| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/02/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/10/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
GRUTZMACHER, P.; PUGA, A. P.; BIBAR, M. P. S.; COSCIONE, A. R.; PACKER, A. P.; ANDRADE, C. A. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
PRISCILA GRUTZMACHER; ALINE PEREGRINA PUGA, FAPESP; MARIA PAULA SILVEIRA BIBAR, JBS Ambiental; ALINE RENEE COSCIONE, IAC; ANA PAULA CONTADOR PACKER, CNPMA; CRISTIANO ALBERTO DE ANDRADE, CNPMA. |
|
Título: |
Carbon stability and mitigation of fertilizer induced N2O emissions in soil amended with biochar. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Science of The Total Environment, v. 625, p. 1459-1466, 2018. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.196 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Biochar is a promising tool for an efficient and low environmental impact agriculture since can offer both soil carbon (C) sequestration and mitigation of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The extent of biochar C stability after soil amendment and efficiency in reducing N2O emissions from an external nitrogen (N) source were accessed through laboratory incubations. A clay loam soil was amended with chicken manure (CM), sewage sludge (SS), eucalyptus sawdust (ES) and filter cake (FC) feedstocks and corresponding slow-pyrolysis (400 °C) biochars at 5 g C kg? 1 soil in combination with two N fertilizer rates (0 and 140 mg N kg? 1 soil). Carbon dioxide (CO2) and N2O emissions were measured during 60 days. Biochars and feedstocks CO2 emissions were described by an exponential first order kinetics model. For C mineralization an interaction effect was observed for feedstock source and organic amendment. Lower values of mineralizable C was found for biochars than corresponding feedstocks, except for ES. Carbon losses in 60 days of incubation totaled between 0.8 and 9.4% and 2.4 and 32% for biochars and feedstocks, respectively. Regarding to N2O emissions, only CM-biochar impacted emissions with a two-fold increase in non-fertilized soil. When NH4NO3 was co-applied, biochars reduced fertilizer induced N2O emissions, reaching a seven-fold reduction in SS-biochar treatment. The fertilizer emission factor (EF) decreased with biochar amendments as well, varying between 0.01 and 0.08% of the fertilizer N emitted as N2O, which shows the biochar potential to reduce fertilizer induced N2O emissions, with major reduction by SS-biochar mitigating 87% of the soil-fertilizer emissions. Such potential could be explored by designing biochars based on feedstock chemical and structural properties, including a mixed feedstock source biochar that promotes C sequestration and mitigates N2O emissions. MenosBiochar is a promising tool for an efficient and low environmental impact agriculture since can offer both soil carbon (C) sequestration and mitigation of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The extent of biochar C stability after soil amendment and efficiency in reducing N2O emissions from an external nitrogen (N) source were accessed through laboratory incubations. A clay loam soil was amended with chicken manure (CM), sewage sludge (SS), eucalyptus sawdust (ES) and filter cake (FC) feedstocks and corresponding slow-pyrolysis (400 °C) biochars at 5 g C kg? 1 soil in combination with two N fertilizer rates (0 and 140 mg N kg? 1 soil). Carbon dioxide (CO2) and N2O emissions were measured during 60 days. Biochars and feedstocks CO2 emissions were described by an exponential first order kinetics model. For C mineralization an interaction effect was observed for feedstock source and organic amendment. Lower values of mineralizable C was found for biochars than corresponding feedstocks, except for ES. Carbon losses in 60 days of incubation totaled between 0.8 and 9.4% and 2.4 and 32% for biochars and feedstocks, respectively. Regarding to N2O emissions, only CM-biochar impacted emissions with a two-fold increase in non-fertilized soil. When NH4NO3 was co-applied, biochars reduced fertilizer induced N2O emissions, reaching a seven-fold reduction in SS-biochar treatment. The fertilizer emission factor (EF) decreased with biochar amendments as well, varying between 0.01 and 0.08% of the... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Biocarvão; Biomassa pirolisada; Black carbon; Pyrolized biomass. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biomassa; Carbono; Nitrogênio. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biochar; carbon sequestration; Greenhouse gas emissions; nitrogen; Pyrolysis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02891naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2087580
005 2019-10-30
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.196$2DOI
100 1 $aGRUTZMACHER, P.
