| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/01/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/01/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SOUZA, L. H. C. de; COUTO, E. G.; MATOS, E. da S.; MAGALHÃES, C. A. de S.; SILVEIRA, J. G.; CARVALHO, G. de; BEHLING, M.; SOUZA, A. L. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
LETICIA H. C. DE SOUZA, UFMT; EDUARDO G. COUTO, UFMT; EDUARDO DA SILVA MATOS, SIRE; CIRO AUGUSTO DE SOUZA MAGALHAES, CPAMT; JÚLIA G. SILVEIRA, UFV; GÉSSICA DE CARVALHO, UFV; MAUREL BEHLING, CPAMT; ANDRÉ L. DE SOUZA, UFMT. |
|
Título: |
Dinâmica de palhada em sistemas integrados de produção agropecuária no norte de Mato Grosso. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PLANTIO DIRETO NA PALHA, 16., Sorriso, MT. Sistema de Plantiodireto: entenda os desafios atuais. Prepare-se para o futuro: resumos. Sorriso, MT: FEBRAPDP, 2018. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 39 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Objetivamos quantificar a dinâmica de palhada em diferentes sistemas de produção agrícola sob plantio direto. O experimento está localizado na Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, Sinop/MT. Foram avaliados cinco sistemas produtivos: lavoura; pecuária; lavoura-pecuária; e integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta (ILPF). Amostras de palhada foram coletadas ao longo da safra 2016/2017. A quantidade de palhada aportada por ocasião da dessecação do capim para plantio da soja, nos sistemas lavoura e lavoura-pecuária (?7 Mg ha), foi suficiente para manter o solo coberto ao longo do período avaliado. O sistema pecuária apresentou períodos com quantidade de palhada insuficiente para cobertura do solo, porém, ocorreu pastejo intensivo regulado pela altura do capim a 30 cm, além disso, o aporte de palhada desta área ocorre apenas por morte natural do capim. O sistema ILPF apresentou resultados semelhantes aos sistemas lavoura e lavoura-pecuária, com aporte um pouco menor de palhada após dessecação, em virtude do pastejo animal, durante dois meses, que ocorre anualmente após a colheita do milho. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Serrapilheira; Sustentabilidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cobertura do Solo; Conservação do Solo; Manejo do Solo. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
A Sistemas de Cultivo |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02058naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2104293
005 2019-01-16
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSOUZA, L. H. C. de
245 $aDinâmica de palhada em sistemas integrados de produção agropecuária no norte de Mato Grosso.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
300 $ap. 39
520 $aObjetivamos quantificar a dinâmica de palhada em diferentes sistemas de produção agrícola sob plantio direto. O experimento está localizado na Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, Sinop/MT. Foram avaliados cinco sistemas produtivos: lavoura; pecuária; lavoura-pecuária; e integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta (ILPF). Amostras de palhada foram coletadas ao longo da safra 2016/2017. A quantidade de palhada aportada por ocasião da dessecação do capim para plantio da soja, nos sistemas lavoura e lavoura-pecuária (?7 Mg ha), foi suficiente para manter o solo coberto ao longo do período avaliado. O sistema pecuária apresentou períodos com quantidade de palhada insuficiente para cobertura do solo, porém, ocorreu pastejo intensivo regulado pela altura do capim a 30 cm, além disso, o aporte de palhada desta área ocorre apenas por morte natural do capim. O sistema ILPF apresentou resultados semelhantes aos sistemas lavoura e lavoura-pecuária, com aporte um pouco menor de palhada após dessecação, em virtude do pastejo animal, durante dois meses, que ocorre anualmente após a colheita do milho.
650 $aCobertura do Solo
650 $aConservação do Solo
650 $aManejo do Solo
653 $aSerrapilheira
653 $aSustentabilidade
700 1 $aCOUTO, E. G.
700 1 $aMATOS, E. da S.
700 1 $aMAGALHÃES, C. A. de S.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, J. G.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, G. de
700 1 $aBEHLING, M.
