| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/01/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/01/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, G. V.; BUENO, A. de F.; FAVETTI, B. M.; NEVES, P. M. O. J. |
|
Afiliação: |
UNIFIL; ADENEY DE FREITAS BUENO, CNPSO; IAPAR; UEL. |
|
Título: |
Selectivity of chlorantraniliprole and lambda-cyhalothrin to the egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 39, n. 2, p. 549-564, mar./abr. 2018. |
|
DOI: |
10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p549 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Título em português: Seletividade de chlorantraniliprole e lambda-cialotrina ao parasitoide de ovos Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae). |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Controle Integrado; Controle Químico; Parasitologia; Praga; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biological control; Chemical control; Integrated pest management; Parasitoids; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/190159/1/Silva-et-al-2018-Seletividade-a-T-podisi-Semina.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01094naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2103508
005 2019-01-10
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n2p549$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVA, G. V.
245 $aSelectivity of chlorantraniliprole and lambda-cyhalothrin to the egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera$bPlatygastridae).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aTítulo em português: Seletividade de chlorantraniliprole e lambda-cialotrina ao parasitoide de ovos Telenomus podisi (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae).
650 $aBiological control
650 $aChemical control
650 $aIntegrated pest management
650 $aParasitoids
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aControle Integrado
650 $aControle Químico
650 $aParasitologia
650 $aPraga
650 $aSoja
700 1 $aBUENO, A. de F.
700 1 $aFAVETTI, B. M.
700 1 $aNEVES, P. M. O. J.
773 $tSemina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina$gv. 39, n. 2, p. 549-564, mar./abr. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 4 |
|
Autoria: |
METZGER, J. P.; BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C.; FERREIRA, J. N.; FERNANDES, G. W.; LIBRÁN-EMBID, F.; PILLAR, V. D.; PRIST, P. R.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; VIEIRA, I. C. G.; OVERBECK, G. E. |
|
Afiliação: |
JEAN PAUL METZGER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; GERALDO WILSON FERNANDES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS; FELIPE LIBRÁN-EMBID, GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL; PAULA R. PRIST, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; RICARDO RIBEIRO RODRIGUES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; IMA CÉLIA G. VIEIRA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL. |
|
Título: |
Why Brazil needs its Legal Reserves. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, v. 17, n. 3, p. 91-103, July/Sep. 2019. |
|
DOI: |
10.1016/j.pecon.2019.07.002 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Brazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves. MenosBrazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the develop... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bem-estar humano; Capital natural; Serviços de ecossistemas; Sustentabilidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Legislação Florestal; Lei; Vegetação Nativa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Environmental sustainability; Natural capital. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1159149/1/Why-Brazil.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02829naa a2200385 a 4500
001 2159149
005 2023-12-05
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.pecon.2019.07.002$2DOI
100 1 $aMETZGER, J. P.
245 $aWhy Brazil needs its Legal Reserves.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aBrazil's environmental legislation obliges private properties to retain a fixed proportion of their total area with native vegetation, the so-called ?Legal Reserves?. Those areas represent practically one third of the country's native vegetation and are well known for their role in biodiversity protection and in the provisioning of a wide range of ecosystem services for landowners and society. Despite their relevance, this instrument has been criticized by part of the agribusiness sector and its representatives in the Brazilian Congress. The Legal Reserve requirement is said to be too restrictive and to impede the full expansion of agricultural activities, and thus to be detrimental for the development of the country. Here, we critically analyze the arguments employed in the justification of a recently proposed bill that aims to completely extinguish Legal Reserves. We demonstrate that the arguments used are mostly unsupported by data, evidence or theory, besides being based on illogical reasoning. Further, we synthesize the principal benefits of Legal Reserves, including health and economic benefits, and emphasize the importance of these reserves for water, energy, food, and climate securities, in addition to their primary function of assisting in the maintenance of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We also highlight that Legal Reserves are a key-component for effective and less expensive nature-based solutions, and thus should be considered as assets for the development of Brazil rather than liabilities. Based on available sound scientific evidence and agreement on their relevance, we strongly oppose any attempt to extinguish or weaken the maintenance of Brazil's Legal Reserves.
650 $aBiodiversity
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aEnvironmental sustainability
650 $aNatural capital
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aLegislação Florestal
650 $aLei
650 $aVegetação Nativa
653 $aBem-estar humano
653 $aCapital natural
653 $aServiços de ecossistemas
653 $aSustentabilidade
700 1 $aBUSTAMANTE, M. M. C.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, G. W.
700 1 $aLIBRÁN-EMBID, F.
700 1 $aPILLAR, V. D.
700 1 $aPRIST, P. R.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, R. R.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I. C. G.
700 1 $aOVERBECK, G. E.
773 $tPerspectives in Ecology and Conservation$gv. 17, n. 3, p. 91-103, July/Sep. 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