245 $aCarbon stability and mitigation of fertilizer induced N2O emissions in soil amended with biochar.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aBiochar is a promising tool for an efficient and low environmental impact agriculture since can offer both soil carbon (C) sequestration and mitigation of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The extent of biochar C stability after soil amendment and efficiency in reducing N2O emissions from an external nitrogen (N) source were accessed through laboratory incubations. A clay loam soil was amended with chicken manure (CM), sewage sludge (SS), eucalyptus sawdust (ES) and filter cake (FC) feedstocks and corresponding slow-pyrolysis (400 °C) biochars at 5 g C kg? 1 soil in combination with two N fertilizer rates (0 and 140 mg N kg? 1 soil). Carbon dioxide (CO2) and N2O emissions were measured during 60 days. Biochars and feedstocks CO2 emissions were described by an exponential first order kinetics model. For C mineralization an interaction effect was observed for feedstock source and organic amendment. Lower values of mineralizable C was found for biochars than corresponding feedstocks, except for ES. Carbon losses in 60 days of incubation totaled between 0.8 and 9.4% and 2.4 and 32% for biochars and feedstocks, respectively. Regarding to N2O emissions, only CM-biochar impacted emissions with a two-fold increase in non-fertilized soil. When NH4NO3 was co-applied, biochars reduced fertilizer induced N2O emissions, reaching a seven-fold reduction in SS-biochar treatment. The fertilizer emission factor (EF) decreased with biochar amendments as well, varying between 0.01 and 0.08% of the fertilizer N emitted as N2O, which shows the biochar potential to reduce fertilizer induced N2O emissions, with major reduction by SS-biochar mitigating 87% of the soil-fertilizer emissions. Such potential could be explored by designing biochars based on feedstock chemical and structural properties, including a mixed feedstock source biochar that promotes C sequestration and mitigates N2O emissions.
650 $aBiochar
650 $acarbon sequestration
650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions
650 $anitrogen
650 $aPyrolysis
650 $aBiomassa
650 $aCarbono
650 $aNitrogênio
653 $aBiocarvão
653 $aBiomassa pirolisada
653 $aBlack carbon
653 $aPyrolized biomass
700 1 $aPUGA, A. P.
700 1 $aBIBAR, M. P. S.
700 1 $aCOSCIONE, A. R.
700 1 $aPACKER, A. P.
700 1 $aANDRADE, C. A. de
773 $tScience of The Total Environment$gv. 625, p. 1459-1466, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpao.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/12/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/12/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SORDI, A.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ALBUQUERQUE, M. A.; PIVA, J. T.; ZANATTA, J. A.; TOMAZI, M.; ROSA, C. M. da; MORAES, A. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANDRÉ SORDI, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; Jeferson Dieckow, UFPR; Cimélio Bayer, UFRGS; MÁRCIO AMARAL ALBUQUERQUE, Programa de pós-graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; JONATAS THIAGO PIVA, UFSC; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; MICHELY TOMAZI, CPAO; CARLA MACHADO DA ROSA, UFRGS; Anibal de Moraes, UFPR. |
|
Título: |
Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 94-103, 2014. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.004 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
tCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil. MenostCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or d... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fator de emissão; Óxido nitroso; Volume de urina. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado; Nitrato; Pastagem. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03449naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2003235
005 2014-12-18
008 2014 bl --- 0-- u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.004$2DOI
100 1 $aSORDI, A.
245 $aNitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $atCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil.
650 $aGado
650 $aNitrato
650 $aPastagem
653 $aFator de emissão
653 $aÓxido nitroso
653 $aVolume de urina
700 1 $aDIECKOW, J.
700 1 $aBAYER, C.
700 1 $aALBUQUERQUE, M. A.
700 1 $aPIVA, J. T.
700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A.
700 1 $aTOMAZI, M.
700 1 $aROSA, C. M. da
700 1 $aMORAES, A. de
773 $tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment$gv. 190, p. 94-103, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
|
Nenhum exemplar cadastrado para este documento. |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
