Data/hora: 21/09/2024 18:26:40

Biblioteca(s): 	Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste.	
Data corrente: 	11/12/2013	
Data da última atualização: 	10/03/2023	
Autoria: 	NASCIMENTO, M.; NASCIMENTO, A. C. C.; CIRILLO, M. A.; FERREIRA, A.; PETERNELLI, L. A.; FERREIRA, R. de P.	
Afiliação: 	MOYSES NASCIMENTO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; ANA CAROLINA CAMPANA NASCIMENTO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MARCELO ANGELO CIRILLO, Universidade Federal de Lavras; ADESIO FERREIRA, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; LUIZ ALEXANDRE PETERNELLI, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; REINALDO DE PAULA FERREIRA, CPPSE.	
Título: 	Association between responses obtained using adaptability and stability methods in alfalfa.	
Ano de publicação: 	2013	
Fonte/Imprenta: 	Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 34, n. 6, p. 2545-2554, nov./dez. 2013.	
DOI: 	10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6p2545	
Idioma: 	Inglês	
Conteúdo: 	This study aimed to evaluate the association between responses obtained using methods of adaptability and stability by using correspondence analysis. The forage yield of 92 genotypes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was investigated. The trial had a randomized block design, with 2 replicates, and the data were used to test the reliability of the different methods. Twenty cuttings were obtained from each genotype between November 2004 and June 2006. Each cutting was grown in a different environment. The estimates of adaptability and stability were obtained using the methods of Eberhart and Russell (1966), Cruz, Torres and Vencovsky (1989), Nascimento et al. (2009b), and Lin and Binns (1988). Following the association analysis, correspondence analysis was conducted for determining association and discriminating the responses obtained using the methods of adaptability and stability. The unfavorable (D) and unpredictable unfavorable (DI) responses obtained using the methods of Lin and Binns (1988) and Eberhart and Russell (1966), respectively, were discrepant in relation to other responses obtained using these methods. The greatest association between responses was confirmed using the methods of Eberhart and Russell (1966) and Cruz, Torres and Vencovsky (1989).	
Palavras-Chave: 	Eberhart and Russell (1966); Genotype × environment interaction; Multiple centroid method.	
Thesaurus Nal: 	correspondence analysis.	
Categoria do assunto: 	F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal	
URL: 	http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/93848/1/PROCI-2013.00191.pdf	
Registro original: 	Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE)	
Exemplares: 	CPPSE - (22234-1) - UPC - AP - DD - PROCI-2013.00191 - NAS - 2013.00191 - DIS