reticulata × C. sinensis) stored for 14 days at 10 °C followed by a simulated marketing period of 7 days at 20 °C. Fruit quality evaluations included weight loss, gloss, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), pH, SS/TA ratio, internal CO2, O2, fruit juice ethanol, and other aroma volatile content. Sensory visual shine and tangerine (C. reticulata) flavor rank tests after storage were conducted, followed by an off-flavor rating. The carnauba waxes resulted in less weight loss compared with the uncoated control and shellac coating during both experiments. There were no differences in gloss measurements of ‘Nova’ mandarins; however, shellac-coated fruit ranked highest for shine in a sensory test. For ‘Unique’ tangors, initially, shellac showed the highest gloss (shine) measurement; however, at the end of storage, the nanoemulsion exhibited the highest gloss, although it was not different from that of the microemulsion. Similarly, after storage, the nanoemulsion ranked highest for visual shine, although it was not different from that of the microemulsion. There were only minor differences in SS, TA, pH, and SS/TA among treatments. The internal CO2 gas concentration and juice ethanol content generally increased and internal O2 decreased during storage. The highest levels of CO2 and ethanol were found for the shellac treatment, as was the lowest O2, indicating anaerobic respiration. There were only minor differences among the other coating treatments; however, they were only sometimes different from those of the control, which generally had the highest O2, lowest CO2, and lowest ethanol. Shellac and the carnauba microemulsion also altered the volatile profile more than the control and the nanoemulsion did, especially for ‘Unique’ tangors. For ‘Unique’ tangors, the control and nanoemulsion ranked highest for tangerine flavor and had the least off-flavor at the end of storage. Among the coatings tested, the carnauba emulsions demonstrated less water loss, imparted more sustainable gloss, and caused less ethanol production than shellac, with the nanoemulsion exhibiting higher gloss measurements, less modifications of the atmosphere and volatile profile, and, consequently, better flavor compared with the microemulsion.
653 $aAroma volatiles
653 $aMandarin
653 $aTangor
700 1 $aSUN, X.
700 1 $aFERENCE, C.
700 1 $aPLOTTO, A.
700 1 $aBAI, J.
700 1 $aWOOD, D.
700 1 $aASSIS, O. B. G. de
700 1 $aFERREIRA, M. D.
773 $tJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,v. 146$gn. 1, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/01/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/01/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
POSSEBON, B.; SCHEEREN, P. L.; GUARIENTI, E. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
ACADÊMICA UPF; PEDRO LUIZ SCHEEREN, CNPT; ELIANA MARIA GUARIENTI, CNPT. |
|
Título: |
Tolerância à germinação em trigo sob dois métodos de avaliação. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: MOSTRA DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA TRIGO, 8.; MOSTRA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DA EMBRAPA TRIGO, 5., 2013, Passo Fundo. Resumos... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2013. p. 49. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Editores técnicos: Joseani Mesquita Antunes, Ana Lídia Variani Bonato, Márcia Barrocas Moreira Pimentel. |
|
Thesagro: |
Melhoramento; Qualidade; Trigo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/115825/1/2014-mostra-iniciacao-VIII-e-pos-V-2013-p49.pdf
https://www.cnpt.embrapa.br/biblio/av/p_av01.htm
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00725nam a2200169 a 4500
001 2005902
005 2015-01-16
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPOSSEBON, B.
245 $aTolerância à germinação em trigo sob dois métodos de avaliação.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: MOSTRA DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA TRIGO, 8.; MOSTRA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DA EMBRAPA TRIGO, 5., 2013, Passo Fundo. Resumos... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2013. p. 49.$c2013
500 $aEditores técnicos: Joseani Mesquita Antunes, Ana Lídia Variani Bonato, Márcia Barrocas Moreira Pimentel.
650 $aMelhoramento
650 $aQualidade
650 $aTrigo
700 1 $aSCHEEREN, P. L.
700 1 $aGUARIENTI, E. M.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Trigo (CNPT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