700 1 $aSOUZA, A. L. de
773 $tIn: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PLANTIO DIRETO NA PALHA, 16., Sorriso, MT. Sistema de Plantiodireto: entenda os desafios atuais. Prepare-se para o futuro: resumos. Sorriso, MT: FEBRAPDP, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/11/2013 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/07/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
RIGHI, C. A.; CAMPOE, O. C.; BERNARDES, M. S.; LUNZ, A. M. P.; PIEDADE, S. M. S.; PEREIRA, C. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
Ciro Abbud Righi, ESALQ; Otavio Camargo Campoe, IPEF; Marcos Silveira Bernardes, ESALQ; AURENY MARIA PEREIRA LUNZ, CPAF-AC; Sonia Maria Stefano Piedade, ESALQ; Carlos Rodrigues Pereira, ESALQ. |
|
Título: |
Infuence of rubber trees on leaf-miner damage to coffee plants in an agroforestry system. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agroforestry Systems, Columbia, v. 87, n. 6, p. 1351-1362, Dec. 2013. |
|
ISSN: |
0167-4366 (Print) / 1572-9680 (Online) |
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s10457-013-9642-9 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Published online: 5 October 2013. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The coffee leaf-miner (CLM) (Leucoptera coffeella Guérin-Mèneville; Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), the main pest of coffee plants, occurs widely throughout the Neotropics where it has a significant, negative economic and quantitative impact on coffee production. This study was conducted in a rubber tree/coffee plant interface that was influenced by the trees to a varying degrees depending on the location of the coffee plants, i.e. from beneath the rubber trees, extending through a range of distances from the edge of the tree plantation to end in a coffee monocrop field. The most severe damage inflicted on coffee plants by the CLM (number of mined leaves) from April, which marks the start of the water deficit period, until September 2003 was in the zone close to the rubber trees, whereas the damage inflicted on plants in the monocropped field was comparable to that on coffee plants grown directly beneath the rubber trees, which received about 25-40 % of the available irradiance (Ir-available irradiation at a certain position divided by the irradiation received in full sunlight, i.e. in the monocrop). From May until July damage caused by the CLM nearly doubled in each month. In midwinter (July), the damage decreased perceptibly from the tree edge toward the open field. From September onward, with the rising air temperatures CLM damage in the coffee monocrop started to increase. Based on these results, we conclude that coffee plants grown in the full sun incurred the most damage only at the end of winter, with warming air temperatures. Coffee plants grown in shadier locations (25-40 % Ir) were less damaged by the CLM, although a higher proportion of their leaves were mined. The rubber trees probably acted as a shelter during the cold autumn and winter seasons, leading to greater CLM damage over a distance outside the rubber tree plantation that was about equal to the height of the trees. Future studies should attempt to relate leaf hydric potential to pest attack in field conditions. More rigorous measurements of shade conditions could improve our understanding of the relationship of this factor to CLM attack. MenosThe coffee leaf-miner (CLM) (Leucoptera coffeella Guérin-Mèneville; Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), the main pest of coffee plants, occurs widely throughout the Neotropics where it has a significant, negative economic and quantitative impact on coffee production. This study was conducted in a rubber tree/coffee plant interface that was influenced by the trees to a varying degrees depending on the location of the coffee plants, i.e. from beneath the rubber trees, extending through a range of distances from the edge of the tree plantation to end in a coffee monocrop field. The most severe damage inflicted on coffee plants by the CLM (number of mined leaves) from April, which marks the start of the water deficit period, until September 2003 was in the zone close to the rubber trees, whereas the damage inflicted on plants in the monocropped field was comparable to that on coffee plants grown directly beneath the rubber trees, which received about 25-40 % of the available irradiance (Ir-available irradiation at a certain position divided by the irradiation received in full sunlight, i.e. in the monocrop). From May until July damage caused by the CLM nearly doubled in each month. In midwinter (July), the damage decreased perceptibly from the tree edge toward the open field. From September onward, with the rising air temperatures CLM damage in the coffee monocrop started to increase. Based on these results, we conclude that coffee plants grown in the full sun incurred the most damage on... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroforestería; Coffee; Cultivo mixto; Minador de las hojas; Plagas de plantas; Rubber tree; Sistema Agroflorestal (SAF); Sistemas de sombra. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agrossilvicultura; Bicho mineiro; Cafe; Caucho; Coffea arábica; Consorciação de cultura; Cultivo Continuo; Hevea; Leucoptera coffeella; Monocultura; Performance; Perileucoptera Coffeella; Praga de planta; Seringueira; Sombreamento. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agroforestry; Continuous cropping; Leafminers; Mixed cropping; Plant pests; Shade agroforestry systems. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/93218/1/24770.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03774naa a2200565 a 4500
001 1972252
005 2021-07-06
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0167-4366 (Print) / 1572-9680 (Online)
024 7 $a10.1007/s10457-013-9642-9$2DOI
100 1 $aRIGHI, C. A.
