| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 31 | |
| 21. |  | PAULA, V. R. de; CARVALHO, A. C. B. de; MATOS, A. N.; MOTTA, I. G. B. da; SILVA, G. H. da; SANTANA, L. A. R.; OTENIO, M. H. Solid waste management performance: a case study in a research institution. Brazilian Journal of Development, v. 8, n. 7, p. 51479-51497, jul. 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|    |
| 22. | | FEIJÓ, T.; DAVID, J. M.; BRAGA, R.; OTENIO, M. H.; PAULA, V. R. de; SANTOS, G. M.; CAMPOS, F.; STROELE, V. @grogest_Ambiental: a web-based decision support system for agribusiness. In: BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIMEDIA AND THE WEB, 27., 2021, Belo Horizonte. Proceedings... New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. WebMedia 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 23. | | NASCIMENTO, A. de M.; MACIEL, A. M.; SILVA, J. B. G.; MENDONÇA, H. V.; PAULA, V. R. de; OTENIO, M. H. Biofertilizer application on corn (Zea mays) increases the productivity and quality of the crop without causing environmental damage. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, v. 231, n. 8, article 414, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|  |
| 25. | | BARROS, M. V.; SALVADOR, R.; MACIEL, A. M.; FERREIRA, M. B.; PAULA, V. R. de; FRANCISCO, A. C. de; ROCHA, C. H. B.; PIEKARSKI, C. M. An analysis of Brazilian raw cow milk production systems and environmental product declarations of whole milk. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 367, 133067, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 26. | | MACIEL, A. M.; OTENIO, M. H.; PAULA, V. R. de; BENHAMI, V. M. L.; PIEKARSKI, C. M.; ROCHA, C. M. da; BARROS, N. O. Life cycle assessment of milk production system in Brazil: environmental impact reduction linked with anaerobic treatment of dairy manure. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, v. 54, 102883, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 27. | | MOTTA, I. G. B. da; SANTANA, L. A. R.; PEREIRA, H. P.; PAULA, V. R. de; MARTINS, M. F.; CARNEIRO, J. da C.; OTENIO, M. H. Population dynamics of methanogenic archea in co-digestion systems operating different industrial residues for biogas production. Sustainability, v. 14, 11536, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 28. | | BARUSELLI, P. S.; ABREU, L. A. de; PAULA, V. R. de; CARVALHO, B. C. de; GRICIO, E. A.; MORI, F. K.; REBEIS, L. M.; ALBERTINI, S.; SOUZA, A. H. de; D'OCCHIO. Applying assisted reproductive technology and reproductive management to reduce CO2-equivalent emission in dairy and beef cattle: a review. Animal Reproduction, v. 20, n. 2, e20230060, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 29. | | PAULA, V. R. de; MAIA, J. de M. R.; OTENIO, M. H.; OLIVEIRA, C. S.; BRIGHENTI, A. M.; PINTO, A. C. T.; CARVALHO, A. da C.; COSTA, F. J. N. Manual de boas práticas de segurança no GERECAMP. Juiz de Fora: Embrapa Gado de Leite, 2016. 24 p. (Embrapa Gado de Leite. Documentos, 195).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 30. | | RIBEIRO, P. E. de A.; SILVA, M. S. L. da; COELHO, E. F.; BARROS, L. C. de; SIMOES, W. L.; MARMO, C. R.; GUILHERME, L. C.; CORREA, R. de O.; OTENIO, M. H.; TAVARES-DIAS, M.; PAULA, V. R. de; BERNARDES FILHO, R. Gestão da água e saneamento em comunidades rurais. In: SILVA, M. S. L. da; MATTHIENSEN, A.; BRITO, L. T. de L.; LIMA, J. E. F. W.; CARVALHO, C. J. R. de (Ed.). Água e saneamento: contribuições da Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. cap. 8, p. 125-147. (Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 6).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Gado de Leite; Embrapa Instrumentação; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 31. | | RIBEIRO, P. E. de A.; SILVA, M. S. L. da; COELHO, E. F.; BARROS, L. C. de; SIMOES, W. L.; MARMO, C. R.; GUILHERME, L. C.; CORREA, R. de O.; OTENIO, M. H.; TAVARES-DIAS, M.; PAULA, V. R. de; BERNARDES FILHO, R. Water management and sanitation in rural communities. In: SILVA, M. S. L. da; MATTHIENSEN, A.; BRITO, L. T. de L.; LIMA, J. E. F. W.; CARVALHO, C. J. R. de (ed.). Clean water and sanitation: contributions of Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2020. p. 81-94. (Sustainable Development Goal, 6).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 31 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/09/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
BARUSELLI, P. S.; ABREU, L. A. de; PAULA, V. R. de; CARVALHO, B. C. de; GRICIO, E. A.; MORI, F. K.; REBEIS, L. M.; ALBERTINI, S.; SOUZA, A. H. de; D'OCCHIO. |
|
Afiliação: |
PIETRO SAMPAIO BARUSELLI, NIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; LAÍS ÂNGELO DE ABREU, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; VANESSA ROMARIO DE PAULA, CNPGL; BRUNO CAMPOS DE CARVALHO, CNPGL; EMANUELLE ALMEIDA GRICIO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; FERNANDO KENJI MORI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; LÍGIA MATTOS REBEIS, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; SOFÍA ALBERTINI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; ALEXANDRE HENRILY DE SOUZA, CARGILL NUTRIÇÃO ANIMAL; MICHAEL D'OCCHIO, UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY. |
|
Título: |
Applying assisted reproductive technology and reproductive management to reduce CO2-equivalent emission in dairy and beef cattle: a review. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Reproduction, v. 20, n. 2, e20230060, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0060 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Methane emission from beef and dairy cattle combined contributes around 4.5-5.0% of total anthropogenic global methane. In addition to enteric methane (CH4) produced by the rumen, cattle production also contributes carbon dioxide (CO2) (feed), nitrous oxide (N2O) (feed production, manure) and other CH4 (manure) to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of beef and dairy production systems. The relative contribution in standard dairy systems is typically enteric CH4 58%, feed 29% and manure 10%. Herds with low production efficiency can have an enteric CH4 contribution up to 90%. Digestibility of feed can impact CH4 emission intensity. Low fertility herds also have a greater enteric CH4 contribution. Animals with good feed conversion efficiency have a lower emission intensity of CH4/kg of meat or milk. Feed efficient heifers tend to be lean and have delayed puberty. Fertility is a major driver of profit in both beef and dairy cattle, and it is highly important to apply multi-trait selection when shifting herds towards improved efficiency and reduced CH4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified for feed efficiency in cattle and are used in genomic selection. SNPs can be utilized in artificial insemination and embryo transfer to increase the proportion of cattle that have the attributes of efficiency, fertility and reduced enteric CH4. Prepubertal heifers genomically selected for favourable traits can have oocytes recovered to produce IVF embryos. Reproductive technology is predicted to be increasingly adopted to reduce generation interval and accelerate the rate of genetic gain for efficiency, fertility and low CH4 in cattle. The relatively high contribution of cattle to anthropogenic global methane has focussed attention on strategies to reduce enteric CH4 without compromising efficiency and fertility. Assisted reproductive technology has an important role in achieving the goal of multiplying and distributing cattle that have good efficiency, fertility and low CH4. MenosMethane emission from beef and dairy cattle combined contributes around 4.5-5.0% of total anthropogenic global methane. In addition to enteric methane (CH4) produced by the rumen, cattle production also contributes carbon dioxide (CO2) (feed), nitrous oxide (N2O) (feed production, manure) and other CH4 (manure) to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of beef and dairy production systems. The relative contribution in standard dairy systems is typically enteric CH4 58%, feed 29% and manure 10%. Herds with low production efficiency can have an enteric CH4 contribution up to 90%. Digestibility of feed can impact CH4 emission intensity. Low fertility herds also have a greater enteric CH4 contribution. Animals with good feed conversion efficiency have a lower emission intensity of CH4/kg of meat or milk. Feed efficient heifers tend to be lean and have delayed puberty. Fertility is a major driver of profit in both beef and dairy cattle, and it is highly important to apply multi-trait selection when shifting herds towards improved efficiency and reduced CH4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified for feed efficiency in cattle and are used in genomic selection. SNPs can be utilized in artificial insemination and embryo transfer to increase the proportion of cattle that have the attributes of efficiency, fertility and reduced enteric CH4. Prepubertal heifers genomically selected for favourable traits can have oocytes recovered to produce IVF embryos. Reproductive... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Metano entérico; Reprodução assistida. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Eficiência Reprodutiva; Fertilidade Animal; Reprodução Animal. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1156935/1/Applying-assisted-reproductive-technology-and-reproductive-management.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03002naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2156935
005 2023-09-27
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0060$2DOI
100 1 $aBARUSELLI, P. S.
245 $aApplying assisted reproductive technology and reproductive management to reduce CO2-equivalent emission in dairy and beef cattle$ba review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aMethane emission from beef and dairy cattle combined contributes around 4.5-5.0% of total anthropogenic global methane. In addition to enteric methane (CH4) produced by the rumen, cattle production also contributes carbon dioxide (CO2) (feed), nitrous oxide (N2O) (feed production, manure) and other CH4 (manure) to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of beef and dairy production systems. The relative contribution in standard dairy systems is typically enteric CH4 58%, feed 29% and manure 10%. Herds with low production efficiency can have an enteric CH4 contribution up to 90%. Digestibility of feed can impact CH4 emission intensity. Low fertility herds also have a greater enteric CH4 contribution. Animals with good feed conversion efficiency have a lower emission intensity of CH4/kg of meat or milk. Feed efficient heifers tend to be lean and have delayed puberty. Fertility is a major driver of profit in both beef and dairy cattle, and it is highly important to apply multi-trait selection when shifting herds towards improved efficiency and reduced CH4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified for feed efficiency in cattle and are used in genomic selection. SNPs can be utilized in artificial insemination and embryo transfer to increase the proportion of cattle that have the attributes of efficiency, fertility and reduced enteric CH4. Prepubertal heifers genomically selected for favourable traits can have oocytes recovered to produce IVF embryos. Reproductive technology is predicted to be increasingly adopted to reduce generation interval and accelerate the rate of genetic gain for efficiency, fertility and low CH4 in cattle. The relatively high contribution of cattle to anthropogenic global methane has focussed attention on strategies to reduce enteric CH4 without compromising efficiency and fertility. Assisted reproductive technology has an important role in achieving the goal of multiplying and distributing cattle that have good efficiency, fertility and low CH4.
650 $aBovino
650 $aEficiência Reprodutiva
650 $aFertilidade Animal
650 $aReprodução Animal
653 $aMetano entérico
653 $aReprodução assistida
700 1 $aABREU, L. A. de
700 1 $aPAULA, V. R. de
700 1 $aCARVALHO, B. C. de
700 1 $aGRICIO, E. A.
700 1 $aMORI, F. K.
700 1 $aREBEIS, L. M.
700 1 $aALBERTINI, S.
700 1 $aSOUZA, A. H. de
700 1 $aD'OCCHIO
773 $tAnimal Reproduction$gv. 20, n. 2, e20230060, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