245 $aInfuence of rubber trees on leaf-miner damage to coffee plants in an agroforestry system.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
500 $aPublished online: 5 October 2013.
520 $aThe coffee leaf-miner (CLM) (Leucoptera coffeella Guérin-Mèneville; Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae), the main pest of coffee plants, occurs widely throughout the Neotropics where it has a significant, negative economic and quantitative impact on coffee production. This study was conducted in a rubber tree/coffee plant interface that was influenced by the trees to a varying degrees depending on the location of the coffee plants, i.e. from beneath the rubber trees, extending through a range of distances from the edge of the tree plantation to end in a coffee monocrop field. The most severe damage inflicted on coffee plants by the CLM (number of mined leaves) from April, which marks the start of the water deficit period, until September 2003 was in the zone close to the rubber trees, whereas the damage inflicted on plants in the monocropped field was comparable to that on coffee plants grown directly beneath the rubber trees, which received about 25-40 % of the available irradiance (Ir-available irradiation at a certain position divided by the irradiation received in full sunlight, i.e. in the monocrop). From May until July damage caused by the CLM nearly doubled in each month. In midwinter (July), the damage decreased perceptibly from the tree edge toward the open field. From September onward, with the rising air temperatures CLM damage in the coffee monocrop started to increase. Based on these results, we conclude that coffee plants grown in the full sun incurred the most damage only at the end of winter, with warming air temperatures. Coffee plants grown in shadier locations (25-40 % Ir) were less damaged by the CLM, although a higher proportion of their leaves were mined. The rubber trees probably acted as a shelter during the cold autumn and winter seasons, leading to greater CLM damage over a distance outside the rubber tree plantation that was about equal to the height of the trees. Future studies should attempt to relate leaf hydric potential to pest attack in field conditions. More rigorous measurements of shade conditions could improve our understanding of the relationship of this factor to CLM attack.
650 $aAgroforestry
650 $aContinuous cropping
650 $aLeafminers
650 $aMixed cropping
650 $aPlant pests
650 $aShade agroforestry systems
650 $aAgrossilvicultura
650 $aBicho mineiro
650 $aCafe
650 $aCaucho
650 $aCoffea arábica
650 $aConsorciação de cultura
650 $aCultivo Continuo
650 $aHevea
650 $aLeucoptera coffeella
650 $aMonocultura
650 $aPerformance
650 $aPerileucoptera Coffeella
650 $aPraga de planta
650 $aSeringueira
650 $aSombreamento
653 $aAgroforestería
653 $aCoffee
653 $aCultivo mixto
653 $aMinador de las hojas
653 $aPlagas de plantas
653 $aRubber tree
653 $aSistema Agroflorestal (SAF)
653 $aSistemas de sombra
700 1 $aCAMPOE, O. C.
700 1 $aBERNARDES, M. S.
700 1 $aLUNZ, A. M. P.
700 1 $aPIEDADE, S. M. S.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, C. R.
773 $tAgroforestry Systems, Columbia$gv. 87, n. 6, p. 1351-1362, Dec. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
